I agree with you that he thinks he will be cleared and I think his history with the family and civil courts have allowed him too much leniency which has built up his confidence that he can beat any charge. I am just an ordinary person looking over all the great detailed info provided by the much more knowledgeable than me people about the motions he had filed, all the no shows, refusal to provide evidence etc and what punishment did he get? I have been trying to decide if he had some sort of privilege with some higher up in the system that allowed him to be treated like a spoiled child and thus get more out of control . To an outsider it looks like certain people are looking out for each other at the expense of innocent victims. Or is this just the way the legal system is everywhere? (I am not saying this about LE because from what I have read they are searching everywhere under awful conditions etc and seem to be doing all they can) . I am putting my hope in the state attorney
It's more common with people with money to drag these things out. Because other people can't afford to do as much aggressive litigation.
It is not true at all, however, that he wasn't punished by the system. I keep seeing this statement that he was somehow getting away with something. But I think sometimes people's personal experiences and dissatisfaction with the system has colored how they view this case.
Because despite all his riches, custody was basically taken from him and he was reduced to what was basically almost the most restrictive custody and visitation plan available. First all contact with his kids was suspended and then it was super limited and monitored by a therapist. There were additional serious conditions imposed.
I have explained over and over that this is very rare and very punitive. This is reserved for the worst parents OR the ones with the most serious issues like drug issues or mental health breaks.
What we have to understand is that for Jennifer, custody of her kids likely was he issue that had the highest priority in her divorce. The court would treat it the same way. So discovery battles (about disclosing evidence upon demand) would take longer while the parties focused on child custody.
Finally, as I have explained several times, the court system doesn't have as much money as it needs to run super smoothly. So the court calendars are typically super impacted. That creates delays. And an aggressive litigator with enough money can take advantage of that.
These points are why FD had not had to face the music when it came to disclosing his financial information, sooner. But he was at that point when it was coming to a head and that's when Jennifer disappeared. Conveniently.
Corruption and pay offs did not occur here. Not close. It does frustrate me that the family law court system continually gets blamed on Jennifer's threads. I can attest, as a family law attorney, that there is zero basis for it.
If there was corruption his kids never would have been taken from him. Clearly he considers them his property and I believe he killed Jennifer in large part because he was not going to allow the court or his wife tell him when he could be with his kids. I think he feels that's his right. That they are his and he is the only one who should be able to dictate who they see and when.