CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #63

[Misy]

Absolutely agree. I thought we would see more bombshells.

I think p did a great job laying out all of the proof that Jennifer was murdered by Fotis but I honestly think that p has to do a better job of explaining MT’s involvement, CLEARLY!

Meaning they have shown the evidence but I’d like to see a step-by-step layman’s guide if you will showing every piece of evidence as shared beautifully in court by the exhibits/testimonies but not tied together like it should be to prove each and every charge against MT with the vivid examples as it’s been much too choppy and hard-to-follow.

For example, put up her written in perfect English alibi script on a giant screen in big bold font and with a lighted pointer go line-by-line, starting with highlighting her perfectly written English, then with the evidence to prove each line and lie with evidence to prove it with photos, quotes, testimony, phone data etc. moving down the paper, line by line showing her video clips saying she answered Andreas’s call and what that means, saying it clearly means that she stayed at 4jc and went up to his office and answered a pre-planned call from Fotis’s friend Andreas from Greece to form an alibi for Fotis and state clearly that this shows that MT conspired and explain what that means! Show the phone records of her going up the stairs….

Show a video clip of her saying what Fotis was wearing that morning and then a clip of him riding a bike wearing a hoodie during that time etc.! So what I am saying is show that she lied with the proof….

Show charts and clips of her going to and from 80 ms and 4jc multiple times with the phone data and surveillance clips. Show the clip of what Pg said and Lauren. Explain the coffee spill as she explained the bloody seats of the Tacoma and how she said it didn’t smell like coffee and say it seems like she should know what coffee smells like as she loves Starbucks and show that clip!!!!

Show close-ups of her body language from arrest to court appearances to interviews and in Starbucks and how body language matters citing other cases…

On the big screen show the mop pic and bloodied paper towel bits and green and yellow sponge that they found in the trash and roll the tape of her saying she brought these items to
80 ms to clean. Show her in the car coffee her phone records of her in the car etc…..state clearly that she accompanied Fotis dumping the garbage and show the photos of what they collected and state that tbis was clearly tampering with evidence.

Then show receipts of their cleaning lady from years of cleaning to explain how MT never typically cleans (show the clip of her saying just that) so why that day?!!!

Show clips of all the descriptive English words and phrases she used in all of the interviews. You cannot watch all of these videos in full and claim she doesn’t understand English. Get people to testify how she understands just fine as js is going to say she doesn’t.


Show her phone data and pics of her car driving to the car wash and explain that they took the red Tacoma that Fotis used in the murder to the car wash and they had a plan for her to follow him there to get a full detail and that proves Michelle is tampering with evidence. She followed him and emphasize how that was planned. She knew by this time re Jennifer but didn’t find this concerning? Explain why to anyone this would be gravely concerning. They never washed PH’s car before after using it many times and play that clip from pg.

I could go on and on as I am frustrated that it’s all there but not presented clearly, in my opinion.

It looks like all FD which I know they have to prove the murder but the evidence is there against MT but in my opinion they have not clearly shown the jury how she was involved in everything and in lockstep with him from the beginning to end.

Perhaps they plan on doing that in closing but it best be tight as it’s all there but must be better conveyed as I’ve seen in other trials.

Moo

Totally 100% agree. The prosecution is laying out facts with sometimes little background and/or context to tie things together. Has anyone ever read a book, loved it, then was disappointed in the movie they made from the book? I often think, if I only saw this movie without reading the book first, would I really get the story? Many of us have read this book, following this case since the day JF was reported missing and we’ve known the evidence that was being collected during the investigation, all of the evidence, for all of the co conspirators. Now that we’re “seeing the movie” I’m afraid the jury is not being presented with a clear map of how all of this evidence (phone data, videos, prior statements, all of it) CLEARLY shows that MT helped, had knowledge, lied lied lied, and is guilty. I hope the state ties a beautiful bow around ALL the evidence with a beautiful clear picture of what was done, and by whom. Moo

 

[Eli9]

JS establishes that the ATM machine has push button prompts.

 

[Megnut]

JS asks about touch screens....

JS asks if they searched for the account holder.

No, we were given a date and time.

End of cross

 

[afitzy]

Good to see MT clearly sitting in the vehicle at the ATM with FD.

L&C on point with asking, "Did FD use JF ATM card to take more of her cash?"


MOO

 

[sleuth66]

The nanny is my guess. Or maybe he was so delusional that he thought the school would call him but I doubt that JFd had that sort of emergency plan in place.

Remember, he knew the kids had an orthodontist appt in NY.
As Meehan testified, JFD had informed him on May 13 in the OFW app and offered to front the money for it.

 

[Megnut]

State goes on the record, asking for a much earlier hypothetical presented to Madel be stricken. Misspoke.

 

[Megnut]

Detective Kimball, back on the stand.

 

[Megnut]

Third interview August 13, 2019
Two detectives
MT
Atty Bowman

 

[BUF]

Does JS know anything but a “hearsay” objection?

I’m hoping that Det Kimball will be able to tie some of this together

 

[afitzy]

L&C: "Duct tape Horn"....

Objections from Defence and JUDGE is FINALLY stopping the Defence TESTIMONY OBJECTION MOVE!

AMEN and BLESS YOU JUDGE R.

MOO

 

[Megnut]

LE had learned:

Video of the Tacoma coming and going from NC

Objection, hearsay. Judge allows as course of investigation

New objection, relevancy. Judge says the State can present their case as they please.

Witness learned that MT's DNA was on a garbage bag.

Objection, overruled.

Bloodlike stains on the fabric swatch, consistent with JFd

Objection, overruled

FD and MT had gone to the car wash and left the Tacoma there to be detailed.

PG indicated that on the day of Jennifer's MURDER....

Objection. Wants stricken.

Not relevant. Immaterial.

Judge overrules.

Indicated that he saw his keys, they were missing and the MT brought them back.

 

[Diddian]

Testimony regarding MT playing game of hide-and-seek with Pavel Gumienny's Toyota keys.

 

[Megnut]

State asks about restraining order.

JS asks for and gets a sidebar.

 

[Gardenista]

I have a feeling Gloria Farber won't treat the situation as cavalierly as the judge treated it. I see a civil lawsuit in MT's future.

 

[Megnut]

Close up of MT. Nothing to play with but a pen.

 

[afitzy]

MT was playing the HIDING THE PG Key game as was long suspected!

AMEN
MOO

 

[Pitsleuth]

When/where was the atm footage? sorry I missed that part

 

[afitzy]

Ah, the MT "restraining order" written by KM enters the case I think.

Sidebar.
MOO

 

[afitzy]

When/where was the atm footage? sorry I missed that part

FD and MT took out cash and then Peoples Bank to pay for detailing PG car. Took place in Farmington.
MOO

 

[Megnut]

When/where was the atm footage? sorry I missed that part

Morning of 5/29, en route to the car wash. With cash.