Rubbish is right! Attorney Pattis should be persona non grata in the court system moving forward. Anytime Attorney Pattis shows up in court with a bond package for a client it should be checked and double checked and triple checked and signed off by the CT Insurance Dept before Attorney Pattis' client is released. Cool your heels. End of the line. We will call you when the paperwork is in order, Attorney Pattis. MOO.
Agree.
The issue I have is that Atty. P. IMO was 'all over' the cobbling together of this bond from the $1,250 taken from GV to AC to the Atty. P. PI etc.
Nobody has more info on Fd and his civil legal issues than Atty. P., so I wonder how could Atty. P. have NOT KNOWN this bond was a fraud? Did he not care because he found a 'live one' in Palmetto to issue a bond certificate where they got the State wrong?
We heard Atty. P. trying to explain all this away by saying there were 'title issues' associated with the bond. OF COURSE there were title issues with the bond but that wasn't the problem!
The PROBLEM was that there was insufficient collateral and I don't understand why nobody has used the word fraud to explain what happened?
Atty. P. IMO was intimately involved with this bond, knew the properties put up, knew about the 2 foreclosures and knew that AC didn't have the personal net worth to support a $3 million unsecured note.
Can Atty. P. be first investigated and then prosecuted for his role in what very much appears to be FRAUD?
We also have the related issue of the Fd signature on the $1,000 check from People's Bank for the bond. Folks here on WS looked at the signature as it appears to bear a very close relationship to that of AC and NOT Fd historical signature. Does AC have a POA to allow her to sign Fd name (unknown info but if she did then why not sign her name using the POA and not sign Fd????). Did Atty. P. tell AC to simply sign the name of Fd absent a POA and hope that it wouldn't be caught or reviewed? Didn't People's Bank review the signature and see that it wasn't at all similar to Fd historical signature that they no doubt had on file???
No wonder Atty. P. quickly moved to file the 'Joan of Arc' and 'Release of Discovery' motions and then further created the Greek Family Memorial situation at 4Jx to simply take the eyes of the Press OFF of what had just happened in Court regarding the BOND IMO.
I don't know how the State of CT can allow this situation to NOT be investigated and censure applied. I would also like to know if this matter has been referred to the CT Bar and Judiciary Review as the reality is that the State of CT released a person accused of a violent crime and DID NOT have a valid bond in place.
YIKES and WOW! Cannot believe this is all being swept under the rug in Hartford.
MOO