I beat the Malignant Narc in court last week. I sent flowers to my lawyer's office. The flowers were purple.I’d send flowers but they’d be purple.
I beat the Malignant Narc in court last week. I sent flowers to my lawyer's office. The flowers were purple.I’d send flowers but they’d be purple.
Just scroll down on linkIs there a photo of this? Thank you.
Agreed. A lot of these evaluators, psyche etc aren’t so great. From my experience, the good ones are so busy that they don’t have time or the need to do this type of work. Not trying to insult anybody. Just my beliefs and experience. Bell curve, as in all things...RSBM:
My Malignant Narc/Sociopath also had a psychological evaluation about 10 years before I met him. It was due to a DUI that he ran out on in a different state. The psychologist stated that he was a normal person with no personality disorders. I now know that facts stated by the ex were 100% lies. The ex kept the letter stating that he was fully a functioning and decent individual. He cherished that evaluation. He got over on the psychologist. It's easy to do. IME.
What a read!I have a question for Rich here. No doubt he’d have the answer here!
TAMFORD — Fotis Dulos has undergone two psychological evaluations since his wife filed for divorce in 2017 and has been deemed a “gregarious and confident person” with no psychopathic tendencies, according to the latest in a series of motions filed in the heated custody dispute.
Attorney Rich Rochlin filed the motion late Tuesday in Stamford family court in response to his client’s mother-in-law, Gloria Farber, calling for Fotis Dulos to be psychologically evaluated.”
Attorney: Doctor evaluations of Jennifer Dulos’ husband show no psychopathic tendencies
hey there Rich! Question for you. Was FD resisting to be analyzed or did y’all do some pin the tail on the donkey stuff in the office? Just curious to see how your gregarious and confident *** client is hanging on.
I’d send flowers but they’d be purple.
Each side picks evaluators that will be favorable to them. I have seen it many times in cases. Take this evaluation with a grain of salt...JMOAgreed. A lot of these evaluators, psyche etc aren’t so great. From my experience, the good ones are so busy that they don’t have time or the need to do this type of work. Not trying to insult anybody. Just my beliefs and experience. Bell curve, as in all things...
Yep. I guess FDs attorneys forgot to mention in the footnotes or whatever that he was a murdering suicidal mooching lying toad stool. His attorneys really suck. How much was he paying them? Or whoever or whatever?What a read!
MOO.
Do you think AC and MT look alike?Ithe DM
yeah, i agree. the way i understand it the state has told NP to save that evidence cause they want to see it. i might be wrong.They've lied about that all along, too. Nothing new at all.
But the biggest why of all:
Why try to off yourself if there is, as they claim, proof of your innocence?
Me too! She's much more attractive than MT and I bet MT knew her...jmoIthe DM
VERY on-brand for him. Blech...
I beat the Malignant Narc in court last week. I sent flowers to my lawyer's office. The flowers were purple.
MT is the ramshackle version of ACDo you think AC and MT look alike?
Daily Mail on FDs ‘best friend’ Anna Curry
Fotis Dulos had new girlfriend who fronted $150,000 for his bond | Daily Mail Online
Do you think AC and MT look alike?
Great, we're in for more Pattis drama. I see him now, rolling out the red suitcase to a presser, stating "The evidence is right here that will prove the man I shepherded was innocent. Evidence that caused an innocent man to commit suicide rather than go to trial with it"
The state is who got the evidence to begin with - and NP requested that THEY preserve it - IMO.yeah, i agree. the way i understand it the state has told NP to save that evidence cause they want to see it. i might be wrong.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.