Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #33

[NDreu]

Fotis Dulos in national interview hopes Jennifer Dulos case ‘will be over soon’
Fotis Dulos said in a national interview with Fox News that he has a “doughnut in his heart” because he has no information about how his five children are doing

Those that have been following this tragic case can FINALLY agree with Fd on SOMETHING, namely the hope that the case, "will be over soon".

Fd doesn't have any information about his children because he isn't entitled to it per the orders of the Court. Fd has worked LONG AND HARD in Family Court over more than 2 years to get to the point where he is presently barred from seeing his children. Yes, IMO Fd did everything humanly possible to prove without a shadow of a doubt who he is as a human being, husband and YES a father. Fd actually did such a brilliant 'top of the class' job proving his unfitness to parent that when the eventual and inevitable litigation begins to terminate his parental rights the entire Family Court case file is all that is needed as Exhibits A-Z IMO.

Fd defines "DEADBEAT DAD" on a personal level and a financial level and in fact his picture should be next to the definition of "DEADBEAT DAD" in Websters Dictionary IMO too! Judge Heller IMO did many things that I don't agree with (namely protecting the personal safety of JFd via protective order to start with) in Family Court but she did get it right when she wrote in her order giving temporary custody to GF of the children that Fd is a 'habitual liar who has no problem lying while under oath'.

Flash forward to the Civil Trial and on the stand Fd couldn't even answer a simply yes/no question regarding a matter in Family Court and instead replied that he 'respectfully disagreed' with Judge Heller. On which planet is such a response acceptable and there was not one peep from Judge Noble either unfortunately. Fd has paid no respect to any Court and Judge where he has been heard so far that I can see.

After listening to the FOX interview and reading the SA article, all I can think about is whether delusion is a contagious mental disorder in the Pattisville Camp? Any grasp on reality by Fd and the residents of Pattisville has absolutely hit the high road and is long gone IMO. FIL Estate Owes Fd money (SURE!), FIL and Fd had great relationship (SURE!), and Fd was appreciative of the FIL support (SURE and who wouldn't love growth capital that you only have to pay 3% for when a market proxy for the speculative business Fd was involved with wouldn't even have been available to him even if he offered to pay 30% IMO)!

The ongoing references to 'money flowing both ways' is probably about as big a lie as we have seen from Fd in any of the cases. The civil case shows a long documented history of 'money flowing both ways' until such time as Fd claims he and his father had some kind of 'holy communion' and 'out of body' experience in the delivery room when JFd gave birth to her 5th child and their business relationship became 'more casual'. When did 'more casual' business relationship ever involve not honoring prior loan obligations? I guess this is only something that happens in Fdville and is blessed by Pattisville attys? IMO its all absolute lunacy and I hope Judge Noble sees through the lies and sham created by Fd and Pattisville. Ironically, this timeframe is also used by Fd as when he 'checked out of his marriage'. 2010 was indeed a pivotal year for Fd on many fronts and these were just a few examples.

To read the Pattisville closing brief IMO it is necessary for the reader to sever any connection to the reality of the case as in order for the closing brief to make sense you need to enter the land of make believe and fairy dust where invoices can be materialized 2 years after the discovery process started and submitted at trial and this is all ok. IMO its a total farce and I do hope that when Judge Noble decides against FORE/Fd that he is required to pay any/all legal expenses and court costs incurred by GF. I also very much hope that Judge Noble has the foresight to require a Court Appointed Receiver to handle the collection of the judgment for GF as left to Fd, FORE etc. GF won't be able to collect IMO.

I still don't understand why Judge Noble has allowed ongoing abuse by Fd and Pattisville of the discovery process, including the checks that were photocopied on the way to trial at the local Staples and submitted outside of normal discovery process AFTER a nearly 2 year process to put forward all the evidence for trial. Why did Judge Noble allow this to happen?

Counterclaim from Pattisville that the HF Estate owes Fd/FORE $1,000,000! Again, Why is Judge Noble even entertaining this ongoing abuse of the CT Courts?

IMO Absolute [B[REDACTED]S]!!


MOO

 

[NDreu]

Fotis Dulos in national interview hopes Jennifer Dulos case ‘will be over soon’
Fotis Dulos said in a national interview with Fox News that he has a “doughnut in his heart” because he has no information about how his five children are doing

Those that have been following this tragic case can FINALLY agree with Fd on SOMETHING, namely the hope that the case, "will be over soon".

Fd doesn't have any information about his children because he isn't entitled to it per the orders of the Court. Fd has worked LONG AND HARD in Family Court over more than 2 years to get to the point where he is presently barred from seeing his children. Yes, IMO Fd did everything humanly possible to prove without a shadow of a doubt who he is as a human being, husband and YES a father.

Was Fd thinking about his children as he and MT were driving down Albany Ave. in Hartford and disposing of bloody items with JFd DNA on them?

Was Fd thinking of his children as he drove from Farmington in EE Truck to NC to 69/71 Welles Drive in New Canaan?

Was Fd thinking of his children when he refused to assist in the investigation of the disappearance of JFd when he went to NCPD on 5/25?

At what point in any of the Family Court proceedings did Fd EVER THINK OF HIS CHILDREN?

Was Fd thinking of his children when he started the affair with MT in 2015 and didn't have the courage to 'man up' and leave a relationship that he himself was 'done' in 2010?

Nope. Fd never exhibited any thought or care about his children and now the public is supposed to believe that he misses his children and has a doughnut in his heart due to missing his children?

Really? Absolutely not credible IMO and absolutely consistent with a long documented history of lying too.

Fd defines "DEADBEAT DAD" on a personal level and a financial level and in fact his picture should be next to the definition of "DEADBEAT DAD" in Websters Dictionary IMO too! Judge Heller IMO did many things that I don't agree with (namely protecting the personal safety of JFd via protective order to start with) in Family Court but she did get it right when she wrote in her order giving temporary custody to GF of the children that Fd is a 'habitual liar who has no problem lying while under oath'.

Flash forward to the Civil Trial and on the stand Fd couldn't even answer a simply yes/no question regarding a matter in Family Court and instead replied that he 'respectfully disagreed' with Judge Heller. On which planet is such a response acceptable and there was not one peep from Judge Noble either unfortunately. Fd has paid no respect to any Court and Judge where he has been heard so far that I can see.

AMEN.

After listening to the interview and reading the SA article, all I can think about is whether delusion is a contagious mental disorder in the Pattisville Camp? Any grasp on reality by Fd and the residents of Pattisville has absolutely hit the high road and is long gone IMO. FIL Estate Owes Fd money (SURE!), FIL and Fd had great relationship (SURE!), and Fd was appreciative of the FIL support (SURE and who wouldn't love growth capital that you only have to pay 3% for when a market proxy for the speculative business Fd was involved with wouldn't even have been available to him if he offered to pay 30% IMO)!

To read the Pattisville closing brief IMO it is necessary for the reader to sever any connection to the reality of the case as in order for the closing brief to make sense you need to enter the land of make believe and fairy dust where invoices can be materialized 2 years after the discovery process started and submitted at trial and this is all ok. IMO its a total farce and I do hope that when Judge Noble decides against FORE/Fd that he is required to pay any/all legal expenses and court costs incurred by GF. I also very much hope that Judge Noble has the foresight to require a Court Appointed Receiver to handle the collection of the judgment for GF as left to Fd, FORE etc. GF won't be able to collect.

I still don't understand why Judge Noble has allowed ongoing abuse by Fd and Pattisville of the discovery process, including the checks that were photocopied on the way to trial at the local Staples and submitted outside of normal discovery process AFTER a nearly 2 year process to put forward all the evidence for trial. Why did Judge Noble allow this to happen?

Counterclaim from Pattisville that the HF Estate owes Fd/FORE $1,000,000! Again, Why is Judge Noble even entertaining this ongoing abuse of the CT Courts?

IMO Absolute [B[REDACTED]S]!!

MOO

 

[Daisyeve]

Those that have been following this tragic case can FINALLY agree with Fd on SOMETHING, namely the hope that the case, "will be over soon".

Fd doesn't have any information about his children because he isn't entitled to it per the orders of the Court. Fd has worked LONG AND HARD in Family Court over more than 2 years to get to the point where he is presently barred from seeing his children. Yes, IMO Fd did everything humanly possible to prove without a shadow of a doubt who he is as a human being, husband and YES a father. Fd actually did such a brilliant 'top of the class' job proving his unfitness to parent that when the eventual and inevitable litigation begins to terminate his parental rights the entire Family Court case file is all that is needed as Exhibits A-Z IMO.

Fd defines "DEADBEAT DAD" on a personal level and a financial level and in fact his picture should be next to the definition of "DEADBEAT DAD" in Websters Dictionary IMO too! Judge Heller IMO did many things that I don't agree with (namely protecting the personal safety of JFd via protective order to start with) in Family Court but she did get it right when she wrote in her order giving temporary custody to GF of the children that Fd is a 'habitual liar who has no problem lying while under oath'.

