Witness was the Evidence Officer for the whole case. Processing the Jeep for evidence related to the missing person case.
So far no objections from JS as batches of photos are offered.
Until now. JS objects, wants to know if anything was seized? State objects. Judge disallows JS's question but allows him to continue voir dire.
JS as about who took the photos, etc. Objects to relevance.
State answers. She explains how the photographs go toward process, inventory will follow.
JS objects to his objection. Just because the Fore Group owned something that had stuff in it, isn't relevant.
State argues the validity of the investigation process. Abd the relevancy of the Jeep
Judge overrules JS.