Still Missing CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #57

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #221
Yes, the police interviews—I agree, will likely be part of the clincher.

I also wonder about DNA on (and in!) the two ponchos recovered from Hartford. Edit: AA only specifies JfD match. Hmmm. Edit 2: AA does indicate MT match on bag openings and bags taped together, though. AAs often leave out key info that comes to light during trial, amirite?

Michelle Troconis Arrest Affadavit

Combined with possible surprises from the witness stand.
Yes and I recall an investigator said during an interview when they were at the garbage facility that it was worth their time but we never learned what they found so that will be a nice surprise too!
 
  • #222
Yes and I recall an investigator said during an interview when they were at the garbage facility that it was worth their time but we never learned what they found so that will be a nice surprise too!
 
  • #223
Agreed and she brought a vacuum and cleaned windows… I highly doubt it. I wonder if they have evidence of paper towels with window cleaner on them as she claims she was doing upstairs!
And the contents of the vacuum cleaner.
 
  • #224
A week from today, Michelle’s trial starts…if she somehow gets acquitted, or ends up facing no time in prison, I think I will lose my mind. I mean, I don’t see how it could actually happen, but it does happen. I feel like I have got to see her get rightfully convicted-at the very least, for the tampering and hindering prosecution charges. How much time in prison could she serve on those two charges, if she ends up getting acquitted on the conspiracy charge-does anyone know?
 
  • #225
My neighbor just shared this information with me (the statue's for conspiracy and tampering and hindering prosecution):

Connecticut General Statues 53a-166

A person is guilty of hindering prosecution in the second degree when such person renders criminal assistance to another person who has committed a class A or class B felony or an unclassified felony for which the maximum penalty is imprisonment for more than ten years.

Connecticut General Statutes § 53a-155- tampering with evidence is a class D felony punishable upon conviction by up to five years in jail.
 
  • #226
...and the Class B Felony (Conspiracy to Commit Murder) is up to 20 years imprisonment. The statute is 53a-54a.
 
  • #227
My neighbor just shared this information with me (the statue's for conspiracy and tampering and hindering prosecution):

Connecticut General Statues 53a-166

A person is guilty of hindering prosecution in the second degree when such person renders criminal assistance to another person who has committed a class A or class B felony or an unclassified felony for which the maximum penalty is imprisonment for more than ten years.

Connecticut General Statutes § 53a-155- tampering with evidence is a class D felony punishable upon conviction by up to five years in jail.
Ahhh-thank you. Would it be too much to ask that they sentence her to consecutive terms, and not concurrent ones, if she is convicted of these two (and seriously, I am praying for a conviction on the conspiracy charge, too, but know they can prove she tampered and hindered)?
 
  • #228
First, this case was prosecuted in Federal Court but it was especially satisfying to hear the federal judge use his discretion wisely to sentence the girlfriend in this murder to years her attorney deemed excessive.

Judge Martínez did not miss a thing including the defendant's demeanor in Court.

He added that Milliron seemed "unrepentant," in part because he judged her emotionally unmoved when she was shown graphic images and listened to wrenching testimony during the trial.

There's always hope @Jmoose!


Girlfriend of wealthy dentist Lawrence Rudolph, who killed his wife on a safari, gets 17 year prison term

8/22/23

[..]

[Lori] Milliron was convicted last year of perjury, being an accessory to a murder after the fact and obstructing a grand jury in a case that's garnered national attention. She was charged alongside Lawrence "Larry" Rudolph, a U.S. dentist who was convicted last year of fatally shooting his wife while on a 2016 hunting trip in Zambia.

[..]

Rudolph ran a multimillion-dollar dental empire in Pittsburgh. He and Bianca Rudolph were both skilled big game hunters. Milliron was his office manager.

John Dill, an attorney for Milliron, said the prison sentence was longer than what is typically dolled out for such charges, calling it "excessive" and vowing to appeal. Dill argued that the convictions were merely based on Milliron's perjury charges and do not implicate her in the execution of the crime.

[..]

Judge William J. Martínez argued that the long sentence was deserved because evidence pointed to Milliron "encouraging" the crime.
 
  • #229
I can’t wait until January 8th as it’ll be so interesting to hear MT’s defense, innocence???

