CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #62

[sleuth66]

PG is doing a great job of staying on task and resisting JS’s attempts to lure him into a trap. Way to go PG. Indeed he has nothing to hide and he is a great foil for MT and her shady actions.
I hope they will show interview #3 next so we can see the contrast between upstanding PG (albeit confused at the time- he couldn’t believe his boss would kill his wife, but OMG what was going on with the seats and the scripts and the car wash?) and sleazy slimy conspiring MT (who in contrast feigned confusion and overshared and blatantly lied).

MOO.

 

[Megnut]

State has to correct JS. Two visits to PG's home. Jeep taken the second trip.

Now about showing LE the powering trail.

PG had only been there twice, nothing tuned with FD.

JS is in the reeds with big gravel and steep trails.

JS asks if LE preferred him to take the truck, not his wife's sedan because of terrain. PG does not recall terrain as the reason.

 

[Love Never Fails]

Why is JS going into the bike ride so much? What’s the point?

 

[Alkali13]

Hey guys, did you hear that this hill was steep?

 

[Megnut]

MOO

JS appears to be trying purposefully to trip the witness up on irrelevant details so he can claim perjury. This is egregious.

MOO

 

[Alkali13]

Reservoir 6 is where the JFD memorial people set up at the entrance is.

 

[sleuth66]

Hey guys, did you hear that this hill was steep?

And there’s some gravel….

 

[Megnut]

JS has spent 5 minutes asking PG about where he parked relative to various parking areas.

Establishes this is where he was issued the SW for the truck.

 

[nodamselindistress]

Hey guys, did you hear that this hill was steep?

IKR? Was waiting on him to start in on the geological make up of what formed the danged hill.

 

[Megnut]

JS is asking which days he interviewed with police, how many times.

State interrupts. He's confused about which interview JS is talking about.

[We're all confused.]

 

[waldojabba]

Yes, but it also appeared to be a swing and a miss, perhaps IMO? If not ridden on the street, it would not need to be registered IMO? And without a title can be a real treat in some locales to try and get a bike (dirt or street) registered or titled without a title. (So as I write this, maybe the held title was another means of control?)
And as you say, did not reflect well on MT or JS, (or even FD). IMO
What I got from it was MT wanted the bike back. Not clear whether a proposed purchase/sale ever had commenced. And from testimony yesterday from PG, I think he rode it once between FD residences/work, as it seemed he had trouble trying to get FD to return the Toyota to him. MOO

Definite swing and huge strike out. Imo

 

[shotgun09]

IKR? Was waiting on him to start in on the geological make up of what formed the danged hill.

I actually was waiting for the never-ending drone video footage......zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

[Alkali13]

MOO

JS appears to be trying purposefully to trip the witness up on irrelevant details so he can claim perjury. This is egregious.

MOO

Right??? I'm thinking the same thing, it's disgusting!

 

[Alkali13]

I actually was waiting for the never-ending drone video footage......zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Genuinely surprised he didn't use that here, lol

 

[Alkali13]

Why is JS going into the bike ride so much? What’s the point?

I wonder if he is going to try to insinuate that it's really hard to ride a bike uphill and much easier to use a dirt bike? Not to belabor the point, but it is a legit steep hill, haha

 

[Alkali13]

Reservoir 6 is where the JFD memorial people set up at the entrance is.

It's even on street view from 2022. I kept meaning to go take a photo for you guys, but here!

 

[afitzy]

IKR? Was waiting on him to start in on the geological make up of what formed the danged hill.

Send up the drone!


MOO

 

[Megnut]

JS is referring to an early interview where he described FD as a fine builder, nice guy, etc.

Another interview, you knew they were divorcing and had been for a long time...

JS asking about moving things for JFd without telling FD

JS asks about PG telling LE that FD was upset the divorce was taking so long. PG doesn't recall.

JS reads a statement about PG saying FD complained about how long it was taking

In the last months, isn't it true --

The FD was happy
That FD said he had a favorable report --

PG says FD said he had a good chance of getting full custody of the children.

JS starts reading entire statement.

Objection, hearsay

Judge says this is impeachment. And this isn't according to the code.

State adjusts his objection, to improper impeachment.

Judge says it has to be done per code.

Witness has not seen the transcript.

JS marks it for ID to give to the witness.

 

[I am not Sherlock H.]

Judge right on point here. Evidentiary; witness not shown statement. Just like earlier when JS wanted to get more from cross on whether PG had wanted to hand over his phone without a warrant. (And it was also apparent defense had not entered law enforcement video of the interaction with PG into evidence when that was pressed.) MOO

 

[Megnut]

PG is reviewing the transcript of his interview/s with police.