Flash forward to the Civil Trial and on the stand Fd couldn't even answer a simply yes/no question regarding a matter in Family Court and instead replied that he 'respectfully disagreed' with Judge Heller. On which planet is such a response acceptable and there was not one peep from Judge Noble either unfortunately. Fd has paid no respect to any Court and Judge where he has been heard so far that I can see.

After listening to the FOX interview and reading the SA article, all I can think about is whether delusion is a contagious mental disorder in the Pattisville Camp? Any grasp on reality by Fd and the residents of Pattisville has absolutely hit the high road and is long gone IMO. FIL Estate Owes Fd money (SURE!), FIL and Fd had great relationship (SURE!), and Fd was appreciative of the FIL support (SURE and who wouldn't love growth capital that you only have to pay 3% for when a market proxy for the speculative business Fd was involved with wouldn't even have been available to him even if he offered to pay 30% IMO)!

The ongoing references to 'money flowing both ways' is probably about as big a lie as we have seen from Fd in any of the cases. The civil case shows a long documented history of 'money flowing both ways' until such time as Fd claims he and his father had some kind of 'holy communion' and 'out of body' experience in the delivery room when JFd gave birth to her 5th child and their business relationship became 'more casual'. When did 'more casual' business relationship ever involve not honoring prior loan obligations? I guess this is only something that happens in Fdville and is blessed by Pattisville attys? IMO its all absolute lunacy and I hope Judge Noble sees through the lies and sham created by Fd and Pattisville. Ironically, this timeframe is also used by Fd as when he 'checked out of his marriage'. 2010 was indeed a pivotal year for Fd on many fronts and these were just a few examples.

To read the Pattisville closing brief IMO it is necessary for the reader to sever any connection to the reality of the case as in order for the closing brief to make sense you need to enter the land of make believe and fairy dust where invoices can be materialized 2 years after the discovery process started and submitted at trial and this is all ok. IMO its a total farce and I do hope that when Judge Noble decides against FORE/Fd that he is required to pay any/all legal expenses and court costs incurred by GF. I also very much hope that Judge Noble has the foresight to require a Court Appointed Receiver to handle the collection of the judgment for GF as left to Fd, FORE etc. GF won't be able to collect IMO.

I still don't understand why Judge Noble has allowed ongoing abuse by Fd and Pattisville of the discovery process, including the checks that were photocopied on the way to trial at the local Staples and submitted outside of normal discovery process AFTER a nearly 2 year process to put forward all the evidence for trial. Why did Judge Noble allow this to happen?

Counterclaim from Pattisville that the HF Estate owes Fd/FORE $1,000,000! Again, Why is Judge Noble even entertaining this ongoing abuse of the CT Courts?

IMO Absolute [B[REDACTED]S]!!


MOO

Wow! This is great! The pattisville team is an embarrassment to The citizens of Ct and Honest lawyers. What is really going on behind the scenes that is causing the slackness and disregard for what is fair and right? Who is really in control?

 

[sds71]

271.00 12/24/2019 P MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE BRIEF

(Post-Trial Reply Brief)
http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=18378221

272.00 12/24/2019 P OBJECTION

TO COUNTERCLAIM
http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=18378362

 

[sds71]

270.00 12/23/2019 P REPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE AND ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM

http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=18377926

 

[Laughing]

I love Atty. Weinstein & Trustee Dean!

JMHO YMMV LRR

 

[Chicago54]

271.00 12/24/2019 P MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE BRIEF

(Post-Trial Reply Brief)
http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=18378221


Duh! I’ve finally made the connection. We thought the defense dream team went to law school. It’s completely obvious they went to the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry!
A la “The Hair Guys”

 

[Chicago54]

Duh! I’ve finally made the connection. We thought the defense dream team went to law school. It’s completely obvious they went to the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry!
A la “The Hair Guys”

 

[sds71]

Marissa Alter (@MarissaAlter) on Twitter
Christmas Eve marks seven months since Jennifer Dulos disappeared. She was last seen dropping her five kids off at school in New Canaan. Hoping her family finds some peace this holiday as they wait for answers. @News12CT

 

[afitzy]

271.00 12/24/2019 P MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE BRIEF

(Post-Trial Reply Brief)
http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=18378221

272.00 12/24/2019 P OBJECTION

TO COUNTERCLAIM
http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=18378362

Honestly, this Pattisville Circus has gone from 3 rings to 4 rings IMO. Time for the Circus to leave the town too IMO and just keep moving.

