Shaymus at The Rock
Inactive
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 3,746
- Reaction score
- 0
easily make that legal argument. At the time RC failed to return the children to their mother his paternity had not been established and thus he had NO legal right to those children. CS gave him permission to take the children for a set period of time. He had kept them for three months by the time the hearing occurred. If she had any clue she should have gone to court when he failed to return them.
He did not go to court just seeking custody as there would have been no basis to do so as paternity had not been established. This was the motion he brought "PETITION TO DETERMINE PATERNITY AND RELATED RELIEF". Until paternity was established the mother is the only legal parent of the minor children and the only person who has legal custody.
Of course, IMO the whole "trip" was just a setup concocted by RC & TN to set a pretty stage for custody. Let CS think you're away, move in with Mommy, get a job, and run to court. Not rocket science but good system manipulation.
So you think there was no trip to Texas for a job, boytwnmom ? I wondered what possible reason an employer would send Ron there, an infant and toddler in tow.
And, the magistrate did not follow up on the alleged trip to Texas just as he did not follow up on the daycare issue. Sad.