I forgot about Riccio. I wonder if he withdrew because fD was unmanageble as a client?For his first court appearance, AIR, FD was represented by Atty Eugene Riccio, who later withdrew from the case.
I forgot about Riccio. I wonder if he withdrew because fD was unmanageble as a client?For his first court appearance, AIR, FD was represented by Atty Eugene Riccio, who later withdrew from the case.
I believe Eugene Riccio was only hired to represent him in terms of bond. Then Norm was hired as his actual criminal attorney.I forgot about Riccio. I wonder if he withdrew because fD was unmanageble as a client?
Guillaume Vidalette (remember him?) was the alleged owner, who transferred the title to the current owner, in 2018.Remember, she did honor the advice of Bowman during the Farber vs Fore deposition and take the 5th all every single question. Did anyone ever confirm if she was on the deed for the 123 Hunter Drive, West Hartford property? She was clearly involved in hiding assets for the Fore Group, but not sure if this will come up on the criminal case. Maybe? Just enough to establish her crafty and nefarious capabilities and not necessarily under the Fotis Dulos Spell, either.
iirc, Pyetranker was one of the attorneys involved in the divorce/child custody fiasco?
Wonder if KW was that always-available-defense-attorney?
But fD was smart enough to know they were too enmeshed for court representation?
(Kent, we're here counting on you -- sing like a canary, Kent, sing!)
jmho ymmv lrr
Yeah, this sounds right.We also can't forget that fD was drowning in debt and cash poor at this time. His charming manipulation didn't work so great with those at the top of their game in the legal community. IMO, NP covered his costs but didn't take fD's case for profit but for the publicity that came with the high profile case.
NP was also representing Alex Jones at the time, so I'm sure his healthy retainer was sufficient to balance FD's minimal resources (yet maximum exposure).Yeah, this sounds right.
Hear, Hear! The end...“…She had the assistance of competent counsel before and during the interviews. Though police used, at times, deceptive tactics her will was not overborne.”
That’s never going to happen. And after she is convicted, she will continue to whine about the unfairness of it all, and defame Jennifer.Now, can WE make a motion to suppress her obnoxious social media?
That’s never going to happen. And after she is convicted, she will continue to whine about the unfairness of it all, and defame Jennifer.
KW? Did you mean KM?iirc, Pyetranker was one of the attorneys involved in the divorce/child custody fiasco?
Wonder if KW was that always-available-defense-attorney?
But fD was smart enough to know they were too enmeshed for court representation?
(Kent, we're here counting on you -- sing like a canary, Kent, sing!)
jmho ymmv lrr