Atty Weinstein in his motion explains that he believes what he is experiencing in court is a "...trial by ambush" as he did not know about the counterclaims until AFTER trial and so is unable to defend against them by submitting evidence to refute them.

EXACTLY!

I very much wonder if Judge Noble might need a refresher course on basic Procedure as between the photocopied invoices submitted by Fd/Pattisville and now this post trial counterclaim I really have to seriously question Judge Nobles ability to manage a trial AND his courtroom as this situation IMO is absolutely ridiculous and inappropriate given the rules of the Court and on the face of things these frivolous motions by Fd/Pattisville which have no merit and waste Courts time should simply be tossed.

I do wonder if this all isn't just another last ditch attempt by Pattisville to either appeal themselves or force Atty Weinstein to appeal? Atty. P. stood on the courtroom steps on the day after Trial in Hartford and said that this case was a simple difference of opinion between the parties (facts say otherwise IMO) and that Fd had no intention of making a counterclaim against FIL Estate (well, Pattisville turned around and did precisely this!).

Either Atty. P. didn't have a clue what was going on with Fd or he wound up Fd to make the counterclaim post trial (against basic court procedure allowance IMO) to simply generate some more $$ while Fd has some cash.

I guess the truth and court procedures are both things in short supply in Pattisville. Is there no rule that can't or won't be broken by Pattisville? How low will the bar of compliance with requirements for procedural compliance go in Pattisville? I guess though we haven't reached the bottom yet as if you are an officer of the court and you are 'ok' signing someone else's signature on an affidavit such as Atty. P. did by his own admission in the Jones case then there really is no end to what might be in store for us to sadly watch with Pattisville in 2020.

I keep waiting for some Judge somewhere is simply make the playing field in court level as if one side twists the rules, doesn't comply with the rules or conveniently applies the rules then I'm not sure how the system works. As we have seen, the system doesn't punish non compliance with its rules. Its sad but it seems to be the way of things in CT.

I do hope Judge Noble gets it together and WAKES UP as IMO this entire Civil Case process wasn't really a process so much as a disorganised mess and his inability to maintain control of his courtroom has left the case close to shambles even after the trial completed.

Sad to say but its just another example of the state of things in CT Courtrooms. Watching this has been an eye opener and I do hope the Senior Judiciary are watching too as the ongoing lack of respect and enforcement of procedure is unlike anything I've ever seen.

MOO

 

[CTGrammy]

Honestly, this Pattisville Circus has gone from 3 rings to 4 rings IMO. Time for the Circus to leave the town too IMO and just keep moving.

Atty Weinstein in his motion explains that he believes what he is experiencing in court is a "...trial by ambush" as he did not know about the counterclaims until AFTER trial and so is unable to defend against them by submitting evidence to refute them.

EXACTLY!

I very much wonder if Judge Noble might need a refresher course on basic Procedure as between the photocopied invoices submitted by Fd/Pattisville and now this post trial counterclaim I really have to seriously question Judge Nobles ability to manage a trial AND his courtroom as this situation IMO is absolutely ridiculous and inappropriate given the rules of the Court and on the face of things these frivolous motions by Fd/Pattisville which have no merit and waste Courts time should simply be tossed.

I do wonder if this all isn't just another last ditch attempt by Pattisville to either appeal themselves or force Atty Weinstein to appeal? Atty. P. stood on the courtroom steps on the day after Trial in Hartford and said that this case was a simple difference of opinion between the parties (facts say otherwise IMO) and that Fd had no intention of making a counterclaim against FIL Estate (well, Pattisville turned around and did precisely this!).

Either Atty. P. didn't have a clue what was going on with Fd or he wound up Fd to make the counterclaim post trial (against basic court procedure allowance IMO) to simply generate some more $$ while Fd has some cash.

I guess the truth and court procedures are both things in short supply in Pattisville. Is there no rule that can't or won't be broken by Pattisville? How low will the bar of compliance with requirements for procedural compliance go in Pattisville? I guess though we haven't reached the bottom yet as if you are an officer of the court and you are 'ok' signing someone else's signature on an affidavit such as Atty. P. did by his own admission in the Jones case then there really is no end to what might be in store for us to sadly watch with Pattisville in 2020.

I keep waiting for some Judge somewhere is simply make the playing field in court level as if one side twists the rules, doesn't comply with the rules or conveniently applies the rules then I'm not sure how the system works. As we have seen, the system doesn't punish non compliance with its rules. Its sad but it seems to be the way of things in CT.

