Their emphasis does seem to be towards risks during pregnancy. This is what I found about vaccines in general:It's a good thing that you are here with us and see that those concerns could be baseless?
I too don't know how to react to folks who don't want to discuss and challenge others respectfully as we do here. e.g. the vaccines specifically state not for pregnant women, so where do folks say "they plan on giving this to pregnant women". There was a small number who got pregnant with the studies... but where are you seeing such exclamation.
Yes, even Fauci said best to work around vaccine and getting infected as he doesn't want it thrown back. But with an mRNA.. as the first two are... it never gets inside the DNA of the mother as some that are upcoming are.
As to loss of limbs with babies, are they talking about the 1950's drug?
Pregnant women have been given vaccines for decades, she says, with few issues. "We don't generally give live viral vaccines in pregnancy because there's theoretical risk that the live virus could be passed and it infects the fetus," Jamieson says. "But with the exception of smallpox vaccines, there really have been very few problems with vaccines."
edited to add link: Pregnant People Haven't Been Part Of Vaccine Trials. Should They Get The Vaccine?
Last edited: