afitzy
Former Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2019
- Messages
- 11,285
- Reaction score
- 126,557
Oh my!Lawyer for Fotis Dulos says prosecutors are ‘desperate’ to link his client to Jennifer Dulos’ disappearance and are ignoring other possible leads
Pattis’ motion seeking an emergency order to compel prosecutors to turn over evidence said investigators interviewed colleagues of Dulos at his luxury home building business, The Fore Group, Monday evening in an effort “to implicate Mr. Dulos in the disappearance of his wife, even asking the employee to speculate on where Ms. Dulos’ body might be, an invitation the witness refused. The state seems desperate to develop an accomplice in the case, rather than refocusing its effort on trying to build a case based on available evidence.”
_________________________________________________________
My question - I wonder what "Monday evening" this took place? Could it be just recently??
ETA: And it mentions accomplice? Maybe FD is going to say MT did it and MT is going to say FD did it, or maybe the State thinks there is a 3rd person involved and that's what "accomplice" Norm is talking about? Thoughts?
Looks like things are getting a bit tense and they are in a total panic in Pattisville based on the HC article posted above!
Cannot wait to read the entire five page motion tomorrow!
The HC article posted above did have the following nugget of pure Pattis gold which put me on the edge of my seat waiting for what other nuggets are in the rest of the document!
“The defendant should not be compelled to fiddle in the bright light of public scorn while the state wastes time and resources in the futile effort to place him at the scene of a crime he didn’t commit,” Pattis wrote. [BBM]
Pattis IMO must have been pounding tequila shots with FO at the marble island counter at 4Jx IMO when he wrote the above as it is over the top dramatic. I was going to search for the movie that line came from (convinced I've heard it before) but its simply not worth the effort IMO.
Pattis IMO now risks being seen as hysterical toddler having a temper tantrum in the supermarket as he is screaming to anyone that will listen that he DEMANDS the MT testimony transcript along with whatever other half baked items on his list he believes he is entitled to based strictly on his schedule.
Entitled to me is such a key word in this case as IMO we have an overly entitled client FO and his counsel that is simply beyond overly entitled. Shoutout to No Case Norm, sorry but you will simply have to wait and sadly your client will have to endure the 'bright lights' shining for the justice process to work. If you and your client are feeling overly anxious then by all means pop a xanax and chill! Public Service Notice: But please don't mix the xanax and the tequila as we look forward to your dramatic court appearances!
So Pattis is angry that FO is 'compelled to fiddle in the bright light of public scorn'? Guess so. But it seems like that is par for the course when you are accused of a very serious crime such as tampering/hindering that could most likely be tied to a murder. If you are uncomfortable with 'bright lights', IMO the best way to avoid them is to not commit multiple crimes and be seen on one of the best CCTV city setups in the US dumping evidence with your accomplice MT. Is Pattis saying that the public should feel sorry for the 'bright lights' shining on the bald head and beady eyes of FO? Guess so. By the time he was asking for public sympathy in his motion, Pattis and FO must have had 4 shots because honestly who would expect sympathy for anyone that has been accused of these crimes? Based on all that is now out and public about FO, IMO he was being generous in describing himself as a 'monster'!
Again, no words from Pattisville for missing mother JD. Again, no words from Pattisville about the 5 children without a mother who are no doubt either back in school or heading back to school soon. Nope. The Pattis legal team so far has demonstrated the emotional intelligence of a stone IMO.
Pattis wants the public to be concerned that a light is shining on his client FO. All I can say to this is THANK GOD that the light is on and shining brightly on both Pattis AND his client.
I seriously question the basic intelligence behind Pattis chastising the State for spending money on the investiation and prosecution or make claims about the State wasting time and resources in the investigation of a missing mother of 5 young children. The public is vested in seeking justice in this case so to try to drum up opposition to the cost involved is ludacris IMO. The people of CT have been conditioned to seeing vast waste in Hartford for years so $1 million or so for the JD investigation is a drop in the bucket IMO! The Pattis feeble attempts to bait the State and Atty Bowman are frankly getting old and boring, really old and really boring....
MOO MOO MOO
Last edited: