Still Missing CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #60

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #401
One of the most fascinating revelations to me was the part of the police interrogation when police start leaving the room, and Troconis literally gets on her knees in an extremely submissive way and begs her attorney to convey to her daughter that she loves her.

As if that is the important part: Troconis is a good mother who loves her daughter, not that her daughter is loved and cared for. She could have begged to make sure she is cared for, and that she is secure in knowing her mother would be there now if she could, and her mother will be with her again. That is not the same thing as a rough variation of tell my daughter I'm a good mother, even though you have to endure my arrest right now. A much more selfish message than tell my daughter that I will make sure she getsthe love and care she needs.

But on her knees, begging and crying put the power 100% in attoney Bowman's hands to anoint her a good mother, or not. In the position she assumed, she was nearly in place to perform a submissive sex act. It seemed to annoy Bowman, who had no intention to control her sense of self worth or humiliate her. But it was one more piece of data as to what the dynamic between Troconis and Dulos likely was. I believe LE more than Troconis about that dynamic. I think she was in danger from him like LE said, not that they fought a lot and she was an equal participant as she said.

This does not mean she is not a co-conspirator to murder. Innocent until proven, of course, but I think she is likely guilty on all charges.

I also think she was in a far more abusive relationship than she realized-she probably still doesn't know it now.

MOO
 
  • #402
Here is basically the whole KM warrant. It does not give a lot of information as to how they can prove a conspiracy. There is definitely something omitted that directly ties him to what happened to Jennifer. Notice how KM is not charged with tampering, but only with conspiracy. Does that mean they don’t think he helped dispose of Jennifer? I really hope they have much more than this.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1701.jpeg
    IMG_1701.jpeg
    135.4 KB · Views: 19
  • IMG_1702.jpeg
    IMG_1702.jpeg
    139.4 KB · Views: 18
  • IMG_1703.jpeg
    IMG_1703.jpeg
    177.2 KB · Views: 17
  • IMG_1704.jpeg
    IMG_1704.jpeg
    205.8 KB · Views: 17
  • IMG_1705.jpeg
    IMG_1705.jpeg
    185.1 KB · Views: 16
  • IMG_1706.jpeg
    IMG_1706.jpeg
    210 KB · Views: 18
  • #403
Local Channel 8 recap of MT law enforcement interviews:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
I posted this interview to show what I sometimes see as “defence counsel bias”in their analysis of oftentimes horrifying cases. Its fascinating to see play out in court as many times jurors don’t share the “bias” and choose instead to not give the benefit of the doubt to defendants, particularly in horrific crimes such as what happened in the JF murder. I watched the above interview and quite simply didn’t agree with his thinking on much of anything frankly. I’m not sure exactly what creates this “bias” but perhaps it is seeing horrific crime over and over and simply becoming indifferent to the horror of what some human beings might be capable of doing? IDK but if that is the answer, it’s horrifying imo. MOO
 
  • #404
One of the most fascinating revelations to me was the part of the police interrogation when police start leaving the room, and Troconis literally gets on her knees in an extremely submissive way and begs her attorney to convey to her daughter that she loves her.

As if that is the important part: Troconis is a good mother who loves her daughter, not that her daughter is loved and cared for. She could have begged to make sure she is cared for, and that she is secure in knowing her mother would be there now if she could, and her mother will be with her again. That is not the same thing as a rough variation of tell my daughter I'm a good mother, even though you have to endure my arrest right now. A much more selfish message than tell my daughter that I will make sure she getsthe love and care she needs.

But on her knees, begging and crying put the power 100% in attoney Bowman's hands to anoint her a good mother, or not. In the position she assumed, she was nearly in place to perform a submissive sex act. It seemed to annoy Bowman, who had no intention to control her sense of self worth or humiliate her. But it was one more piece of data as to what the dynamic between Troconis and Dulos likely was. I believe LE more than Troconis about that dynamic. I think she was in danger from him like LE said, not that they fought a lot and she was an equal participant as she said.

This does not mean she is not a co-conspirator to murder. Innocent until proven, of course, but I think she is likely guilty on all charges.

I also think she was in a far more abusive relationship than she realized-she probably still doesn't know it now.

MOO
Well put and interesting theory!

The psychology of MT and the MT/FD relationship have been long discussed topics in this case for the last four years and I think we could probably go on for another 50 threads on the issues involved.

MT in the Law Enforcement interviews described herself as “dominant”’and “strong”’and even “aggressive ” with the ability to stand up for herself in a relationship with an equally dominant, strong and aggressive FD. Yet we saw her down on her knees to the one male who she thought could save her!

Based on everything I’ve seen in this case that act of MT on her knees showed precisely who she is. She is someone who with no regard for others (or her own dignity) will do whatever it takes, including degrading herself, to manipulate others to do what she wants. Kneeling down to atty bowman gave the message to him of clear submission and also sent the message to him of what else she might do for him if he helped her (her usual MO is always sex). Atty bowman was imo visually disgusted as would most people with a moral code might be! The scene is so imo Latina drama over the top that it’s best watched without sound as the words coming from MT about her love for her daughter don’t matter to her but are meant purely to attempt to manipulate atty bowman. Love is just another tool in the MT manipulation toolbox. It was stunning to watch as I think that was when MT first realized she was in a mess and couldn’t escape or run away as she usually does. I also believe atty bowman ran for the hills when he then realized who MT was and what she was wrapped up with along with FD.

How many criminals when given an opportunity for a deal then turn around and continue to lie and do so multiple times? Imo those who know there is no way to tell the truth. We seen even after 2 month time gap in the third interview where MT could have come clean, she simply wasn’t able to do it. Stunning stuff.