I am quite interested in hearing her explanation of how she was conveniently there every step of the way before and after but allegedly had no clue. How does one not return police calls (they called her multiple times), if she is innocent, why didn’t she return their calls? She knew Jennifer and her children, wouldn’t she want to help in any way possible? Her social media and her family claims she is so religious and caring. Seems so unlike her to not want to help. If she is innocent, why did she write phony information on a prepared, hand written timeline in perfect English when she claims she doesn’t understand English? If innocent, why would she retort the same lies to police repeatedly and then subsequently change stories on several occasions when confronted with the truth? If she was innocent, then wouldn’t she have told the truth the first time?

I am also interested in finding out why she drove back-and-forth several times to and from a spec house bringing cleaning supplies, seeing FD clean car seats of a borrowed truck, then take part in a key shuffle that appears she was quite involved in. So strange that she didn’t find any of these activities suspicious enough to call the police? If innocent with nothing to hide then why try to file motion after motion to obstruct evidence, most notably not wanting her phone data in the trial? Wouldn’t she want the jury to see total transparency if nothing to hide?

FD’s cloud data from his phone and computers will be revealing I think and I am anxious to see the texts exchanged with her that they thought were deleted but recovered by analytics, I am hoping. Also, KM’s phone data, too!

Why would she drive with FD all the way to Hartford to dump trash in several receptacles since there was a large dumpster for them to use at the spec house yet claims she had no idea. Why did she not find it concerning that he stuffed a FedEx box in a storm drain or propped a Weathertech mat from a Suburban up again a restaurant, Milagros’wall. How do you explain the car mat as that is not something you could justify disposing of from a spec house. Talking on the phone to your friend is not enough of a defense in my opinion. It is astounding to think that she may think that anyone would buy that she is that clueless! Why multiple stops? Did she not find that suspicious in the least? Did she not find it odd that FD was wearing gloves as you can see in the footage?

Then she followed him in a separate car to get PG’s truck detailed etc. watched while he withdrew cash to pay for it. That was obviously planned. Was that not suspicious either? Cash? Not wanting a record for a business expense? Not using the company cc that was used for all of his other expenses!


MT had ample opportunities to tell the truth after FD committed suicide so she, in my option, cannot claim she was afraid. There luckily was another person involved that I hope will shed a little light on her involvement and I’m confident KM’s testimony will be worth the wait. Since he’s an attorney, I’m hoping he kept some damning evidence in the event he needed it.
 
  • #230
I can’t wait until January 8th as it’ll be so interesting to hear MT’s defense, innocence???

I am quite interested in hearing her explanation of how she was conveniently there every step of the way before and after but allegedly had no clue. How does one not return police calls (they called her multiple times), if she is innocent, why didn’t she return their calls? She knew Jennifer and her children, wouldn’t she want to help in any way possible? Her social media and her family claims she is so religious and caring. Seems so unlike her to not want to help. If she is innocent, why did she write phony information on a prepared, hand written timeline in perfect English when she claims she doesn’t understand English? If innocent, why would she retort the same lies to police repeatedly and then subsequently change stories on several occasions when confronted with the truth? If she was innocent, then wouldn’t she have told the truth the first time?

I am also interested in finding out why she drove back-and-forth several times to and from a spec house bringing cleaning supplies, seeing FD clean car seats of a borrowed truck, then take part in a key shuffle that appears she was quite involved in. So strange that she didn’t find any of these activities suspicious enough to call the police? If innocent with nothing to hide then why try to file motion after motion to obstruct evidence, most notably not wanting her phone data in the trial? Wouldn’t she want the jury to see total transparency if nothing to hide?

FD’s cloud data from his phone and computers will be revealing I think and I am anxious to see the texts exchanged with her that they thought were deleted but recovered by analytics, I am hoping. Also, KM’s phone data, too!

Why would she drive with FD all the way to Hartford to dump trash in several receptacles since there was a large dumpster for them to use at the spec house yet claims she had no idea. Why did she not find it concerning that he stuffed a FedEx box in a storm drain or propped a Weathertech mat from a Suburban up again a restaurant, Milagros’wall. How do you explain the car mat as that is not something you could justify disposing of from a spec house. Talking on the phone to your friend is not enough of a defense in my opinion. It is astounding to think that she may think that anyone would buy that she is that clueless! Why multiple stops? Did she not find that suspicious in the least? Did she not find it odd that FD was wearing gloves as you can see in the footage?

Then she followed him in a separate car to get PG’s truck detailed etc. watched while he withdrew cash to pay for it. That was obviously planned. Was that not suspicious either? Cash? Not wanting a record for a business expense? Not using the company cc that was used for all of his other expenses!


