Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #32

[afitzy]

And the pick up at JFK is probably to avoid CT media. There shouldn't be any special priveledgrs for this. The Farber family and Jennifer's children don't get to spend the rest of their Thanksgivings, holidays, and birthdays with their mother, daughter, sister, and friend. Why should the state of CT make it easy on MT. Maybe just maybe....charges will be pressed soon!!?!?

Haha! If this is the case then the joke is on them as both the New York Post and Daily News and CBS/NBC NY could very well be at the airports covering the holiday traveling season. Perhaps MT is looking to get some coverage by the paparazzi and perhaps we will be treated to pictures of MT and Mama A in matching 'ugly Christmas sweaters' for their trip to JFK! Wouldn't that be a picture for the press! MOO

 

[afitzy]

Maybe MT will hide the foot bracelet from her daughter and doesn't want her to know she is being monitored...restricted from out of state. ..hence why she wants to pick her up to act normal as she has ALWAYS (more than likely)picked her up and doesn't want her daughter questioning why she wouldn't be there. I wouldn't want to put a motion through alerting others of arrival of daughter in the court system. WTH was Bowman thinking and advising?

Sadly MT daughter was in CT in June to see her mother arrested the first time and fitted with the ankle bracelet so she knows that her Mom has been accused of a series of very serious crimes by the State of CT. Those pictures of MT daughter at 4Jx were sad to see IMO and so told me with even greater precision, the care and consideration that MT gave to her daughter during the course of her 'relationship' with FD - not much IMO. I do very much wonder how much the bio dad knows about the MT legal situation and why any parent that had options would want their child subjected to the overall situation?

Children of suspects are unwilling victims in the situation but what I have found so hard to process is not protecting your child by getting them out of the area and protecting them from the Press and people that could hurt them with commentary etc. It seems that MT is doing precisely the opposite and is in fact having her daughter return to CT. Simply no words for any of this....

 

[sds71]

A Superior Court judge has ruled Michelle Troconis must answer 18 questions in a deposition in a civil lawsuit involving her ex-boyfriend Fotis Dulos, who along with Troconis has been charged in connection with the May disappearance of Dulos’ estranged wife Jennifer Farber Dulos.

Tronconis was deposed by attorney Richard Weinstein in September and pleaded the Fifth Amendment to all but two questions — her name and where she was living at the time. Her lawyer, Andrew Bowman, ordered Troconis to assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination because of the “continuing investigation” into Farber Dulos’ disappearance "which may or may not result in a homicide charge or in a conspiracy charge.”
“Ms. Troconis is in the very difficult position of not only being charged with certain serious crimes but also runs a risk that she could be charged with additional crimes as a result of law enforcement’s continuing investigation,” Bowman wrote. “Even acknowledging knowing Fotis Dulos is incriminating.”
Many of them are mundane such as whether or not she has a U.S. passport or is a citizen of Argentina. But some relate to whether she observed Dulos doing business in several locales. The judge has compelled her to answer questions about who Dulos may have met with when he visited her in Miami Beach, Florida or in Vail, Colorado.

Noble is allowing Troconis to assert the Fifth Amendment to any questions about her relationship with Dulos, any knowledge she may have of The Fore Group’s finances and whether she has any information on how Dulos is paying for the litany of attorneys representing him in criminal, civil, family and probate court. Noble also said she doesn’t have to answer questions about her time living on Jefferson Court in Farmington with Dulos.
Troconis is not on Weinstein’s witness list for the civil trial that begins Tuesday and is expected to last two or three days. She could still be called as a rebuttal witness if, as expected, Dulos takes the stand and testifies on his own behalf.
After she invoked Fifth Amendment, judge orders Michelle Troconis to answer 18 questions in civil lawsuit involving Fotis Dulos

 

[kimch33kim]

A Superior Court judge has ruled Michelle Troconis must answer 18 questions in a deposition in a civil lawsuit involving her ex-boyfriend Fotis Dulos, who along with Troconis has been charged in connection with the May disappearance of Dulos’ estranged wife Jennifer Farber Dulos.

Tronconis was deposed by attorney Richard Weinstein in September and pleaded the Fifth Amendment to all but two questions — her name and where she was living at the time. Her lawyer, Andrew Bowman, ordered Troconis to assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination because of the “continuing investigation” into Farber Dulos’ disappearance "which may or may not result in a homicide charge or in a conspiracy charge.”
“Ms. Troconis is in the very difficult position of not only being charged with certain serious crimes but also runs a risk that she could be charged with additional crimes as a result of law enforcement’s continuing investigation,” Bowman wrote. “Even acknowledging knowing Fotis Dulos is incriminating.”
Many of them are mundane such as whether or not she has a U.S. passport or is a citizen of Argentina. But some relate to whether she observed Dulos doing business in several locales. The judge has compelled her to answer questions about who Dulos may have met with when he visited her in Miami Beach, Florida or in Vail, Colorado.

