CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #64

[Megnut]

JS says that they dispute that MT lied. Misremembered, was coerced....

That she lied, he disputes that that shows consciousness of guilt.

 

[lucegirl]

I’m waiting for the Judge to reiterate that the issue is D’s credibility regarding her actions that day

 

[Megnut]

MOO

Did JS get his case law from the law books in the photo at JS? Or from the bottom shelf, from within the package of Depends?

 

[pseudo_hum]

Why did esteemed defendant need to lie in each of her police interviews?

 

[Megnut]

State: defense seems to say we have a different interpretation of the evidence so acquit.

 

[BUF]

When you lie in investigation(s) it is absolutely a consciousness of guilt

 

[afitzy]

I’m waiting for the Judge to reiterate that the issue is D’s credibility regarding her actions that day

@lucegirl, were you surprised to see Judge R not inclined to do the Motion to Quash the testimony of Atty Rose? He seemed to go the same route as he did with Atty Meehan testimony but sadly we saw how that played out.

Is this just an issue of providing 'rope' to Defence and allowing them to put on their case?

 

[lucegirl]

State: defense seems to say we have a different interpretation of the evidence so acquit.

The jury interprets the evidence. Sit down!

 

[afitzy]

MT is texting now

 

[Megnut]

State

We have shown

FD murdered JFd.

FD had motive.

FD drove to NC in an employee's vehicle.

Killed her with at least two blows.

State shoots down Moody. Presumptive tests were further tested, positive for a match to JFd.

FD left with her body, disposed of her clothing.

No body doesn't mean jury can't find for homicidal violence.

 

[afitzy]

State vs Moody - State claims Defence is misstating

 

[lucegirl]

@lucegirl, were you surprised to see Judge R not inclined to do the Motion to Quash the testimony of Atty Rose? He seemed to go the same route as he did with Atty Meehan testimony but sadly we saw how that played out.

Is this just an issue of providing 'rope' to Defence and allowing them to put on their case?

I didn’t or haven’t watched yet. Did I read correctly the testimony would just be a written stipulation or the stipulation will be the ground rules for the testimony - regarding atty client privilege and the double yellow line for the report? I’ll have to go back and listen.

Will be fun to see how the State does a cross of a witness like a big girl or boy!

 

[Megnut]

No requirement to present a witness who says we had an agreement.

Circumstantial:

Affair

Custody arrangement where she has to leave the home for visitation. Two years of torture.

MT had not moved to CT "for this".

Threatening to leave FD.

Extremely upset and willing to harm her "bury that b*tch"

Self serving statenent to cover up her part in crime -- "if she shows up..."

Foreknowledge in answering the pre-arranged call

Actively lied about his whereabouts, even after being told FD killed MT

MT was home alone manipulated the phone while FD was in NC.

Consciousness of guilt. Protecting FD.

 

[Megnut]

State doesn't need to show she conspired with others. Conspired with FD. Satisfies the charge.

 

[Megnut]

MT agreed to assisted with...

Was present (shortly after) at 80 MS when the Tacoma arrived.

Pause for interpreter-- technical issue

 

[afitzy]

I didn’t or haven’t watched yet. Did I read correctly the testimony would just be a written stipulation or the stipulation will be the ground rules for the testimony - regarding atty client privilege and the double yellow line for the report? I’ll have to go back and listen.

Will be fun to see how the State does a cross of a witness like a big girl or boy!

@lucegirl, The way I understood it was Atty Rose atty would draft a stipulation to be submitted today by business close, Judge would review submitted stipulation and approve/deny/modify but I'm not an atty.

 

[afitzy]

Placeholder for late joiners:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

16:57 for beginning of State response for motion for acquittal
Excellent summary of State case imo - good warm up closing too imo

 

[Megnut]

Assisted

Several trips back and forth

Brought cleaning supplies

Blocked the view so FD could hide the license plates

Lied about her actions. When she was driving, assisting, lighting fires

Assisted with cleaning

Her DNA on the opening of a bag containing blood and clothing linked to JFd.

Tacoma was used in the commission of the crime.

MT was aware and assisted.

Took the keys. In an effort to keep the truck to continue concealing evidence.

Car wash, same

So clean there was no DNA.

Car wash destroyed DNA evidence.

MT concealed knowledge of Tacoma in first two interviews. Car wash too. Consciousness of guilt.

 

[Eli9]

I LOVE how the State keeps pointing out the many LIES by MT

 

[Megnut]

State.... a reasonable can find....

Steady refrain.