pandaknows
Justice for Jennifer
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2019
- Messages
- 212
- Reaction score
- 2,433
Sisolak debuted the changes during a press conference in Carson City, where he said he planned to adopt a more granular approach to containing the virus — starting with next week’s rollout of a new “long-term mitigation strategy” that will examine ZIP code-level data on COVID-19 cases.
So cordoning off areas by ZIP Code - kind of like the Warsaw Ghetto? What could possibly go wrong with that plan?
Just my opinion (since about the beginning) but the only way we get back to normal is through some kind of mechanism that decouples lifestyle from a burden on health care. Health insurance plans penalize smokers and employer-subsidized plans all seem to include "wellness" provisions. Auto insurers penalize or deny coverage to drunk drivers. Insurers need Covid Plans. Full coverage for a large premium, discounts for people who can prove that they don't leave home, but ultimately a system that moves the risk to the individual. Eventually it would get like any other type of specialized care where every city would contain a branch of Covid Treatment Center's of America.
My wife heard that schools are opening for in-person learning on August 17, because enough parents made a stink. Combine that with loss of $600/wk checks and I think we going to see a pivot away from wall-to-wall coverage of the rarest and most extreme cases, and back the original boilerplate that the virus causes few, if any, symptoms in most people. There should perhaps be more emphasis and study put into the actual number of cases: Reported coronavirus cases vastly underestimate the true number of infections, U.S. government data published Tuesday suggest, echoing results from a smaller study last month. I understand that it's difficult, if not impossible, for public officials to talk about deaths in any manner that sounds clinical or disrespectful, but it's probably important that people understand the true risks.
The ABC news link in the middle of your post was interesting to me, specifically:
"The study likely detected infections in people who may have had no symptoms or only mild illness, and who never got coronavirus tests. Infection rates were from six times higher than reported cases in Connecticut to 24 times higher in Missouri."
Antibody tests show coronavirus rates 10x higher, CDC study finds
I believe there is an observable link between location and behavior, whether by individual choice or factors outside of an individual's control (i.e. Poverty, community guidelines). See Connecticut vs Missouri. Behaviors can be observed and the result quantified in terms of infection rates. MOO.