Noble is allowing Troconis to assert the Fifth Amendment to any questions about her relationship with Dulos, any knowledge she may have of The Fore Group’s finances and whether she has any information on how Dulos is paying for the litany of attorneys representing him in criminal, civil, family and probate court. Noble also said she doesn’t have to answer questions about her time living on Jefferson Court in Farmington with Dulos.
Troconis is not on Weinstein’s witness list for the civil trial that begins Tuesday and is expected to last two or three days. She could still be called as a rebuttal witness if, as expected, Dulos takes the stand and testifies on his own behalf.
After she invoked Fifth Amendment, judge orders Michelle Troconis to answer 18 questions in civil lawsuit involving Fotis Dulos

Thank you for sharing! Horrible reporting skills on behalf of DA IMO

Does he not proofread or what? I mean the typo is not that bad but getting the color of the car she was last seen in incorrectly is like WT[REDACTED]
Maybe too excited for turkey MOO

 

[MDATCA]

FD crooked CPA is KM former paralegal's ex husband. Just sayin'!!!!

I am sure the "bad boys" network have someone shady in every profession. We are just barely scraping the surface of how deep the corruption goes.

 

[Alathea]

Sadly MT daughter was in CT in June to see her mother arrested the first time and fitted with the ankle bracelet so she knows that her Mom has been accused of a series of very serious crimes by the State of CT. Those pictures of MT daughter at 4Jx were sad to see IMO and so told me with even greater precision, the care and consideration that MT gave to her daughter during the course of her 'relationship' with FD - not much IMO. I do very much wonder how much the bio dad knows about the MT legal situation and why any parent that had options would want their child subjected to the overall situation?

Children of suspects are unwilling victims in the situation but what I have found so hard to process is not protecting your child by getting them out of the area and protecting them from the Press and people that could hurt them with commentary etc. It seems that MT is doing precisely the opposite and is in fact having her daughter return to CT. Simply no words for any of this....

BBM Agree. MT has never shown common sense in parenting when it comes to her daughter. The fact that she got into a relationship with a married man with 5 children - who was still living with (and dependent upon) his wife - showed little regard for her daughter's emotional well-being. Whatever MT does is for herself, and for financial gain without the investment of actual work.

She showed complete lack of regard for her daughter when she knowingly participated in the murder of Jennifer - whether in planning, completing, cleaning up, covering up, or all of those.

Now, she's simply visibly throwing her daughter in to the middle of it.

Meanwhile, CT taxpayers are probably paying for her defense...

 

[Alathea]

Thank you for sharing! Horrible reporting skills on behalf of DA IMO

View attachment 217944View attachment 217945
Does he not proofread or what? I mean the typo is not that bad but getting the color of the car she was last seen in incorrectly is like WT[REDACTED]
Maybe too excited for turkey MOO

Or NP wrote it for him. (We KNOW NP doesn't proofread anything he writes. )

 

[kimch33kim]

Or NP wrote it for him. We KNOW NP doesn't proofread anything he writes.

Good idea NP or the infamous NP intern. Must be them. Lol MOO

 

[sds71]

Farber v. Fore group
No 118.00 11/27/2019 D REQUEST TO AMEND AND AMENDMENT

Defendants' Request for Leave to File Amended Answer (adding 2 Count Counterclaim)

 

[kimch33kim]

Farber v. Fore group
No 118.00 11/27/2019 D REQUEST TO AMEND AND AMENDMENT

Defendants' Request for Leave to File Amended Answer (adding 2 Count Counterclaim)

Wooo FD asking for monetary damage. No surprises here.

 

[SkylarSid]

Atty Colangelo supposedly didn't object to the 'trip' to JFK so it looks to be a 'done deal'.

I have to admit to joining the group here that thinks this trip is suspicious and makes no sense given the many available options. Assuming Atty Bowman fee for motion and filing fees was $1,000+ and car service was $250/$300 to Avon then it really makes it an easy choice to make except if MT daughter is en route to another location and MT only way to see her would be to visit her at the airport.

Whatever the situation I hope that Atty Colangelo has tasked the monitoring company to make sure that MT makes zero stops along the way and does what she says she is going to do at the airport and nothing else. I think the situation should be watched 'live' by the monitoring company and not with their usual delayed reporting to Atty Colangelo and Judge Blawie. I do hope that LE does not have to pay a State Trooper or other member of LE to 'escort' MT to the airport and back as this truly would be a waste of taxpayer dollars IMO.

I continue to be baffled by Atty Colangelo allowing exceptions to the Judges orders regarding staying in CT, as MT has been charged with very serious crimes and yet behaves by all accounts as if 'all is well' and 'nothing to see here'.

IMO MT should be lucky she isn't in jail without bail pending trial as in my mind this would be entirely fair given the tragic circumstances of this case.

I would also think that the idea that MT is in NY could present unease to the Farber family and 5 children and the Judge might be more sensitive to this issue with any future requests to venture into NY from FD and MT.

MOO

This whole thing is beyond baffling. Maybe on her part it is a bit of a PR move in that she is trying to humanize herself to the public, but for the life of me I can't understand why she is allowed these permissions for excursions. Now she's already been to NY and her little ankle bracelet didn't work, and yet they are granting her permission to go again? For the life of me, I just feel like I am missing something. They might as well take it off.... MOO, MOO, MOO.

 

[sds71]

Wooo FD asking for monetary damage. No surprises here.

I’d say it’s a good thing the Court decides what his equal share is but with these Judges it might be a bad thing

 

[afitzy]

BBM Agree. MT has never shown common sense in parenting when it comes to her daughter. The fact that she got into a relationship with a married man with 5 children - who was still living with (and dependent upon) his wife - showed little regard for her daughter's emotional well-being. Whatever MT does is for herself, and for financial gain without the investment of actual work.

She showed complete lack of regard for her daughter when she knowingly participated in the murder of Jennifer - whether in planning, completing, cleaning up, covering up, or all of those.

Now, she's simply visibly throwing her daughter in to the middle of it.

Meanwhile, CT taxpayers are probably paying for her defense...

Your point about the legal fees is well taken.

Will investigate FOIA request both for MT and FD as if the State of CT is paying their legal fees (or any portion thereof) then this should IMO be public information. I keep going back to the information that Atty. P. has never filled out the proper paperwork with the State of CT yet still is periodically assigned public defender type work. Not sure why this is being allowed by the State of CT?

MOO

 

[SkylarSid]

Wooo FD asking for monetary damage. No surprises here.

He is the most malignant narcissist I have ever read about. His feelings of entitlement are downright startling. This man is the stuff of nightmares (Most especially for JFD, MIL, 5 kids and collateral damage to co-dependent MT and even her daughter). I feel so sorry for his MIL and God bless her soul for giving her the strength to fight this sorry excuse of a man; she never deserved to lose a daughter and then to have to fight him tooth and nail to keep his claws from still trying to steal from a cookie jar that was never his to begin with. Bars need to confine him forever. JMO, JMO, JMO.

 

[afitzy]

Farber v. Fore group
No 118.00 11/27/2019 D REQUEST TO AMEND AND AMENDMENT

Defendants' Request for Leave to File Amended Answer (adding 2 Count Counterclaim)

Ongoing delay delay delay tactics IMO. I just wish that some Judge somewhere in the State of CT would/could stop such ongoing abuse.

FD chose to STOP paying anything towards the mortgage on 4Jx in 2018, which he was obligated to do under the terms of the mortgage. The amount of money that he was required to pay each month was a small fraction of what a 'market based' mortgage on 4Jx would have been and YET STILL FD CHOSE TO PAY ZERO.

The entire situation is laughable regarding 4Jx mortgage IMO and then to claim that he has no knowledge of his mistress and her daughter living at 4Jx when on 1 AWs (first one I believe) and her credit reporting documents her legal address has been listed as being 4Jx.

CT State Police no doubt have months and months of MT on CCTV going and entering 4Jx too, but its just par for the course in delay delay delay. What a total abuse of the system IMO. I almost wish the foreclosure system in CT was like AL where the Sheriff shows up and places the contents of the former resident on the curb (regardless of the weather) once the foreclosure is approved or rent hasn't been paid. Gives new meaning to 'kicking someone to the curb'!

MOO

 

[Jmoose]

Wooo FD asking for monetary damage. No surprises here.

He’s got some brass, doesn’t he? He is so full of s***. This is him saying “I killed your daughter, B****, and I’m going to hang this up until you’re dead, too”.

 

[SkylarSid]

Ongoing delay delay delay tactics IMO. I just wish that some Judge somewhere in the State of CT would/could stop such ongoing abuse.

FD chose to STOP paying anything towards the mortgage on 4Jx in 2018, which he was obligated to do under the terms of the mortgage. The amount of money that he was required to pay each month was a small fraction of what a 'market based' mortgage on 4Jx would have been and YET STILL FD CHOSE TO PAY ZERO.

The entire situation is laughable regarding 4Jx mortgage IMO and then to claim that he has no knowledge of his mistress and her daughter living at 4Jx when on 1 AWs (first one I believe) and her credit reporting documents her legal address has been listed as being 4Jx.

CT State Police no doubt have months and months of MT on CCTV going and entering 4Jx too, but its just par for the course in delay delay delay. What a total abuse of the system IMO. I almost wish the foreclosure system in CT was like AL where the Sheriff shows up and places the contents of the former resident on the curb (regardless of the weather) once the foreclosure is approved or rent hasn't been paid. Gives new meaning to 'kicking someone to the curb'!

MOO

He doesn't like to pay anyone. He paid zero in child support also. JMO.

 

[Alathea]

Atty Colangelo supposedly didn't object to the 'trip' to JFK so it looks to be a 'done deal'.
..
I would also think that the idea that MT is in NY could present unease to the Farber family and 5 children and the Judge might be more sensitive to this issue with any future requests to venture into NY from FD and MT.

MOO

RS&BBM - I meant to address this last paragraph before. This is an important point.

Is MT allowed to drive by their (Farbers') house? In the neighborhood? She should not be. They should have a restraining order against her that states a certain distance she needs to stay away (like --- MILES).

 

[Jmoose]

He doesn't like to pay anyone. He paid zero in child support also. JMO.

He only pays himself, it seems-and he gets everything he can get his hands on.
I hope we can find out if the state of Ct is paying for FD and MT’s legal costs. And as, I think Afitzy said, the people of Ct should know this-as taxpayers, it seems to be their right to know how these two are wasting it by making all of these frivolous motions.

 

[afitzy]

I keep circling back to the unfortunate demise of Mama K. Duolos in the driveway of 585 Deercliff after period of unexplained 'accidents' and what appears to be an unresolved head injury and her almost immediate cremation by FD.

Here is the MSN/DM article that has additional information beyond the police report. What I find interesting about the DM reporting is that they seemed to have gone way beyond what the 'reposters' at the Hartford Courant (Dave Alitimari and David Owens) did in looking into what exactly happened to Mama Duolos IMO. The DM actually contacted the Medical Examiners Officer for further information. Sadly in true CT fashion no information was 'available' but I doubt that is true so IMO the DM should make a formal request for any all information on the case as little reported about what happened made sense IMO.

DM Article:
Mother of Connecticut husband arrested in connection with his wife's disappearance died in a freak accident after being run over by Land Rover driven by couple's 24-year-old 'nanny' in their driveway

For some reason I am fixed on this particular quote:

"The report states the driver had no license and the pattern of events 'did not suggest this was a criminal event'. MMMMMMmmmmmm... REALLY???????

1. How is driving a vehicle that had passengers (believed to be the child/ren that screamed) without a licence LEGAL?

2. How can the statement be made that the 'pattern of events did not suggest this was a criminal event'?

Taking the issue of Nanny intent off the table for a moment, the Nanny DROVE OVER MAMA DUOLOS TWICE in the driveway and this act (regardless of whether it was wilful or not) resulted in the DEATH of Mama Duolos. I will have to go back and look through the Codes in CT but just off the top of my head I can think of at least 3 viable charges for the sequence of events that IMO were very poorly documented by Avon PD.

3. "Kleopatra Dulos was taken by ambulance to hospital and passed away shortly afterwards" – "but the information was not shared with the local police" [BBM]. WHY was the information NOT shared with Avon PD or State Police. I would like to know why the Hospital who knew that Mama Duolos was the victim of a car incident DID NOT report the situation and her subsequent death to the State Police? Did FD or another family member perhaps REQUEST that the information on the death of Mama Duolos NOT be reported to LE?

And then the story gets even more twisted IMO:

4. Three months later, on December 10 [BBM], officers followed up on their investigation as 'the police department had only recently learned that Kleopatra Dulos had died shortly after the accident'.

Kudos to the DM for at least trying to get some info from the CME but think its time for some additional reporting on this issue as there must be some information available from the CME IMO.

5. "The Office of the Chief Medical Examiner in Connecticut could provide no further information on Kleopatra Dulos' cause of death to DailyMail.com".

The police took the Land Rover for examination and interviewed the 24-year-old who was 'still employed by the family'.

Both Niora and Fotis Dulos were interviewed by police.

IMO the DM need to do at least a few more FOIA requests to get additional information both from Avon PD and CME.

Where is the CT State Police in all of this as well? I'm still working on the rest of the article as there is quite a lot of information there to unpack as to what exactly WASN'T done by Avon PD to investigate the situation of why an unlicensed driver was out after dark with young children in car alleged to go shopping with an elderly woman who based on what was said in the Avon PD report shouldn't have been out or driving either IMO.

Further the FD 'alibi' I hope was checked and rechecked completely by Avon PD. Did FD return to CT immediately upon hearing that his mother was in hospital or did he simply 'carry on with his ski activities'?

Next to nothing about this entire incident make any sense and IMO the Police work associated with the 'investigation' appears highly suspect as well.

Does anyone see anything about any of this situation that make sense?

MOO