MT had ample opportunities to tell the truth after FD committed suicide so she, in my option, cannot claim she was afraid. There luckily was another person involved that I hope will shed a little light on her involvement and I’m confident KM’s testimony will be worth the wait. Since he’s an attorney, I’m hoping he kept some damning evidence in the event he needed it.
Another thing…if she was totally innocent, why didn’t she move herself and her kid out of that house the minute she was told Jennifer was “missing”? She knew how much fD hated her, and by MT’s own words, hoped that JFD would “just disappear”. It never occurred to this woman who was so smart, she was an entrepreneur since childhood, that he’d done it, and put her in the hot seat?
 
  • #231
Or fear for her own life & her daughter’s life. I’d be terrified of him! Nor did her mother demand that she leave immediately & protect her granddaughters life.
 
  • #232
Or fear for her own life & her daughter’s life. I’d be terrified of him! Nor did her mother demand that she leave immediately & protect her granddaughters life.
YES?!?! a thousand times! That’s a very disturbing part of this case, to me. That’s why LA (JFD’s nanny) is a freaking heroine for scooting the precious D children to GF’s!

Unless of similar shady slippery ilk, IMO. “Ilk” a fav word, lol. I believe MT thought she was special, not subject to fD’s wrath. And that somehow, they had outsmarted LE. Deluded, predatory… and came by it honestly(?!)

Middle age has opened my eyes even more to the capacity for denial & circling wagons among “families.” I come from a clannish culture and have seen it firsthand.

MOO
 
  • #233
I can’t wait until January 8th as it’ll be so interesting to hear MT’s defense, innocence???

I am quite interested in hearing her explanation of how she was conveniently there every step of the way before and after but allegedly had no clue. How does one not return police calls (they called her multiple times), if she is innocent, why didn’t she return their calls? She knew Jennifer and her children, wouldn’t she want to help in any way possible? Her social media and her family claims she is so religious and caring. Seems so unlike her to not want to help. If she is innocent, why did she write phony information on a prepared, hand written timeline in perfect English when she claims she doesn’t understand English? If innocent, why would she retort the same lies to police repeatedly and then subsequently change stories on several occasions when confronted with the truth? If she was innocent, then wouldn’t she have told the truth the first time?

I am also interested in finding out why she drove back-and-forth several times to and from a spec house bringing cleaning supplies, seeing FD clean car seats of a borrowed truck, then take part in a key shuffle that appears she was quite involved in. So strange that she didn’t find any of these activities suspicious enough to call the police? If innocent with nothing to hide then why try to file motion after motion to obstruct evidence, most notably not wanting her phone data in the trial? Wouldn’t she want the jury to see total transparency if nothing to hide?

FD’s cloud data from his phone and computers will be revealing I think and I am anxious to see the texts exchanged with her that they thought were deleted but recovered by analytics, I am hoping. Also, KM’s phone data, too!

Why would she drive with FD all the way to Hartford to dump trash in several receptacles since there was a large dumpster for them to use at the spec house yet claims she had no idea. Why did she not find it concerning that he stuffed a FedEx box in a storm drain or propped a Weathertech mat from a Suburban up again a restaurant, Milagros’wall. How do you explain the car mat as that is not something you could justify disposing of from a spec house. Talking on the phone to your friend is not enough of a defense in my opinion. It is astounding to think that she may think that anyone would buy that she is that clueless! Why multiple stops? Did she not find that suspicious in the least? Did she not find it odd that FD was wearing gloves as you can see in the footage?

Then she followed him in a separate car to get PG’s truck detailed etc. watched while he withdrew cash to pay for it. That was obviously planned. Was that not suspicious either? Cash? Not wanting a record for a business expense? Not using the company cc that was used for all of his other expenses!


MT had ample opportunities to tell the truth after FD committed suicide so she, in my option, cannot claim she was afraid. There luckily was another person involved that I hope will shed a little light on her involvement and I’m confident KM’s testimony will be worth the wait. Since he’s an attorney, I’m hoping he kept some damning evidence in the event he needed it.
All good points, but do we have it on anyone other than MT’s word that she was truly driving back and forth from 4JC to the spec house at 80 MS Rd with cleaning supplies in those critical hours after JFD was killed?