I do hope Judge Noble gets it together and WAKES UP as IMO this entire Civil Case process wasn't really a process so much as a disorganised mess and his inability to maintain control of his courtroom has left the case close to shambles even after the trial completed.

Sad to say but its just another example of the state of things in CT Courtrooms. Watching this has been an eye opener and I do hope the Senior Judiciary are watching too as the ongoing lack of respect and enforcement of procedure is unlike anything I've ever seen.

MOO

What if Judge Nobel is allowing Everything IN, so that Fd/Pattisville has no recourse for appeal when he finds in favor of the Plaintiff?

It is the Only thing that makes sense, otherwise, I am at a loss for words.

IMO.

 

[Myvice]

WOW! That's all I can say! Just unbelievable!

 

[sds71]

Jennifer Dulos’ family: We don’t owe Fotis Dulos $1M

*Attorneys representing Jennifer Dulos’ mother are requesting to file an additional brief rebutting Fotis Dulos’ claim — made after the civil trial ended — that she owes him $1 million.
Farber brought the lawsuits against Fotis Dulos more than a year before her daughter went missing as the couple was embroiled in a contentious divorce and custody battle for their five children.
Farber contends in the lawsuits that her son-in-law owes her family $2.5 million in unpaid business loans made to his high-end real estate company, Fore Group.
Weinstein pointed out in a court filing made late Monday that Fotis Dulos did not bring up any of the legal issues, including the counterclaim, during a two-day trial of the lawsuits earlier this month.
Weinstein said he plans to file a motion to have the counterclaim stricken from the record. Hartford Superior Court Judge Cesar Noble is expected to make a decision on the lawsuits in the coming weeks.

**Murray presented evidence during the trial, claiming Weinstein failed to deduct $1.8 million in money Fotis Dulos gave to his father-in-law, Hilliard Farber, and improperly listed about $750,000 in payments to the Fore Group for building a lavish guest house on Farber property in Pound Ridge, N.Y.
Murray claims that when those figures and others he provided in the trial are considered, the Farber family actually owes Fotis Dulos $1,042,300.

 

[afitzy]

Under the category of "THINGS TO WISH FOR IN 2020"! Feel free to add more as this is just the tip of the iceberg so far as I am concerned.

1. CT Judges to enforce their orders and impose penalties for non compliance on BOTH attorneys and Defendants

EXHIBITs A-C regarding this issue:

NYP Article with summary of the FD Greek Interviews.

https://nypost.com/2019/10/01/jenni...laims-she-had-serious-psychological-problems/

Quotes from Article:

Fotis Dulos claims in a new interview his wife, missing Connecticut mother Jennifer Dulos, had “serious psychological problems” that contributed to their marriage falling apart — and became “a hermit.”

The Greek real-estate developer — who has been charged in connection with Jennifer’s disappearance — told Athens website Proto Thematheir relationship began breaking down in 2010.

“Jennifer gradually began to take me out of her life and become increasingly distant, a hermit,” Fotis, 51, said. “I’m sorry to say it, but Jennifer was suffering from serious psychological problems that I didn’t immediately understand.”

“I put it aside because I was in love with her and focused on other things that make our lives beautiful,” Fotis said. [Interesting that this particular issue has been spun inconsistently depending on the interview - here it spun that Fd 'looked the other way' but in other interviews he cites this as an example of why he 'checked out of the marriage'. IMO it all simply seems to be spin and untruth on top of untruth and its simply recycled over and over. MOO].

The interview came after Connecticut Superior Court Judge John Blawie issued a gag order in the case, barring Fotis and his lawyers from blabbing to the media about “the character, credibility, reputation or criminal record of a party, victim or witness.”

Fotis’ lawyer Norm Pattis argued the interview didn’t violate the order, saying “it is not even a close call.”[BBM]


-----------------------------------------------------------------

December 24, 2019

Dear Judge Blawie,

I would respectfully request that you consider imposing penalties on Atty. P., Atty Smith and Fd for their non compliance with your 'gag order'. Attached please find New York Post article dd. 10/1/19 which summarises the 'low points' of the Fd interviews made to the Greek publications in contravention of your 'gag order'.

