Still Missing CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #59

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #261
I wonder why MT is sitting between the attorneys this morning instead of to the side like she has been.
Either they are trying to hide her actions/reactions or trying to keep a better eye on her to stop her from doing stoopid shyt. Just my guess!
 
  • #262
JS being JS (making himself look ridiculous)
 
  • #263
Witness was the Evidence Officer for the whole case. Processing the Jeep for evidence related to the missing person case.

So far no objections from JS as batches of photos are offered.

Until now. JS objects, wants to know if anything was seized? State objects. Judge disallows JS's question but allows him to continue voir dire.

JS as about who took the photos, etc. Objects to relevance.

State answers. She explains how the photographs go toward process, inventory will follow.

JS objects to his objection. Just because the Fore Group owned something that had stuff in it, isn't relevant.

State argues the validity of the investigation process. Abd the relevancy of the Jeep

Judge overrules JS.
 
  • #264
The bottom keys come with Emtek and Baldwin door handles. Typically found in high end residences.
And Albany Ave. seems like an unlikely place for high end keys to end up in the trash.
 
  • #265
The White Jeep was owned by FORE but was MT PRIMARY VEHICLE. Not relevant? It is highly relevant. So glad the State stayed the course and battled this ridiculous interpretation of "Relevancy" in this case.

Glad Judge cited code and explained it to the Jury so as to take this ongoing time waster and improper objection from Defence off the table for future debate. I'm waiting for the Judge to answer back, "asked and answered counsel"!

Just wanted to ask the question about the White Jeep that the AA I posted earlier listed this vehicle as having a CT license plate but we had seen prior comments about FL licence plate. Does anyone understand where the FL license plate on this vehicle first entered the discussion? I'm confused.

MOO
 
Last edited:
  • #266
Witness describes an inventory search.

State is still offering photos of the Jeep before publishing them en masse.
 
  • #267
JS just objected to a sandwich.
 
  • #268
  • #269
Were the items in rear cargo of Jeep tested by state? Confused. Looks like all those items could have been used for cleanup or disposal of victim imo.
 
  • #270
Photos admitted.

Seeing the Jeep in the Trooper garage.

Looking for anything related to the disappearance of missing person JFD.

No swabbing, nothing seized.

Photo of rear cargo

Construction tools
Paper towels

Items laid out on butcher paper

Contents of glove box contents and side compartments
 
  • #271
The White Jeep was owned by FORE but was MT PRIMARY VEHICLE. Not relevant? It is highly relevant. So glad the State stayed the course and battled this ridiculous interpretation of "Relevancy" in this case.

Glad Judge cited code and explained it to the Jury so as to take this ongoing time waster and improper objection from Defence.

MOO
(Snipped for focus) Right?!? I mean, duh! I’m having visions of MT charging up the MS driveway in that vehicle, ahead of FD.

JS: “Don’t look there.” LOOK THERE.

MOO
 
  • #272
State preparing to publish photos of the 2015 Chevy Suburban.
 
  • #273
Why wouldn’t contents of Jeep be tested? No visible blood or nothing with any evidentiary value observed?
 
  • #274
JS objecting to the photo showing Luminol. JS says Luminol has no evidentiary value and will confuse the jury.
State counters with the State Police's actions as vehicles were processed. Goes to the thoroughness of the State's investigation.
Objection, overruled.
 
  • #275
JS keeps trying to get evidence photos ruledas irrelevant - Prosecutor sticks up for the State's case saying they are proving thoroughness of the state performing same testing on all the vehicles
 
  • #276
Groan. MOO
 
  • #277
Why wouldn’t contents of Jeep be tested? No visible blood or nothing with any evidentiary value observed?
Makes no sense. That looked like a scene clean up kit to me in back of white jeep! Moo
 
  • #278
LOL @ Judge and his sports analogies! Love it.
 
  • #279
Wonder what the fixation is on the liner?
 
  • #280
JS clarifying. He isn't arguing they didn't do everything. He's arguing that their investigation was biased. JS says 99% of what is shown is irrelevant to the case.
Says it'll be confusing to the jury.
Judge refers to an exercise in divination. He cannot deternine what is relevant at this point. Upholds the process.
Overruled.

Recess until 11:35
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
112
Guests online
2,600
Total visitors
2,712

Forum statistics

Threads
632,774
Messages
18,631,637
Members
243,292
Latest member
suspicious sims
Back
Top