i ask because, IMO, MT cannot verify with independent evidence her claims about her whereabouts during the hours from 11 am (when she visited her friend Petu to say goodbye, assuming LE verified that claim) and when she was seen on surveillance at 1:36 pm driving the white Jeep into the driveway at 80 MS Rd followed by FD driving his black Suburban. They arrive in tandem, suggesting they are traveling together from somewhere, and LE does not say their direction of travel as they arrive at 80 MS Rd in the Arrest Affidavit (although LE does specify direction of travel most other times). So, are they arriving from the direction of 4JC or from another direction? Is FD in his black Suburban arriving from 4JC, or is it arriving from New Canaan with some intermediate stop between? And, did MT meet with him at such an intermediate stop? (Instead of “going to the waterski pond but no one was there to pull me” at 11:30, and “at home” from noon to 3 pm, and “lunch with Fotis” from noon to 1 pm as the activity page of the alibi script claims…she didn't have herself taking anything to 80 MS Rd until 3:30 on that log…likely unaware that surveillance put her there nearly two hours earlier, at 1:36 pm.)

That last bag of evidence dumped at Albany Ave/Green St contained multiple items described in the AA (JFD’s t-shirt worn her last day, her bra, multiple torn open bags that had been taped - including two that had been taped together, two rain ponchos, cut zip ties, and various other items with JFD blood and DNA, FD DNA, and MT DNA). One intact garbage bag contains various other no longer intact garbage bags and some of the clothing and the zip ties that bound JFD’s body.

What story does that tell? Think about it. The taped together bag containing JFD was opened, the zip ties binding her were cut, and at least some of JFD’s clothes were separated from her body and all those things were then put into a new bag - without JFD’s body (which to date has not been found). And MT was there when the unwrapping was done.

Where was MT from 11 am until 1:36 pm? Because I don’t believe her own uncorroborated claims.
 
  • #234
I can’t wait until January 8th as it’ll be so interesting to hear MT’s defense, innocence???

I am quite interested in hearing her explanation of how she was conveniently there every step of the way before and after but allegedly had no clue. How does one not return police calls (they called her multiple times), if she is innocent, why didn’t she return their calls? She knew Jennifer and her children, wouldn’t she want to help in any way possible? Her social media and her family claims she is so religious and caring. Seems so unlike her to not want to help. If she is innocent, why did she write phony information on a prepared, hand written timeline in perfect English when she claims she doesn’t understand English? If innocent, why would she retort the same lies to police repeatedly and then subsequently change stories on several occasions when confronted with the truth? If she was innocent, then wouldn’t she have told the truth the first time?

I am also interested in finding out why she drove back-and-forth several times to and from a spec house bringing cleaning supplies, seeing FD clean car seats of a borrowed truck, then take part in a key shuffle that appears she was quite involved in. So strange that she didn’t find any of these activities suspicious enough to call the police? If innocent with nothing to hide then why try to file motion after motion to obstruct evidence, most notably not wanting her phone data in the trial? Wouldn’t she want the jury to see total transparency if nothing to hide?

FD’s cloud data from his phone and computers will be revealing I think and I am anxious to see the texts exchanged with her that they thought were deleted but recovered by analytics, I am hoping. Also, KM’s phone data, too!

Why would she drive with FD all the way to Hartford to dump trash in several receptacles since there was a large dumpster for them to use at the spec house yet claims she had no idea. Why did she not find it concerning that he stuffed a FedEx box in a storm drain or propped a Weathertech mat from a Suburban up again a restaurant, Milagros’wall. How do you explain the car mat as that is not something you could justify disposing of from a spec house. Talking on the phone to your friend is not enough of a defense in my opinion. It is astounding to think that she may think that anyone would buy that she is that clueless! Why multiple stops? Did she not find that suspicious in the least? Did she not find it odd that FD was wearing gloves as you can see in the footage? Will she say she didn’t notice

Then she followed him in a separate car to get PG’s truck detailed etc. watched while he withdrew cash to pay for it. That was obviously planned. Was that not suspicious either? Cash? Not wanting a record for a business expense? Not using the company cc that was used for all of his other expenses!