Thank you
A Very Concerned Citizen of CT

 

[sds71]

In a ruling issued on Dec. 20, a three-member committee concluded that while Pattis was “sloppy” in the Jones case his conduct didn’t rise to the level of an ethical violation.
“We find the respondent credible that he made a mistake and had no intent to deceive the court or opposing counsel,” the panel concluded. “It is the opinion of this reviewing committee that the respondent’s practice was sloppy with regard to the execution of the affidavit and that he exercised bad judgment.”
Judge Bellis took the rare step of referring Pattis after a March 22 status conference where it was revealed that it wasn’t Jones’ signature on an affidavit Pattis submitted to the court but that an agent authorized by him had signed it for him with an attorney present.
The document is devoid of any language that an agent representing Mr. Jones signed their name instead of Mr. Jones himself,” Bellis said in court.
It is the court’s opinion that the affidavit is invalid and that it is a false affidavit,” Bellis said. “In my more than 20 years on the bench I have never sanctioned an attorney and I am not going to do so now, but I am going to refer this to the disciplinary counsel for review.”
Pattis refiled the same affidavit properly signed by Jones and referred himself to the grievance committee on April 12. Bellis made a referral on April 24.

The complaint first went to the New Haven Judicial District grievance Counsel in July, which found there was probable cause that Pattis had violated several rules of professional conduct. A three-member committee — consisting of two lawyer’s and one private citizen — conducted a hearing in October.
Chief Disciplinary Counsel Brian Staines argued that the affidavit submitted by Pattis was “objectively false” because it wasn’t subscribed before Pattis nor was it signed by Jones, according to a three-page ruling by the committee.
Instead the affidavit was signed by another attorney that Jones had authorized to be his representative in Connecticut after Pattis read Jones what the affidavit said over the phone.
The respondent acknowledged he made a mistake in connection with the execution of the affidavit. When he realized his error, he immediately corrected it," the committee ruled.




Statewide Grievance Committee dismisses complaint over false affidavit against lawyer for Alex Jones

 

[CTGrammy]

In a ruling issued on Dec. 20, a three-member committee concluded that while Pattis was “sloppy” in the Jones case his conduct didn’t rise to the level of an ethical violation.
“We find the respondent credible that he made a mistake and had no intent to deceive the court or opposing counsel,” the panel concluded. “It is the opinion of this reviewing committee that the respondent’s practice was sloppy with regard to the execution of the affidavit and that he exercised bad judgment.”
Judge Bellis took the rare step of referring Pattis after a March 22 status conference where it was revealed that it wasn’t Jones’ signature on an affidavit Pattis submitted to the court but that an agent authorized by him had signed it for him with an attorney present.
The document is devoid of any language that an agent representing Mr. Jones signed their name instead of Mr. Jones himself,” Bellis said in court.
It is the court’s opinion that the affidavit is invalid and that it is a false affidavit,” Bellis said. “In my more than 20 years on the bench I have never sanctioned an attorney and I am not going to do so now, but I am going to refer this to the disciplinary counsel for review.”
Pattis refiled the same affidavit properly signed by Jones and referred himself to the grievance committee on April 12. Bellis made a referral on April 24.

The complaint first went to the New Haven Judicial District grievance Counsel in July, which found there was probable cause that Pattis had violated several rules of professional conduct. A three-member committee — consisting of two lawyer’s and one private citizen — conducted a hearing in October.
Chief Disciplinary Counsel Brian Staines argued that the affidavit submitted by Pattis was “objectively false” because it wasn’t subscribed before Pattis nor was it signed by Jones, according to a three-page ruling by the committee.
Instead the affidavit was signed by another attorney that Jones had authorized to be his representative in Connecticut after Pattis read Jones what the affidavit said over the phone.
The respondent acknowledged he made a mistake in connection with the execution of the affidavit. When he realized his error, he immediately corrected it," the committee ruled.




Statewide Grievance Committee dismisses complaint over false affidavit against lawyer for Alex Jones

Seriously? NP is like Teflon.

What does NP have on all these Judges that Not a Single Judge in CT will Stand Up Against His Antics? (Except for the Judge who caught the Forged signature)

It is NP's Job to make sure Everything is in Order Prior to Filing Court Documents.

NP KNEW EXACTLY What He Was Doing and he either did not care or just thought the Judge would Not Notice.

How Many Times Has NP Jumped Over The Line and was Not Caught?

IF NP does it Once, then He Has Definitely Done it More Than Once.

NP thinks that he can just say - 'That Was a Mistake Judge' and then everything is okay?

By NP's Own Words, he 'Gambles With His License Daily'.

NP LOVES to Push The Envelope and he thinks that if caught, he can just say That He Did Not Know or Did Not Notice.

