CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #63

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #161
I think JS just said they shouldn't get the AT&T records since his client made no calls related to this case. Alrighty then. Guess we can all go home.

Why not admit the phone and cloud data if she has nothing to hide?
Moo
 
  • #162
L&C chat is on fire during this discussion:

"Horn sounds like a drunk argument at a wedding party"

MOO
 
  • #163
Judge says he rules on endured before him, not on previous rulings. JS goes right back to the prior ruling.
 
  • #164
How is the Judge's heart?

JS seems to be filibustering to stall a ruling on suppression.... until after this Judge passes.
 
  • #165
Yep JS, you are arguing at nauseum!
 
  • #166
Defence Counsel has now so confused himself that he is unable to speak.

Random citing of cases going back to the times of the floods....

Painful to listen to this word salad from Defence.

MOO
 
  • #167
JS representing that the State coukd keep getting new warrants and he'd be forced to argue ad nauseum.
 
  • #168
ATT holds records for 5 years (vs the 7 years in the exhibit I posted last night from the FBI)

This is good news for most of the MT data existing at the time of the second search warrant by State.

MOO
 
  • #169
Sounds to me like McGuinnes is schooling the courtroom rn.
 
  • #170
The interpreter !!!!!!!!!
 
  • #171
State representing that AT&T hold records for five years....

Reasons to deny:

1. Untimely manner of filing. State had provided discovery to the Defense months before Jan 2.

2. Defendant has no standing for expection of privacy. The current warrant has cause.
 
  • #172
Looks like they perhaps got the info of Mama Troconis from the tower dump!

Interesting......very interesting.....

Wonder if she had a role in all this beyond what we might have originally contemplated here....

Curious.

MOO
 
  • #173
  • #174
McGuiness is listing the supporting points for the PC warrant.

Bloody assault, defendant accompanied FD, disposal of bloody evidence, defendant had her phone. All reasons toward PC.
 
  • #175
If defendant is apparently on the text / cell phone / lap top during hearings, evidence, proceedings as there are reports of that….. then why is there an interpreter (with a strong, loud voice IMO) giving her in ear live renderings of testimony?
It is as though there are two hearings occurring. :(
Wish I was on that jury….. and I am not in CT. MOO
 
  • #176
Love the word used by McGuiness when referring to Defence Counsel - a bit too kind imo as Defence simply isn't making factually based statements:

Conflates.....

 
  • #177
L&C:
"Jury is going right from breakfast to lunch"
MOO
 
  • #178
Looked up CSLI

Cell Phone Location Tracking
 
  • #179
McGuiness is explaining The Box. State articulates that it was a completely different warrant.

I think he's arguing that there's no spoilt fruits here.

Law of the Case doctrine, unfounded.

Previous judge ruled on DNA, says Defense is blurring DNA and cellphone data.
 
  • #180
Schoehorn should have included his cites in his motion instead of just springing them on the court.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
65
Guests online
3,453
Total visitors
3,518

Forum statistics

Threads
632,659
Messages
18,629,774
Members
243,237
Latest member
riley.hartzenberg
Back
Top