Deceased/Not Found CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #50

[mom2chloe]

Agree.It's very fuzzy. Christopher Hug, as of Friday, had not revealed the contents. Did he do that over the weekend? And, is the friend of the family the person that identified the pieces that were there? The watches,the ring, the coins and crosses and knew the meaning behind them? More will be revealed in due time.
Sickens me to think these precious things will go to the creditors.
FD is stripping GF and his own children from the grave.
Maybe his family will get on board and try to claim the coins and crosses?
MOO.

FD continues to screw people over especially his family even from the grave. Ugh

 

[Laughing]

FD continues to screw people over especially his family even from the grave. Ugh

Spot-on assessment.

 

[LosAngeles]

They may be entitled, as you say, but why are they first? Gloria Farber surely is also entitled to what she has spent on the mortgage on that monstrosity at 4JC, and yet, she is going to end up with nothing-although it might have been worth it to her to be FD’s landlord before he killed himself-

I'm not at all familiar with the Dulos estate (I glean it's quite complicated), yet, in a simple estate, when a person passes away with debt, the estate must pay the 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc...secured lien's/lenders in order of the date of the deed, so if the Farber's have any secured loans in the mix, they will be paid IF there are any assets remaining after the folks before them were paid by the estate. I'm not sure if that answers your question, but I bet this will all surface soon. She's well represented and her team of ethical attorneys wouldn't let her spend a dime if it wasn't worth it! Plus, she's a smart cookie!

 

[pernickety]

I'm not at all familiar with the Dulos estate (I glean it's quite complicated), yet, in a simple estate, when a person passes away with debt, the estate must pay the 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc...secured lien's/lenders in order of the date of the deed, so if the Farber's have any secured loans in the mix, they will be paid IF there are any assets remaining after the folks before them were paid by the estate. I'm not sure if that answers your question, but I bet this will all surface soon. She's well represented and her team of ethical attorneys wouldn't let her spend a dime if it wasn't worth it! Plus, she's a smart cookie!

http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=HHDCV206131504S

Weinstein and Hug slugging it out in civil court over who gets the Pattis $250,000 retainer fee—Hilliard Farber estate or Fotis Dulos estate? Pattis’ counsel has filed a motion to dismiss. Hug has apparently filed a motion to intervene in the Farber v. Pattis case. Didn’t see Hug’s motion, but Weinstein’s objection is posted. What a kettle of fish!
2011 Connecticut Code Title 45a Probate Courts ... - Justia Law

 

[pernickety]

I know it’s far fetched but maybe KM has made a quiet deal and this would be a symbolic gift and a redemption kind of meaning—and a gift to JD’s kids and all if something does move and she is found or justice is at least furthered. MOO.

Far-fetched, maybe, but maybe insightful. Wonderfully creative thinking!

 

[Niner]

So the current court appearance timelines are as follows:
10.01.2020 MT Tampering - Physical Evidence & Conspiracy to commit tampering
11.05.2020 KM Violation of Protective Order & Sexual Assault/spouse etc...
11.27.2020 MT Conspiracy to Commit Murder
12.24.2020 KM Conspiracy to Commit Murder

Okay -for MT -

from my notes:

8/28/20 Update: Troconis hearing beginning. Colangelo is asking for sanctions on Schoenhorn for sending evidence to media without getting the okay from the prosecution. Schoenhorn sent out several pieces of discovery including videos showing Fotis Dulos disposing of evidence. Colangelo says Attorney Jon Schoenhorn has been provided all outstanding discovery. Judge Blawie says he’ll take the motion for sanctions under advisement. Wants to move on to the purpose of this hearing—removing non-financial bond conditions including GPS monitoring, house arrest, intensive probation, and travel restrictions in US. Judge Blawie: No point addressing venue due to prejudice because trial is way down the road. Something that can be taken up closer to then. Schoenhorn: the allegations against Troconis supposedly happened in the Hartford Judicial District, not in Stamford. Wants an evidentiary hearing (Franks hearing) to decide this. Colangelo: if Schoenhorn is trying to argue to change jurisdiction, then there should be no change to her bond conditions today because down the road it might not matter. Blawie: rules that Troconis no longer has to be part of intensive probation program. Prosecution agreed to this. Every other condition remains in effect while he reviews the arguments for GPS, house arrest, & travel. Says will issue written decision in next couple weeks. Blawie says ruling will come by mid-September. Next court date is Oct 2, 10am for case #0241178T (conspiracy to commit murder) & on 11/27/20.