The old saying goes - 'It is Easier To Ask For Forgiveness than to Ask for Permission'. The problem with this statement, is that NP NEVER Asks For Forgiveness when he gets caught.

NP NEVER says that it will Not Happen Again because He KNOWS that it will Absolutely Happen Again.

EVERY Single Time a Judge Lets NP Get Away With His ANTICS, the MORE He is Going to Push The Envelope.

Just Like a Child, NP is Testing the Waters to See What He Can Get Away With and Each and Every Day He Pushes More and More.

My Message To The CT Judiciary -- MAKE IT STOP.

WHY does NP Not have to Abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct?

WHY does NP Not have to Abide by a Gag Order?

WHY does NP Not have to Abide by the Rules in Family Court in regards the release of the Sealed Family Court Documents?

WHY does NP Not have to Jump Through the Hoops to become a Verified Public Defender?

WHY does NP Not have to Re-Write His Legal Documents so that Everyone does not have to read his Illegible Pitter Patter?

WHY is NP Allowed to Speak Over The Judge in Court?

WHY is NP NOT Sanctioned in Any of the Issues?

WHY does this Continue?

Etc, etc, etc.

NP referring himself to the CT Grievance Committee Before the Judge submitted his referral, Indicates that NP wanted it to 'look' like it was all just a big mistake and no harm done.

IF NP Immediately Realized the Mistake, then Why did NP NOT Immediately Inform the Court?

NO, Instead NP Waits Until After the Judge reads the document and when Confronted he tries to say that it was All a Mistake.

NP had Absolutely NO Intention of Informing the Court and Thought that he would Not be Caught.

IMO.

 

[pernickety]

Seriously? NP is like Teflon.

What does NP have on all these Judges that Not a Single Judge in CT will Stand Up Against His Antics? (Except for the Judge who caught the Forged signature)

It is NP's Job to make sure Everything is in Order Prior to Filing Court Documents.

NP KNEW EXACTLY What He Was Doing and he either did not care or just thought the Judge would Not Notice.

How Many Times Has NP Jumped Over The Line and was Not Caught?

IF NP does it Once, then He Has Definitely Done it More Than Once.

NP thinks that he can just say - 'That Was a Mistake Judge' and then everything is okay?

By NP's Own Words, he 'Gambles With His License Daily'.

NP LOVES to Push The Envelope and he thinks that if caught, he can just say That He Did Not Know or Did Not Notice.

The old saying goes - 'It is Easier To Ask For Forgiveness than to Ask for Permission'. The problem with this statement, is that NP NEVER Asks For Forgiveness when he gets caught.

NP NEVER says that it will Not Happen Again because He KNOWS that it will Absolutely Happen Again.

EVERY Single Time a Judge Lets NP Get Away With His ANTICS, the MORE He is Going to Push The Envelope.

Just Like a Child, NP is Testing the Waters to See What He Can Get Away With and Each and Every Day He Pushes More and More.

My Message To The CT Judiciary -- MAKE IT STOP.

WHY does NP Not have to Abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct?

WHY does NP Not have to Abide by a Gag Order?

WHY does NP Not have to Abide by the Rules in Family Court in regards the release of the Sealed Family Court Documents?

WHY does NP Not have to Jump Through the Hoops to become a Verified Public Defender?

WHY does NP Not have to Re-Write His Legal Documents so that Everyone does not have to read his Illegible Pitter Patter?

WHY is NP Allowed to Speak Over The Judge in Court?

WHY is NP NOT Sanctioned in Any of the Issues?

WHY does this Continue?

Etc, etc, etc.

NP referring himself to the CT Grievance Committee Before the Judge submitted his referral, Indicates that NP wanted it to 'look' like it was all just a big mistake and no harm done.

IF NP Immediately Realized the Mistake, then Why did NP NOT Immediately Inform the Court?

NO, Instead NP Waits Until After the Judge reads the document and when Confronted he tries to say that it was All a Mistake.

NP had Absolutely NO Intention of Informing the Court and Thought that he would Not be Caught.

IMO.

Here’s a quote from the HC article a few months ago reporting Judge Bellis’ referral of Pattis to the Chief Disciplinary Counsel: “After the hearing Pattis said he stood by his decision to submit the affidavit signed by Jones’ agent.”

If anyone can’t get the first HC article on it, “Lawyer for Alex Jones faces possible censure for submitting false affidavit”

try this link:

False flag journalist's attorney referred for sanctions for submitting fake affadavit. Maybe he ate some hot chili

And read the comments.

