CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #64

[Megnut]

State asks Judge if has any questions.

Judge asks....

Of Count 5

May 29th... MT believing an investigation.... altered, destroyed, concealed, removed....

State: the car wash itself.

State attached her as an accessory -- she aided FD in tampering with evidence. The Tacoma.

 

[Megnut]

JS calls out Prosecutorial Misconduct

Also says they haven't proven FD was in NC.

 

[BUF]

Now JS is citing prosecutorial misconduct??

 

[Megnut]

JS: completely made up.

 

[carolmaria]

The jury interprets the evidence. Sit down!

Glad to remove this, as it’s hearsay On another board, a live trial observer opined that the members of the jury appeared focused, observant (reading the room), and competent; that s/he would feel confident that they’d weigh evidence carefully and come to a reasonable verdict. MOO Hope so.

 

[Megnut]

He says the fire is pure speculation. She said she did it!

PG didn't identify his truck at Waveny! (He didn't not!)

 

[afitzy]

Schoenhorn now claiming no evidence of FD in New Canaan for the murder?

I'm confused.

 

[Eli9]

JS: completely made up.

+ zero evidence, and completely speculative

 

[Megnut]

JS says there's no evidence JFd's vehicle was parked at Waveny all day.

JFd's phone paired in the afternoon...

 

[Megnut]

JS: no evidence MT knew what FD did

 

[Megnut]

JS: MT did not provide transportation to FD to the car wash. She was going to meet with her attorney and picked up FD on the way.

 

[Megnut]

JS: PG knew that FD wanted to clean the Tacoma. MT did not know or see FD cleaning the Tacoma. Only handled a paper towel.

 

[BUF]

These next few days are going to be a trip…a bad one!

 

[afitzy]

Horn Blaming PG yet again

MT did not ask for or receive immunity - REALLY?????????????????????????????????????????????????? I saw interviews 3 times where LE wanted to work something out

We have now landed on Mars.....

MOO

 

[Megnut]

JS: we don't even know what time she picked him up (at the car wash)

JS angered by the State saying MT allowed her phone number be used.... was wrong. False.

Says FD used her phone/number because he didn't have his phone.

Assumption upon assumption. Speculation upon speculation.

MT has no knowledge of what happened to JF. No knowledge of what FD did.

 

[Aquarian]

A little worried about count 5?

 

[Megnut]

Court begins...

What Court has to find for judgment of acquittal.
Court does not have to prove BARD on each count.
Only that there's enough evidence for a jury to determine....
Court cannot determine credibility of any one witness
This is no way of marshaling of evidence
Jury can consider MT's statement -- JFd should be buried with the dog.


Jury can reasonably conclude that MT said she didn't know where he was that mooring but later said he wasn't there -- indication she knew and was covering for FD.
Jury can conclude there was an agreement for MT to pick FD.

Court doesn't have to determine the weight of evidence, just whether there's enough evidence to go to the jury.

 

[BadRx]

YES!! Denied

 

[Megnut]

Court discussing conspiracy. Finds enough evidence on Counts 1 through 6 to go to jury.

Motion for acquittal DENIED

 

[pseudo_hum]

So in other words, JS, MT is spaced out.