Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #29

[Alathea]

If MT wanted to leave a “Positive record” for her daughter, she never would have shacked up with a married man to begin with .

Her unethical demise started then ..

It makes me wonder what the daughter saw and heard, though she's too young to be questioned, of course.

 

[kimch33kim]

Have we heard about or seen any videos of KM or MT that day? I believe MT was spotted shopping and of course the Odyssey of Idiocy but any other videos?
Seems to me other cameras would have picked up these two as well as FD. LE tight lipped about any other players. I wonder if KM has a criminal lawyer for his potential involvement with JD disappearance. Unless I missed it, KM just fell off the face of the earth. I guess he has plenty of his own troubles both with and without FD. I wonder if FD has been introduced to Mr. Gas Can Crowbar? Could he be the missing link? LE probably has viewed those videos a thousand times, trying to identify “familiar” faces.

MT spotted shopping in Farmington was something posted in the HC by NP so I would take that with a grain of salt TBH.

 

[Alathea]

KM is the silent part of the puzzle.

• It's been reported that KM had FD contact the wife in KM's divorce if she would like to kiss and make up at FD's (for privacy of course).
• KM's wife reports that he also has a serious issue with alcohol.
• KM's wife also reports that KM may have sent crowbar, gas can man to "look at her garage" and perhaps other things.
• NP said that as well as MT, KM would remember under oath where he was on the morning of May 24th. (That's really a non-confirmation, eh?)
• KM's wife reported that he sexually assaulted her. (All the comments about KM divorce are in the divorce documents and media about the FD contact...See below)

I think KM is still on the court documents as the court didn't act on his motion to withdraw his appearance (I saw 2 motions requesting to be allowed to withdraw). At least I couldn't find an acceptance of the request.
Former Fotis Dulos attorney accused of spousal rape, wanting his wife ‘dead’
No restraining order against lawyer: Mawhinney is said to have used Dulos in attempt to contact his own estranged wife
ALL MOO

The articles in her quote above are really worth RE-reading (though we've all read them before). Also worth re-reading, though I can't find it now, are the comments made by the ever-slimy attorney now representing FD - his comments denying Mawhinney's wife's claims about having been raped, being in fear for her life, etc. He slams her as if she made it all up. He should have been muzzled in that case, too, like the rabid dog he is.

Former Fotis Dulos attorney accused of spousal rape, wanting his wife ‘dead’
An attorney who represented Fotis Dulos up until a few weeks ago in his mother-in-law’s civil lawsuit has been accused of spousal rape and charged with violating a protective order involving his estranged wife who believes he “wanted her dead,” police said.

Kent Douglas Mawhinney, 53, a South Windsor attorney, was charged last month with violating the terms of the protective order by using Fotis Dulos to contact his estranged wife in an attempt to arrange a meeting with her, according to an arrest warrant.

Mawhinney’s wife told police she believed Fotis Dulos was working with her estranged husband “to get rid of her,” according to the arrest warrant. Fotis Dulos briefly met with the woman in West Hartford on May 19, according to the warrant, and then contacted her on May 20 and May 21 — three days before his own wife vanished. ...

 

[Alathea]

bbm

This was one of the funnier stories about MT IMO. It was baffling why she delayed so long before filing the paternity suit?

Kate Middleton was punished by the UK press and called 'Waity Katie' for following her guy around for 10+ years.

MT did the same with GB, she hung on and clung on and really was a bit like poison ivy or a bad rash until she finally relocated to Miami.

MOO

The timing of her filing the paternity suit was VERY interesting. IIRC, she did it just before marrying the guy in FL! That was another short relationship; <modsnip: individual is not sleuthable>

 

[Alathea]

Why is Kent Mawhinney cc’d on all legal papers filed by Weinstein? In what capacity is he representing FD these days?

Regarding Mawhinney being copied on motions:

It would seem he cannot be copied after Halloween, as he's going to turn into a pumpkin - that is, he will be dissolving his practice.

https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/local/article/Former-Fotis-Dulos-attorney-accused-of-spousal-14272055.php
In the motion, David Markowitz and Mawhinney stated their practice will be dissolved on Oct. 31. They also cited Markowitz’s age of 71 and Mawhinney’s interest to pursue immigration law as reasons for their withdrawal from the case.

 

[BellaVita]

I believe there are sociopaths in every culture. There is nothing "normal" about FD's personality and behavior in any civilized culture!

Of course there are sociopaths in every culture. Culture can exacerbate what is already apparent. IME. IMO.

 

[Outforjustice]

According to the attorney for Gloria Farber, the mother of missing New Canaan woman Jennifer Dulos, Michelle Troconis, the girlfriend of Jennifer's estranged husband Fotis Dulos, 'abused' her Fifth Amendment rights.
Attorney Richard Weinstein, representing Gloria Farber, wants Troconis to provide information about Fotis Dulos’ business dealings. Weinstein contends Fotis Dulos was shuffling money from his high-end real estate development company, Fore Group, to his personal accounts, including travel and meals involving Troconis, according to court papers filed Thursday.
A judge overruled a request from Troconis’ attorney, Andrew Bowman, to quash a subpoena requiring his client to be deposed in the lawsuit. But when Troconis arrived last month for the deposition, she invoked her Fifth Amendment rights for every question, according to court papers filed by Weinstein.
Bowman has filed a new motion, opposing Weinstein’s request for a judge to compel Troconis to provide information about Fotis Dulos’ business. Weinstein responded on Thursday, requesting the judge to toss Bowman’s motion because the court papers were not sent to him personally.

Weinstein pointed out in the court filing that Troconis has spoken with state police several times, admitting she did not see Fotis Dulos the morning his estranged wife disappeared, according to arrest warrants. Weinstein also said Troconis and Fotis Dulos created "alibi" notes that were false and that she participated in other instances construed by police as attempts to cover up her boyfriend's role in the disappearance, according to the warrants.
Attorney for Jennifer Dulos’ mother: Troconis ‘abused’ her Fifth Amendment rights

FD claims money from HF was a “gift” since there was no Promissory Note .

If HF wanted to “gift” money he would have written a check out to his daughter..NOT to Fore Group .

The NERVE of this guy .

 

[Tink56]

You mean to suggest that FD is going to be bunking with Mama A?

Maybe she will take him on as a 'protege' and together they can run weekend seminars to show others how to manipulate the legal system to their advantage!

I might just buy a ticket to that show!

Mama A and Fotis seem to be a match made in scamster heaven!

PS. Still am worried about potential marital privilege coming into play if JD is declared deceased and the 2 'turtledoves' file a motion with the court to have a 'hall pass' to tie the knot over the weekend. Cannot even imagine the legal issues associated with such a situation. My guess is that Mama A is all over this issue and has her team of 'Miami legal mavens' working 24/7 to figure it all out so that 'true love' and the 'ultimate coverup' may prevail.

MOO and Yuck

In regards to your P.S.....This is a real concern....

• If JF is declared deceased and FD is arrested certainly a marriage could be arranged.
• It could be revealed that FD and MT held a church ceremony in Greece, but didn't take care of the "legal" civil ceremony yet.
• If JF remains missing the above two can't come into play.
• If JF is declared dead the trust issues and, perhaps, life insurance could come into play.

And, a few other considerations relative to a final answer of JF's disappearance:

• If FD is arrested for murder prior to conclusion of the civil matters...I think those would remain in limbo for a very, very long time. This would include the eviction, the loan issues with GF, the child custody, etc.
• In the case of a murder arrest, FD would continue to be the owner and controlling interest in all real estate properties. In fact, he could continue to control these while in prison.
• FD's parental rights could not be terminated easily, even if he were convicted of murder. It would be time consuming and very painful for the kiddos and the rest of JF's family and friends.

Hope I'm wrong about some of these. Welcome folks to correct me.....it suddenly seems very daunting....an arrest or take care of the civil stuff first? Double UGH!

Seems to me that LE could pick and choose the motive for FD to disappear his legal spouse. This is a real headache....IMO, all MOO only!

 

[Southernsnooper]

I MISS @afitzy!!!!!!

Me too!!!

 

[Morgan10028]

Regarding Mawhinney being copied on motions:

It would seem he cannot be copied after Halloween, as he's going to turn into a pumpkin - that is, he will be dissolving his practice.

https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/local/article/Former-Fotis-Dulos-attorney-accused-of-spousal-14272055.php
In the motion, David Markowitz and Mawhinney stated their practice will be dissolved on Oct. 31. They also cited Markowitz’s age of 71 and Mawhinney’s interest to pursue immigration law as reasons for their withdrawal from the case.

If I'm not mistaken, they dissolved early. Markowitz used the dissolution papers to try to get out of his depo with Weinstein. MOO

 

[Tink56]

Me too!!!

Me, three....I feel her presence, however.

Energy forward...spread a little justice for the Jennifer and the rest of the Farbers!

 

[Jmoose]

FD claims money from HF was a “gift” since there was no Promissory Note .

If HF wanted to “gift” money he would have written a check out to his daughter..NOT to Fore Group .

The NERVE of this guy .

He’s got a lot of brass, alright

 

[Morgan10028]

FD can file a Foreclosure Mediation Petition for Reinclusion
https://www.jud.ct.gov/webforms/forms/CV136.pdf

Are you sure about that? When I saw the order, I went to the site to see what FD's options were to untangle himself yet again, and though I saw the petition for reinclusion, I understood that to be an option IF he had already been in the mediation program prior, which the records do not show he was (then again, maybe it's just how the question was proposed?). Plus, a judge would have to grant it. This doesn't seem like an easy one for FD to play by his own rules this time.

(text copied and pasted from link at bottom)
11. My client participated in mediation previously, but mediation was terminated. Can I request mediation again?
Yes. You may file a Foreclosure Mediation Petition for Reinclusion (JD-CV-136) for this purpose. If a judge grants the petition, the case will be referred to the Foreclosure Mediation Program.
Foreclosure FAQs for Attorneys - CT Judicial Branch

 

[NDreu]

In regards to your P.S.....This is a real concern....

• If JF is declared deceased and FD is arrested certainly a marriage could be arranged.
• It could be revealed that FD and MT held a church ceremony in Greece, but didn't take care of the "legal" civil ceremony yet.
• If JF remains missing the above two can't come into play.
• If JF is declared dead the trust issues and, perhaps, life insurance could come into play.

And, a few other considerations relative to a final answer of JF's disappearance:

• If FD is arrested for murder prior to conclusion of the civil matters...I think those would remain in limbo for a very, very long time. This would include the eviction, the loan issues with GF, the child custody, etc.
• In the case of a murder arrest, FD would continue to be the owner and controlling interest in all real estate properties. In fact, he could continue to control these while in prison.
• FD's parental rights could not be terminated easily, even if he were convicted of murder. It would be time consuming and very painful for the kiddos and the rest of JF's family and friends.

Hope I'm wrong about some of these. Welcome folks to correct me.....it suddenly seems very daunting....an arrest or take care of the civil stuff first? Double UGH!

Seems to me that LE could pick and choose the motive for FD to disappear his legal spouse. This is a real headache....IMO, all MOO only!

Truly the legal issues associated with the overall JF situation are daunting. Given the circumstances though I hope that the State is working with GF representatives to manage the situation as the issues involved can have long term consequences and most clearly impact the children, who are the primary concern IMO.

Its been puzzling to see MT legal maneuvers play out (or not) in civil court and criminal court. We have zero indication that she is 'playing ball' with the State and there is also no indication that any kind of 'cooperating agreement is in place' which may or may not be a concern. I also wonder if Atty. Norman Pattis is directing the MT defense as well as its likely he and his tactics might have more in common with MT and Mama A vs Atty Bowman. In the Bareth case it seemed like the cooperation agreement process moved relatively quickly but we aren't seeing that in the Dulos case. I continue to wonder why MT seems to maintaining silence and its baffling why more charges weren't added to the existing charges for her lying to LE for over 2 months. My guess is that Mama A. is in charge of the process of 'saving' MT and not Atty Bowman and I do wonder if Mama A believes that a possible 'marriage' to FD might solve her daughters legal issues? I'm not so sure, but Mama A is a manipulator of the system and almost convicted felon herself and operates on a whole different level so at this point I guess we have to wait and see what scam/plan she devises to 'save' MT.

As we have seen, legal matters move in slow mo in CT Courts, so I'm not certain that termination of parental right won't hit the radar as an issue later rather than sooner. GF is in her 80s and believed to be in good health, but my guess is that she would want this issue resolved in short order. Clearly other issues have to be resolved before this happens, but the risk of FD accessing the children in person or any of their assets has to a primary consideration for the next legal moves by the GF Family Court legal team IMO. The Family Court records show the profound adverse impact that FD has had on his children and the potential psychological damage associated with his involvement with the children at any level could be devastating. We have heard zero about any 'appeal' by FD and Atty. R to the custody award to GF so either it wasn't filed or we haven't heard about it.

MOO

 

[NDreu]

MT spotted shopping in Farmington was something posted in the HC by NP so I would take that with a grain of salt TBH.

Agree. This narrative was all part of the 'alibi scripts' which Atty. Norman Pattis repeated verbatim for months and which was reposted endlessly by DA and HC as well. We have NO timeline for MT on the 24th other than what has been reported in AWs, which clearly includes her presence on Albany Avenue for the 'trash bin odessey of stupidity' and the personalized driving and cleaning services detailed in AW2 regarding the car wash and 80MS and EE red truck. Atty Weinstein brought up MT picking her daughter up from school but this statement hasn't been confirmed yet by LE. MOO

 

[Jmoose]

In regards to your P.S.....This is a real concern....

• If JF is declared deceased and FD is arrested certainly a marriage could be arranged.
• It could be revealed that FD and MT held a church ceremony in Greece, but didn't take care of the "legal" civil ceremony yet.
• If JF remains missing the above two can't come into play.
• If JF is declared dead the trust issues and, perhaps, life insurance could come into play.

And, a few other considerations relative to a final answer of JF's disappearance:

• If FD is arrested for murder prior to conclusion of the civil matters...I think those would remain in limbo for a very, very long time. This would include the eviction, the loan issues with GF, the child custody, etc.
• In the case of a murder arrest, FD would continue to be the owner and controlling interest in all real estate properties. In fact, he could continue to control these while in prison.
• FD's parental rights could not be terminated easily, even if he were convicted of murder. It would be time consuming and very painful for the kiddos and the rest of JF's family and friends.

Hope I'm wrong about some of these. Welcome folks to correct me.....it suddenly seems very daunting....an arrest or take care of the civil stuff first? Double UGH!

Seems to me that LE could pick and choose the motive for FD to disappear his legal spouse. This is a real headache....IMO, all MOO only!

My insurance sources claim that life insurance, in the unlikely chance that FD could possibly be anyone’s beneficiary, would be held up until it was obvious he would never be charged in her death, or until he was tried and acquitted. The very minute the insurer gets even a hint of a dispute, much less a murder of the person upon whom the policy is held, and the suspect is the beneficiary, they stop writing the check. But I doubt he is a beneficiary of such a policy, and maybe GF and her legal team have the trust structured in such a way that FD can’t touch it. I do think timing here is crucial, and likely why he hasn’t been charged yet with murder. They do need MT’s cooperation, which up until now hasn’t been forthcoming. They need her to violate her bail conditions so they can lock her up again and make her squeal. As for marriage...I do believe these two are holding out for a marriage clause to keep MT from being compelled to testify against him.

 

[NDreu]

What I am curious about though as at what point might FD and Atty Norman Pattis turn their legal wrath against MT?

Atty. Norman Pattis at this point is literally nowhere in terms of alibi for his client and the emergence of the 'alibi scripts' in AW2 showed that FD was lying to his legal team just as MT was lying to her legal team IMO. The Chaz/AJ shows indicated that Atty. Norman Pattis started his private investigation immediately upon taking on the case and given how vocal he has been you might think that he would share some of the deets with the public. But, this hasn't happened. Could it be that there is no alibi and one will never be forthcoming? IMO this seems likely.

FD has clearly said he knows what he did do and what he didn't do. What if what he didn't do was come up with the idea of doing away with JD? What if this plan was the brainchild of MT or even Mama A?

If the FD PI cannot come up with another party to blame (seems likely they will drag EE or try to) then who else is left other than MT? I actually think this development could be stunning to watch play out as the 2 co-defendants would turn against each other in a vicious battle. What is curious about this is that both are avowed liars (FD in Family Court and MT in AW2), completely unlikeable, not credible witnesses, amoral and not believable IMO. But what happens if the 2 main players turn on each other? Who would a jury believe?

It would be quite easy for FD to put forward a story of how everything that happened was absolutely planned and directed by MT who was sick, tired and enraged about waiting for the divorce to be done with as all she wanted was to be married and have another child. This scenario would be quite easy for a jury to digest, given the MT work and personal life choices history.

Timing is everything and I wonder if murder or manslaugher/kidnapping charges drop then is that too late for MT to get any type of 'cooperation agreement'? Would/Could MT still qualify for a 'cooperation agreement' if FD and Atty. Norman Pattis put forward an argument that the instigator behind the disappearance/murder of JF was in fact MT? IDK. Curious questions though I think!

MOO

 

[Morgan10028]

Agree. This narrative was all part of the 'alibi scripts' which Atty. Norman Pattis repeated verbatim for months and which was reposted endlessly by DA and HC as well. We have NO timeline for MT on the 24th other than what has been reported in AWs, which clearly includes her presence on Albany Avenue for the 'trash bin odessey of stupidity' and the personalized driving and cleaning services detailed in AW2 regarding the car wash and 80MS and EE red truck. Atty Weinstein brought up MT picking her daughter up from school but this statement hasn't been confirmed yet by LE. MOO

Ok, now I'm SO confused...re "Atty Weinstein brought up MT picking her daughter up from school but this statement hasn't been confirmed yet by LE." Weinstein stated in this motion that this information was on page 34 of the 2nd AW. Wouldn't that be confirmation from LE?

 

[Outforjustice]

If I'm not mistaken, they dissolved early. Markowitz used the dissolution papers to try to get out of his depo with Weinstein. MOO

Of course he did .
Scammer #1 passed on his scammer knowledge to Scammer #2 for some
dough re me .

Moo

 

[NDreu]

Ok, now I'm SO confused...re "Atty Weinstein brought up MT picking her daughter up from school but this statement hasn't been confirmed yet by LE." Weinstein stated in this motion that this information was on page 34 of the 2nd AW. Wouldn't that be confirmation from LE?

I had thought that Atty Weinstein made his statement perhaps based on the work of his PI staff who no doubt have better/more complete info on the MT timeline than we have at this point.

Here is the section from AW2 where MT talks about Nicole--she says she went home OR went to go pick up Nicole-WHICH WAS IT? WHO KNOWS????. From the language in the AW it isn't 100% clear to me that that MT picked up Nicole that day. IDK what to think but it doesn't sound like a definitive answer, but then few things in the AW seemed definitive as MT sounded petulant and vague at best and LE had to use directed questioning to get her to confirm anything so far as I can tell.
MOO