 

[Jmoose]

Honestly, this Pattisville Circus has gone from 3 rings to 4 rings IMO. Time for the Circus to leave the town too IMO and just keep moving.

Atty Weinstein in his motion explains that he believes what he is experiencing in court is a "...trial by ambush" as he did not know about the counterclaims until AFTER trial and so is unable to defend against them by submitting evidence to refute them.

EXACTLY!

I very much wonder if Judge Noble might need a refresher course on basic Procedure as between the photocopied invoices submitted by Fd/Pattisville and now this post trial counterclaim I really have to seriously question Judge Nobles ability to manage a trial AND his courtroom as this situation IMO is absolutely ridiculous and inappropriate given the rules of the Court and on the face of things these frivolous motions by Fd/Pattisville which have no merit and waste Courts time should simply be tossed.

I do wonder if this all isn't just another last ditch attempt by Pattisville to either appeal themselves or force Atty Weinstein to appeal? Atty. P. stood on the courtroom steps on the day after Trial in Hartford and said that this case was a simple difference of opinion between the parties (facts say otherwise IMO) and that Fd had no intention of making a counterclaim against FIL Estate (well, Pattisville turned around and did precisely this!).

Either Atty. P. didn't have a clue what was going on with Fd or he wound up Fd to make the counterclaim post trial (against basic court procedure allowance IMO) to simply generate some more $$ while Fd has some cash.

I guess the truth and court procedures are both things in short supply in Pattisville. Is there no rule that can't or won't be broken by Pattisville? How low will the bar of compliance with requirements for procedural compliance go in Pattisville? I guess though we haven't reached the bottom yet as if you are an officer of the court and you are 'ok' signing someone else's signature on an affidavit such as Atty. P. did by his own admission in the Jones case then there really is no end to what might be in store for us to sadly watch with Pattisville in 2020.

I keep waiting for some Judge somewhere is simply make the playing field in court level as if one side twists the rules, doesn't comply with the rules or conveniently applies the rules then I'm not sure how the system works. As we have seen, the system doesn't punish non compliance with its rules. Its sad but it seems to be the way of things in CT.

I do hope Judge Noble gets it together and WAKES UP as IMO this entire Civil Case process wasn't really a process so much as a disorganised mess and his inability to maintain control of his courtroom has left the case close to shambles even after the trial completed.

Sad to say but its just another example of the state of things in CT Courtrooms. Watching this has been an eye opener and I do hope the Senior Judiciary are watching too as the ongoing lack of respect and enforcement of procedure is unlike anything I've ever seen.

MOO

I am getting the feeling that Noble isn’t going to get it together; the sense I am getting is that he might find equal amounts of fault on both parties-as if the Farbers are as equally sloppy in their business dealings as FD and co. At least, it wouldn’t surprise me even a little if he does. Starting to get depressed that nobody in the CT Judiciary is smart and motivated enough to wade through the messes typically created by people like FD and his legal “team”.

 

[sds71]

Dulos v. Dulos
539.00 12/26/2019 D MOTION TO DISMISS

540.00 12/26/2019 D MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION

 

[sds71]

Courant
Fotis Dulos, the estranged husband of missing mother Jennifer Farber Dulos who police believe played a role in her disappearance, wants a judge to dismiss his divorce case so he can take the fight over guardianship of the couple’s five children to juvenile court.

Shortly before Thanksgiving, a probate judge removed both Fotis Dulos and Jennifer Farber Dulos as guardians of their children and legally turned custody of them over to their grandmother Gloria Farber, according to a seven-page motion filed Thursday by Dulos’ attorney, Rich Rochlin.
The probate hearings were held behind closed doors without Dulos present. In his motion, Rochlin said that Dulos is appealing the probate court ruling to juvenile court where a hearing is scheduled in Stamford on Jan. 9.


In his motion Rochlin said that Dulos is willing to risk testifying at a hearing in an effort to see his children again.

“Mr. Dulos intends to seek access to his children in the Juvenile or Probate Court and is prepared for a full evidentiary hearing in support of the same,” Rochlin said. “It appears that there is no good cause why this Court should not dismiss the instant action and permit the remaining issues to be adjudicated in that forum.”

Dulos, 52, also is scheduled to appear in criminal court that day. His attorneys recently had the criminal court date moved to coincide with the juvenile case.
Fotis Dulos seeks to end divorce case with missing wife, Jennifer Farber Dulos, and take fight over guardianship of children to juvenile court