Deceased/Not Found CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #50

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #461
I distinctly remember MT and Bowman asking for permission to pick up MT’s daughter at JFK around the holidays, and permission was granted for her to do so. JS is delusional; MT definitely got permission.

I think JS was talking about something more recent, BUT he wouldn't give Colangelo the date.

MT knew what was done before. She could have told JS the procedure from earlier or JS could have asked Bowman. Schoenhorn just enjoys exaggerating and dare I say, maybe obfuscating to try to dramatize his case. Attorney Colangelo was quite civil, IMO, considering the immature way Schoenhorn was acting.

Wish the TV cameras would have focused on the attorneys when Schoenhorn said, "Let me talk to Attorney Colangelo for a minute." Schoenhorn's little snit after their interchange was a classic STUNT. Loved that Colangelo agreed that they don't agree on anything. I really expect more professional, serious behavior when the case involves the death of the mother to five children. JMO...IMOO
 
  • #462
OK, I need some help here.

Please tell me I'm not the only one that believes we saw a video of MT pushing the FedEx envelope through a street grate to the storm drain? TIA

ETA: And where is @afitzy when you need her!
 
  • #463
With the new charges they should of raised her bail and added more restrictions. She’s just as guilty as dulos in my opinion. Such a disgusting person she is

It just upsets me to no end that MT and company act like this is a frivolous matter and they harp on how close their family is. What about JFD and her kids and family? It is so callous and rude. MOO.
 
  • #464
Seriously, who allegedly throws gum out the window so you or I can step on it?

MT -- that's who!

And opens the car door and wipes her hand on the ground because her hand is sticky?

Sounds like somebody did not want to touch anything inside that vehicle including her own DNA from either the gum or wiping her sticky fingers.

Nasty, vile, woman.

MOO

Are you kidding me?! I know you aren’t. AGAIN, in every way large and small, MT shows that the only person who matters to her is HER! How rude! MOO.
 
  • #465
I found it interesting when her attorney opined as how Jennifer was not the proper custodian of her children (from divorce records?) that MT's mother vigorously shook her head in agreement.
OMG.
MOO.

I need new words and acronyms to express my outrage and disgust and disbelief! The gall! I cannot believe what I am reading. Or worse, I can—. MOO.
 
  • #466
@davealtimari

Before hearing started Richard Colangelo quietly filed new charges against Michelle Troconis, adding conspiracy to commit hindering prosecution and tampering evidence charges. The tampering charge for going with Fotis Dulos to car wash to detail the red pickup truck.

Oh, yes—! Thank heavens Colangelo is staying on this! Made my day! MOO.
 
  • #467
Following the good link SDS71 posted on the actual trial there is a 13-15 minute video of the press conference. Schoenhorn is telling the press he is fighting to get the real information to them, etc. He also states that Attorney Colangelo is hiding discovery and the custody report is important to MT's case. Still smh...
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Oh, uh huh. Here we go. Is this the same person who had to be helped with a legal term today? Throwing anything and everything at the walls—what does custody have to do with conspiracy to commit murder and the murder of JFD? MOO.
 
  • #468
During the hearing Attorney S. said he would keep the custodial evaluation "secret." Then in the press conference all the T-women nodded their heads when AS said he wanted to know what it said about JFD and MT.

I guess AS's word about "secrets" means sharing only with friends, clients, and the media.

Edited to add MT to AS's curiosity.

Is this third grade or second? Pretty much, don’t we know what has been said on that? The judge said to keep MT away from the kids but did FD and MT do that? I recall no. Does anyone think JFD would say how nice it was of MT to do all she had done—on JFD’s money? Does anyone think MT would say a good word about JD even though everyone who is not related to FD or MT has and does say good things about JD? Of course not. JFD outclassed MT in every way without even trying. All JFD wanted was to do all she could for her children. She didn’t want someone else’s husband, house, money—and life. MOO.
 
  • #469
lol....Forgot for a moment about Mama T's "career as a psychologist."

All of her information would have been third hand from MT who heard it from FD or second hand from FD. I'm sure that JFD did not sit for an evaluation with Mama T.

And, the sad, sad reality is not one of those women has an inkling about the life of JFD or the day-to-day life of those children....something that will never exist again. It's sinking in....:(

I don’t think she was a psychologist. I think she was a therapist or counselor. I am NOT saying that people in those roles aren’t skilled at what they do. I’m just noting that there are some titles in the realm that require little training—and some people do take advantage of that, which, again, does not mean that there aren’t very skilled and talented people with those titles. If she were a psychologist in the U.S., MT’s mother would have lost her license over her legal issues. Regardless, it’s inane and insane. Over and over, we’ve heard from all kinds of people what a devoted mother JFD was; anyone hear that about MT or her mother—except from themselves? MOO. Absurd.
 
  • #470
@Jmoose -- It has absolutely no relevance except to a slimy lawyer and his client that really do not want for FD or MT to be seen as and believed the murderers of JD.

This defense wants to make JD out to be an unstable, hysterical, "gone-girl" mentality that most likely went off to secret location and killed herself.

Why? Well, because she did not care about her kids!
Why? Because FD was probably going to get full custody of the children after the court digested her negative her evaluation!

This is evaluation is the secret report that JS is referring to.

As I stated earlier, this evaluation of JD was in-fact disregarded by the court, and evidence of the report and testimony of its author was sealed.

JS is really reaching for the stars when he said that the evaluator interviewed MT and she should be able to view how her comments were used.

It's all bogus but ammo for reasonable doubt.

Bottom line: If the defense can sell there was no murder of JD by FD (or other because JD probably killed herself), how can MT be guilty of the charges leveled against her. No murder means no conspiracy to commit murder....