So - I have Oct. 2nd hearing for her conspiracy to commit murder & on 11/27/20. Is that NOT correct?
TIA!

 

[LosAngeles]

Last, First: TROCONIS MICHELLE Represented By: 101793 J.L.SCHOENHORN
Birth Year: 1974 Times on the Docket: 13
Docket Information
Docket No: FST -CR20-0241178-T Arresting Agency: CSP TROOP G
Companion:
Program: Arrest Date: 1/7/2020
Court: Stamford JD Bond Amount: $1,500,000 (This case only)
Bond Type: Professional Surety
Miscellaneous: (Released From Custody)
Activity: Pre-Trial Next Court Date: 11/27/2020 10:00 AM
Current Charges
Statute Description Class Type Occ Offense Date Plea Verdict Finding
53a-54a CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MURDER B Felony 1 5/24/2019 Not Guilty

Looks like the conspiracy charge court date was changed. Hard to keep track of all of these postponements!

 

[Tink56]

http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=HHDCV206131504S

Weinstein and Hug slugging it out in civil court over who gets the Pattis $250,000 retainer fee—Hilliard Farber estate or Fotis Dulos estate? Pattis’ counsel has filed a motion to dismiss. Hug has apparently filed a motion to intervene in the Farber v. Pattis case. Didn’t see Hug’s motion, but Weinstein’s objection is posted. What a kettle of fish!
2011 Connecticut Code Title 45a Probate Courts ... - Justia Law

The battle between Hug and Weinstein is rich! I'd wager that NP co-authored the motion to dismiss by his attorney. I'm personally sick of the attorneys arguing at $350-500/hour over funds that should be going to the children for their education, start in adult life, etc.
Here's Attorney Williams motion:
http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=19457008

Thanks for the information about Order of Payments for estates, also. It was interesting that the labor and mechanic liens were limited in time: "all claims due any laborer or mechanic for personal wages for labor performed by such laborer or mechanic for the decedent within three months immediately before the decease of such person."

2011 Connecticut Code Title 45a Probate Courts ... - Justia Law

 

[Tink56]

Okay -for MT -

from my notes:

8/28/20 Update: Troconis hearing beginning. Colangelo is asking for sanctions on Schoenhorn for sending evidence to media without getting the okay from the prosecution. Schoenhorn sent out several pieces of discovery including videos showing Fotis Dulos disposing of evidence. Colangelo says Attorney Jon Schoenhorn has been provided all outstanding discovery. Judge Blawie says he’ll take the motion for sanctions under advisement. Wants to move on to the purpose of this hearing—removing non-financial bond conditions including GPS monitoring, house arrest, intensive probation, and travel restrictions in US. Judge Blawie: No point addressing venue due to prejudice because trial is way down the road. Something that can be taken up closer to then. Schoenhorn: the allegations against Troconis supposedly happened in the Hartford Judicial District, not in Stamford. Wants an evidentiary hearing (Franks hearing) to decide this. Colangelo: if Schoenhorn is trying to argue to change jurisdiction, then there should be no change to her bond conditions today because down the road it might not matter. Blawie: rules that Troconis no longer has to be part of intensive probation program. Prosecution agreed to this. Every other condition remains in effect while he reviews the arguments for GPS, house arrest, & travel. Says will issue written decision in next couple weeks. Blawie says ruling will come by mid-September. Next court date is Oct 2, 10am for case #0241178T (conspiracy to commit murder) & on 11/27/20.


So - I have Oct. 2nd hearing for her conspiracy to commit murder & on 11/27/20. Is that NOT correct?
TIA!

Didn't Judge Blawie promise a ruling within 2 weeks on Shoenhorn's motions? Wonder when that will happen, also.

 

[Jmoose]

http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=HHDCV206131504S

Weinstein and Hug slugging it out in civil court over who gets the Pattis $250,000 retainer fee—Hilliard Farber estate or Fotis Dulos estate? Pattis’ counsel has filed a motion to dismiss. Hug has apparently filed a motion to intervene in the Farber v. Pattis case. Didn’t see Hug’s motion, but Weinstein’s objection is posted. What a kettle of fish!
2011 Connecticut Code Title 45a Probate Courts ... - Justia Law

Thanks for this information. I am actually surprised that taxes aren’t first in line! I guess since lawyers wrote the code, that they are naturally going to be at or near the head of the line.

 

[Niner]

Didn't Judge Blawie promise a ruling within 2 weeks on Shoenhorn's motions? Wonder when that will happen, also.

Yes - per my notes:

Blawie says ruling will come by mid-September.

It 'tis mid-September!

 

[Niner]

Last, First: TROCONIS MICHELLE Represented By: 101793 J.L.SCHOENHORN
Birth Year: 1974 Times on the Docket: 13
Docket Information
Docket No: FST -CR20-0241178-T Arresting Agency: CSP TROOP G
Companion:
Program: Arrest Date: 1/7/2020
Court: Stamford JD Bond Amount: $1,500,000 (This case only)
Bond Type: Professional Surety
Miscellaneous: (Released From Custody)
Activity: Pre-Trial Next Court Date: 11/27/2020 10:00 AM
Current Charges
Statute Description Class Type Occ Offense Date Plea Verdict Finding
53a-54a CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MURDER B Felony 1 5/24/2019 Not Guilty

Looks like the conspiracy charge court date was changed. Hard to keep track of all of these postponements!

Thanks for the confirmation - changing my notes!

 

[pernickety]

The battle between Hug and Weinstein is rich! I'd wager that NP co-authored the motion to dismiss by his attorney. I'm personally sick of the attorneys arguing at $350-500/hour over funds that should be going to the children for their education, start in adult life, etc.
Here's Attorney Williams motion:
http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=19457008

Thanks for the information about Order of Payments for estates, also. It was interesting that the labor and mechanic liens were limited in time: "all claims due any laborer or mechanic for personal wages for labor performed by such laborer or mechanic for the decedent within three months immediately before the decease of such person."

2011 Connecticut Code Title 45a Probate Courts ... - Justia Law

My guess: NP's cowboy law clerk did a lot of the work on it. When he argues the complaint didn't give enough facts--so that would mean a "motion to strike" for legal insufficiency would be the response, not a motion to dismiss. MTS means plaintiff gets to do it over to make it legally sufficient. Hope RW takes opportunity to put in not only more facts but attaches evidence, like the retainer agreement and a copy of P&S's biz account, or any other place where the $$$$ went. Also, a motion to dismiss needs to be accompanied by evidence to present at an evidentiary hearing--affidavits, etc.

I wonder if the first retainer NP got-- when he first came on the case and the charge was obstruction with the investigation--was fully expended. Remember that video interview NP did with the WFSB reporter, when he said, "Mr. Green is in the house" and "If he wants to pay us more we would be glad to accept it"?

 

[Tink56]

My guess: NP's cowboy law clerk did a lot of the work on it. When he argues the complaint didn't give enough facts--so that would mean a "motion to strike" for legal insufficiency would be the response, not a motion to dismiss. MTS means plaintiff gets to do it over to make it legally sufficient. Hope RW takes opportunity to put in not only more facts but attaches evidence, like the retainer agreement and a copy of P&S's biz account, or any other place where the $$$$ went. Also, a motion to dismiss needs to be accompanied by evidence to present at an evidentiary hearing--affidavits, etc.

I wonder if the first retainer NP got-- when he first came on the case and the charge was obstruction with the investigation--was fully expended. Remember that video interview NP did with the WFSB reporter, when he said, "Mr. Green is in the house" and "If he wants to pay us more we would be glad to accept it"?

Ah...much more astute than my meager "legal" reading skills. It would be wonderful to see details of NP's agreement.

Once the charges were upped to murder, does that change the fee and retainer parameters?

Mr. Green was continiuing to give even while FD was suffering in jail and afraid to spend another night there. So puzzling....or not!?

 

[Seattle1]

http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=HHDCV206131504S

Weinstein and Hug slugging it out in civil court over who gets the Pattis $250,000 retainer fee—Hilliard Farber estate or Fotis Dulos estate? Pattis’ counsel has filed a motion to dismiss. Hug has apparently filed a motion to intervene in the Farber v. Pattis case. Didn’t see Hug’s motion, but Weinstein’s objection is posted. What a kettle of fish!
2011 Connecticut Code Title 45a Probate Courts ... - Justia Law

The Farber Estate won a civil judgement from FD and if I remember correctly, I believe their lawsuit requested the retainer by Pattis returned to FD's estate where they are in position to collect.

Yes, a kettle but not sure that it's fish in that kettle!

 

[pernickety]

Ah...much more astute than my meager "legal" reading skills. It would be wonderful to see details of NP's agreement.

Once the charges were upped to murder, does that change the fee and retainer parameters?

Mr. Green was continiuing to give even while FD was suffering in jail and afraid to spend another night there. So puzzling....or not!?

I remember Weinstein said in complaint that the retainer for $250,000 was signed in January. To me that means there must've been 2 retainer agreements--the other one being the one signed when NP first came on the case (in June?) when FD had not yet been charged with murder, but only hindering prosecution.

Wondering, too, about any retainer fees given by FD to attorneys Rochlin and Murray. They couldn't have been all square on how much was expended or on work done and not paid for. They were either creditors or owed the estate.

 

[pernickety]

The Farber Estate won a civil judgement from FD and if I remember correctly, I believe their lawsuit requested the retainer by Pattis returned to FD's estate where they are in position to collect.

Yes, a kettle but not sure that it's fish in that kettle!

I looked at complaint again. It asks for either "avoidance of the transfer", which I guess would mean it could go back to estate, OR "judgment against the law firm." Then says the law firm disbursed the funds to NP, and it asks for a judgment against NP (personally) in that amount--and also an accounting as to the disbursement of the funds. Eager to see that!

 

[Jmoose]

I remember Weinstein said in complaint that the retainer for $250,000 was signed in January. To me that means there must've been 2 retainer agreements--the other one being the one signed when NP first came on the case (in June?) when FD had not yet been charged with murder, but only hindering prosecution.

Wondering, too, about any retainer fees given by FD to attorneys Rochlin and Murray. They couldn't have been all square on how much was expended or on work done and not paid for. They were either creditors or owed the estate.

Trust me-when they get around to it, Rochlin and Murray will be creditors, even if they’re really debtors-just how these guys work, with their creative accounting practices

 

[Tink56]

Trust me-when they get around to it, Rochlin and Murray will be creditors, even if they’re really debtors-just how these guys work, with their creative accounting practices

Indeed, NP pulled both Murray and Rochlin into FD's web after FD's former attorney abandoned the cause.

Then Chris LaTronica was hired as, it appeared, a babysitter for FD. (Smith seemed to have very little empathy for FD). LaTronica came into the fray as NP was overwhelmed with possible new clients in D.C. and, of course, his tenure with Alec Smith.

Oh, then of course is NP's private investigator who is a Casey Anthony savior..McKenna, right?

We really need to have an accounting of the number of attorneys, firms, etc. who want part of the estate including Attorney Hug. What a crew....Egads!

 

[LosAngeles]

Indeed, NP pulled both Murray and Rochlin into FD's web after FD's former attorney abandoned the cause.

Then Chris LaTronica was hired as, it appeared, a babysitter for FD. (Smith seemed to have very little empathy for FD). LaTronica came into the fray as NP was overwhelmed with possible new clients in D.C. and, of course, his tenure with Alec Smith.

Oh, then of course is NP's private investigator who is a Casey Anthony savior..McKenna, right?

We really need to have an accounting of the number of attorneys, firms, etc. who want part of the estate including Attorney Hug. What a crew....Egads!

09/16/2020

Here we go again!

This notification is brought to you by the Connecticut Statewide Automated Victim Information and Notification (SAVIN) Program.

This email is to inform you that KENT MAWHINNEY, with docket number FST CR200241179T, has an upcoming court event.

A/An Hearing has been scheduled for 12/28/2020. This will take place in Stamford-Norwalk JD Courthouse located at the following address: 123 Hoyt Street, Stamford, CT.

Please be aware that there is often more than one case scheduled for a particular date in this court. Please visit www.jud.ct.gov to check for any updates that may be available on this case.

For more information, contact the Office of Victim Services at 1-800-822-8428. For updates about this case or for driving directions to the courthouse, you can visit www.jud.ct.gov.