MT had ample opportunities to tell the truth after FD committed suicide so she, in my option, cannot claim she was afraid. There luckily was another person involved that I hope will shed a little light on her involvement and I’m confident KM’s testimony will be worth the wait. Since he’s an attorney, I’m hoping he kept some damning evidence in the event he needed it.
All good points, but do we have it on anyone other than MT’s word that she was truly driving back and forth from 4JC to the spec house at 80 MS Rd with cleaning supplies in those critical hours after JFD was killed?

i ask because, IMO, MT cannot verify with independent evidence her claims about her whereabouts during the hours from 11 am (when she visited her friend Petu to say goodbye, assuming LE verified that claim) and when she was seen on surveillance at 1:36 pm driving the white Jeep into the driveway at 80 MS Rd followed by FD driving his black Suburban. They arrive in tandem, suggesting they are traveling together from somewhere, and LE does not say their direction of travel as they arrive at 80 MS Rd in the Arrest Affidavit (although LE does specify direction of travel most other times). So, are they arriving from the direction of 4JC or from another direction? Is FD in his black Suburban arriving from 4JC, or is it arriving from New Canaan with some intermediate stop between? And, did MT meet with him at such an intermediate stop? (Instead of “going to the waterski pond but no one was there to pull me” at 11:30, and “at home” from noon to 3 pm, and “lunch with Fotis” from noon to 1 pm as the activity page of the alibi script claims…she didn't have herself taking anything to 80 MS Rd until 3:30 on that log…likely unaware that surveillance put her there nearly two hours earlier, at 1:36 pm.)

That last bag of evidence dumped at Albany Ave/Green St contained multiple items described in the AA (JFD’s t-shirt worn her last day, her bra, multiple torn open bags that had been taped - including two that had been taped together, two rain ponchos, cut zip ties, and various other items with JFD blood and DNA, FD DNA, and MT DNA). One intact garbage bag contains various other no longer intact garbage bags and some of the clothing and the zip ties that bound JFD’s body.

What story does that tell? Think about it. The taped together bag containing JFD was opened, the zip ties binding her were cut, and at least some of JFD’s clothes were separated from her body and all those things were then put into a new bag - without JFD’s body (which to date has not been found). And MT was there when the unwrapping was done.

Where was MT from 11 am until 1:36 pm? Because I don’t believe her own uncorroborated claims.
Love the details here! The only thing I can think of is the neighbor’s camera which captured FD getting the mail could also have captured her trips or lack of trips to and from JC to MS.
 
  • #235
All good points, but do we have it on anyone other than MT’s word that she was truly driving back and forth from 4JC to the spec house at 80 MS Rd with cleaning supplies in those critical hours after JFD was killed?

i ask because, IMO, MT cannot verify with independent evidence her claims about her whereabouts during the hours from 11 am (when she visited her friend Petu to say goodbye, assuming LE verified that claim) and when she was seen on surveillance at 1:36 pm driving the white Jeep into the driveway at 80 MS Rd followed by FD driving his black Suburban. They arrive in tandem, suggesting they are traveling together from somewhere, and LE does not say their direction of travel as they arrive at 80 MS Rd in the Arrest Affidavit (although LE does specify direction of travel most other times). So, are they arriving from the direction of 4JC or from another direction? Is FD in his black Suburban arriving from 4JC, or is it arriving from New Canaan with some intermediate stop between? And, did MT meet with him at such an intermediate stop? (Instead of “going to the waterski pond but no one was there to pull me” at 11:30, and “at home” from noon to 3 pm, and “lunch with Fotis” from noon to 1 pm as the activity page of the alibi script claims…she didn't have herself taking anything to 80 MS Rd until 3:30 on that log…likely unaware that surveillance put her there nearly two hours earlier, at 1:36 pm.)

That last bag of evidence dumped at Albany Ave/Green St contained multiple items described in the AA (JFD’s t-shirt worn her last day, her bra, multiple torn open bags that had been taped - including two that had been taped together, two rain ponchos, cut zip ties, and various other items with JFD blood and DNA, FD DNA, and MT DNA). One intact garbage bag contains various other no longer intact garbage bags and some of the clothing and the zip ties that bound JFD’s body.

What story does that tell? Think about it. The taped together bag containing JFD was opened, the zip ties binding her were cut, and at least some of JFD’s clothes were separated from her body and all those things were then put into a new bag - without JFD’s body (which to date has not been found). And MT was there when the unwrapping was done.

Where was MT from 11 am until 1:36 pm? Because I don’t believe her own uncorroborated claims.
Why was she saying “goodbye” to Petu? Was one of them going somewhere?
 
  • #236
All good points, but do we have it on anyone other than MT’s word that she was truly driving back and forth from 4JC to the spec house at 80 MS Rd with cleaning supplies in those critical hours after JFD was killed?

i ask because, IMO, MT cannot verify with independent evidence her claims about her whereabouts during the hours from 11 am (when she visited her friend Petu to say goodbye, assuming LE verified that claim) and when she was seen on surveillance at 1:36 pm driving the white Jeep into the driveway at 80 MS Rd followed by FD driving his black Suburban. They arrive in tandem, suggesting they are traveling together from somewhere, and LE does not say their direction of travel as they arrive at 80 MS Rd in the Arrest Affidavit (although LE does specify direction of travel most other times). So, are they arriving from the direction of 4JC or from another direction? Is FD in his black Suburban arriving from 4JC, or is it arriving from New Canaan with some intermediate stop between? And, did MT meet with him at such an intermediate stop? (Instead of “going to the waterski pond but no one was there to pull me” at 11:30, and “at home” from noon to 3 pm, and “lunch with Fotis” from noon to 1 pm as the activity page of the alibi script claims…she didn't have herself taking anything to 80 MS Rd until 3:30 on that log…likely unaware that surveillance put her there nearly two hours earlier, at 1:36 pm.)

That last bag of evidence dumped at Albany Ave/Green St contained multiple items described in the AA (JFD’s t-shirt worn her last day, her bra, multiple torn open bags that had been taped - including two that had been taped together, two rain ponchos, cut zip ties, and various other items with JFD blood and DNA, FD DNA, and MT DNA). One intact garbage bag contains various other no longer intact garbage bags and some of the clothing and the zip ties that bound JFD’s body.

What story does that tell? Think about it. The taped together bag containing JFD was opened, the zip ties binding her were cut, and at least some of JFD’s clothes were separated from her body and all those things were then put into a new bag - without JFD’s body (which to date has not been found). And MT was there when the unwrapping was done.

Where was MT from 11 am until 1:36 pm? Because I don’t believe her own uncorroborated claims.
Remember when Erin Moriarty (48 Hours) was sharing details that she received from Troconis’s lawyer, as if they were facts? For example, ”Michelle didn’t even know on the night they were tossing out garbage bags in other people’s receptacles, that Jennifer was missing.” I'm sure all of this nonsense will surface when the defense eventually has their turn. Ugh.
 
  • #237
Remember when Erin Moriarty (48 Hours) was sharing details that she received from Troconis’s lawyer, as if they were facts? For example, ”Michelle didn’t even know on the night they were tossing out garbage bags in other people’s receptacles, that Jennifer was missing.” I'm sure all of this nonsense will surface when the defense eventually has their turn. Ugh.
I remember that-she knows better, too. There was more than one thing that she claimed as fact, because she got it from JS. This appeared to be very unprofessional, in my opinion. I would go so far as to say that I think EM and JS are friends. The only excuse I could possibly come up with for this, is that JS and MT’s family are the only ones willing to blab with her for that 48hrs episode.
 
  • #238
Why was she saying “goodbye” to Petu? Was one of them going somewhere?
I am not aware of anything other than that was MT's claim, but I'd be willing to bet LE asked questions to get to an answer (honest or not).
 
  • #239
Remember when Erin Moriarty (48 Hours) was sharing details that she received from Troconis’s lawyer, as if they were facts? For example, ”Michelle didn’t even know on the night they were tossing out garbage bags in other people’s receptacles, that Jennifer was missing.” I'm sure all of this nonsense will surface when the defense eventually has their turn. Ugh.
At some point, the ignorance act doesn't fly and those you are trying to fool with it just conclude that you are insulting their intelligence.

MT's an educated, multilingual, "accomplished entrepreneur CEO" who has traveled the world and worked successfully with professionals in various countries, but she's too stupid to know and did not participate when FD is driving from street to street, dumping full garbage bags into assorted bins, stowing a FedEx envelope in a storm drain, and propping a cargo liner against a restaurant's exterior wall - all on the night JFD has disappeared and LE is attempting contact?

And then there is that quick glance shared between FD and MT when their friend announced at the BBQ that there is breaking news that LE is on Albany Ave taking garbage bags out of bins and that is in some way associated with JFD's disappearance. Why would FD share a glance with MT at that moment?
 
Last edited:
  • #240
I am not aware of anything other than that was MT's claim, but I'd be willing to bet LE asked questions to get to an answer (honest or not).
Of course, you know where I was going with that question…I am convinced fD, MT, and 6 children were planning to leave the country after Jennifer’s murder.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
143
Guests online
3,335
Total visitors
3,478

Forum statistics

Threads
632,630
Messages
18,629,378
Members
243,227
Latest member
PghinAZ
Back
Top