MOO

Thank you, seattle1. I am very grateful to you and everyone else here who shares their expertise to help us understand. THANK YOU. I feel better.
 
  • #471
Wow -- I thought it was a great day in court! :)

MT got nothing, and JS knocked down a peg, finally.

And for anybody concerned about the court lifting the intensive probation supervision or "IPS," don't be.

JS was too ignorant to understand (until the last 3 minutes of the hearing) that lifting IPS is not the equivalent of no curfew or house arrest. Every provision of house arrest applies including GPS monitoring.

Lifting IPS does not mean MT is free to come and go as she pleases without monitoring but it took JS asking the court about changing her curfew before he realized he got nothing!! MT's curfew applies to house arrest, not IPS.

And I think the best part of today's hearing was when Judge B stated that he talked to somebody knowledgeable about how IPS had to adapt to the state COVID19 restrictions which meant MT was not having to meet with her PO weekly and how she was actually relieved and not inconvenienced since March.

Essentially, Judge B lifted a probation requirement for a couple of weeks (until his ruling) that really wasn't impacting MT one way or the other!

I don't see Judge B doing away with house arrest which mandates GPS and I don't think he believes MT has strong ties to the community.

MOO

I feel much better! Thank you so much for explaining this, Seattle1! I’m only now catching up and it’s clear that I missed a LOT today when I thought it was just a quick decision! Big relief! MOO.
 
  • #472
"There is nothing keeping her here but this case." RC

That says it all—and for the sake of the person who is not here as a result of the murder and conspiracy—JFD—, MT needs to stay right here to face justice. MOO.
 
  • #473
Baaad, bad JS. It's not a good idea to misrepresent what RC said because of what you did.

True, the law allows media to have access to the attachments such as the videos that JS took it upon himself to release by email. However, the law requires the court to give access to (or deny) what JS filed, and does not provide for JS to act like he's both the defendant's attorney and the court.

He's shameless to try and garner Media support using a situation that's clearly advantageous to the media.

I have to keep reminding myself that JS first career was in media, and not law.

MOO

It was? I didn’t know or remember that. Well, that makes sense. MOO.
 
  • #474
Based on her mother's reaction? They think JD wasn't fit to be a mother.
Imagine that.
Just take a few moments to let that sink in.
MOO.

Gosh, and MT and her mom have shown such stellar judgment, what with all their legal problems for a start. MOO.
 
  • #475
That was a chuckle moment. Attorney S couldn't find the words or didn't want to directly state what he was hinting at, so Judge Blawie said, You mean a Frank's hearing?"

I swear the pandemic has impeded my ability to verbally express myself, and I certainly have had stellar typing and editing errors, but IMO Attorney S. has big ideas about somethings, but doesn't know the legal terminology. Is that a bit odd?

When Judge Blawie asked him about a jurisdictional hearing or a change of venue, Schoenhorn's response went all over the place. Then he said something about needing to finish the memorandum about the nonfinancial bail requirements for this hearing and the judge's clerk gave him a deadline, so he couldn't finish the memorandum about the venue/jurisdictional problems. I don't think he ever stated clearly until Judge Blawie asked him if he wanted to cover that motion at the next hearing.

I was surprised that when Schoenhorn was complaining that MT couldn't meet in daughter in NY recently (?) and Attorney Colangelo asked the direct question "When was this?" Schoenhorn ignored and prattled on about probation, etc. Neither the judge or Attorney C. required him to answer that question. I really wanted to know what the answer was.

Considering the importance of this hearing, Schoenhorn's preparation and presentation did not seem very professional to me. JUST MOO...IMOO

It reminds me of how MT and her family were all smiling and laughing in court—related to the murder of a mother of five kids—like they were on a lunch outing. It’s like they think this is no big deal, and that is so disrespectful. That conference reminded me of a carnival sideshow with a circus barker, backup ringers, and embarrassing attempts at figurative sleights of hand. MOO.
 
  • #476
OK, I need some help here.

Please tell me I'm not the only one that believes we saw a video of MT pushing the FedEx envelope through a street grate to the storm drain? TIA

ETA: And where is @afitzy when you need her!

I believe it was FD on video doing that as in this document, which is a great refresher, but I think MT is in the vehicle—on the same night of trash-bag disposal? MOO.

https://www.wtnh.com/wp-content/upl...TROCONIS-Arrest-Warrant-Executed-01-07-20.pdf
 
  • #477
  • #478
  • #479
@Jmoose -- It has absolutely no relevance except to a slimy lawyer and his client that really do not want for FD or MT to be seen as and believed the murderers of JD.

This defense wants to make JD out to be an unstable, hysterical, "gone-girl" mentality that most likely went off to secret location and killed herself.

Why? Well, because she did not care about her kids!
Why? Because FD was probably going to get full custody of the children after the court digested her negative her evaluation!

This is evaluation is the secret report that JS is referring to.

As I stated earlier, this evaluation of JD was in-fact disregarded by the court, and evidence of the report and testimony of its author was sealed.

JS is really reaching for the stars when he said that the evaluator interviewed MT and she should be able to view how her comments were used.

It's all bogus but ammo for reasonable doubt.

Bottom line: If the defense can sell there was no murder of JD by FD (or other because JD probably killed herself), how can MT be guilty of the charges leveled against her. No murder means no conspiracy to commit murder....


MOO
I have just 3 words-
Dog Bite Attorney.
 
  • #480
I found it interesting when her attorney opined as how Jennifer was not the proper custodian of her children (from divorce records?) that MT's mother vigorously shook her head in agreement.
OMG.
MOO.



images


JMHO YMMV LRR LRR LRR
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
110
Guests online
2,338
Total visitors
2,448

Forum statistics

Threads
632,764
Messages
18,631,446
Members
243,291
Latest member
lhudson
Back
Top