What I think law enforcement and certainly atty bowman didn’t understand initially is that MT has no boundaries (like FD) and also has no right and wrong in her psychological makeup as most people understand them in a traditional religious and moral sense. These are folks that will do whatever it takes, never think they do anything wrong and will see consequence's purely as unwarranted persecution. Guilt and the concept of doing the right thing are not how these people are wired. These are people that only care about themselves always.

We saw law enforcement trying to first appeal to MT as a mother to find JF or even care about her own daughter if she goes to prison and I think the males in the room were surprised when that tactic fell flat. MT imo doesn't care about her daughter other than as a tool to have a lifestyle with a wealthy baby daddy and she certainly didn’t care about the dulos children other than for the money they represented and how it could impact her. Caring about others simply isn’t how MT and FD are the wired.

Officers then tried to appeal to MT to simply do the right thing and help them find JF. Again this fell flat. MT Didnt care about doing the right thing, she just cared about herself going to prison but even in this her attitude was why are you all doing this to me? It was stunning stuff to see someone basically saying without blinking an eye that they did nothing wrong and then seemed bothered to even have to explain their timeline.

What tripped me up in understanding all this is that eventually LE did appeal to MT self interest with a deal which I thought might have worked given how she is wired. But, it didn’t and the only thing I can come up with is that truth isn’t possible because even for someone like MT that doesn’t recognize right and wrong, it’s simply too painful and horrifying to talk about.

I don’t think MT thinks anything she did is wrong but talking about it is for whatever reason painful to her, possibly only because she is being confronted and is caught with no way out. MT doesn't like being told she did something wrong or even questioned about her choices.

I think officers see people that have committed horrible crimes but I’m not so sure that they see true sociopathy or psychopathy on a routine basis. They see anger or frustration or fear and people doing stupid things etc. So running into FD and MT imo was unusual for them and it took a minute for them to figure out who and what they were dealing with.

The law enforcement interview was fascinating as the officers wrongly imo assumed that MT would want to help find a missing JF who was a fellow mother and had 5 children. MT could care less about helping and we saw this in her statement to them when she said, “I’ve already given 3 weeks to this thing”!

MT during most of the first and second interviews appeared bothered every time things circled back to helping find JF as MT doesn't help others, she just helps herself. So, we saw frustration about questions that had nothing to do with her and then this turned into anger about “why am I even here as I’ve done nothin”! I think MT has spent her whole life seeing that she is never involved in doing anything wrong, she simply never sees it and she can’t talk about. I do
Wish they had brought in a psychologist as part of the team early on as perhaps that might have helped.

MT is no push over and she can give as good as she gets and she can argue, push and manipulate in many respects as well as FD and we see this over and over.

The thing for me at least that makes understanding why MT stayed with FD for many many years even after she found out he lied to her and the family about the fact that his divorce, initially was something I found difficult to understand given the way MT describes herself.

Think about it, you move yourself and your daughter, find out you were lied to and lied to for a long time and yet you stay in a situation that you yourself describe as “two years of hell in Connecticut”?

MT knew she had been lied to as early as 2017 and yet she stays and she was not coerced and she was not abused by her own accounts in the Law Enforcement interviews. No, when asked she said FD treated her well and she was never in fear. I think she was deluded about the potential for wealth pure and simple.

I think what tripped me up trying to understand the situation with the couple was the fact that not only did FD lie about the divorce, FD lied about the money, FD lied about the couples future prospects, frankly he lied about who he was as a person. AND Yet, MT willingly chose to stay.

Narcissists I think are brilliant at understanding certain aspects of people that those people sometimes might not even acknowledge in themselves. It’s for this reason that I think FD saw in MT someone who in many ways was the mirror of himself and I think at the core of FD was deeply insecure but also driven by tremendous greed and ambition for money without having to work for it. I also think FD saw in MT deep greed and a craving for a life where she too could do all those things she loves to do be it riding, skiing or traveling etc. But I do think the thing that attracted MT to FD was that neither were constrained by a moral driven core, ethics or the ability or willingness to care for others or take responsibility for their actions.

I think MT stayed with FD not because he duped her or threatened her or controlled her. Nope. MT knew about the FD lies, all of them, but she stayed because she believed and trusted he would be able to give her what was important to her and that was money and comfort. MT simply cares about MT and that is it imo. She isn’t motivated to help others or care for others as her life is all about her all the time imo. This is why seeing the PR of MT making cookies with Mama Troconis for charity was simply laughable. Both of these women at their core believe that the best charity in the world is themselves!

MT didnt care about the FD lies because lying was something she did as well, if not better than FD. MT Didnt care about the manipulation of FD because she did that probably better than FD too. MT stayed because she knew that together they were stronger than either by themselves and they were bound by mutual greed for what JF and her family had which was money. Love was probably just another tool the couple used to manipulate the other and was something neither of them had the capacity to give or understand at the most basic level.

FD picked well in MT imo because there was literally nothing she wasn’t willing to do ever if it was in pursuit of what she wanted. Boundless greed, self absorption and grandiose plans bound the couple together and I think it’s why MT stayed after being lied to about virtually everything. This was a couple kept together by self interest and greed pure and simple. The couples target was the Farber wealth and lifestyle and they were willing to kill to get it.

I was also tripped up about seeing MT following instructions from FD around the time of the murder. During this period we see over and over MT (strong, independent woman by her own admission) taking orders but also very willingly imo which in my mind said she knew what their goals as a couple were and she was willing to do things she didn't usually do without question. MT is a brilliant soldier but only when she is all in with the plan! When asked to go to Home Depot with an odd shopping list, many others would have questioned items on the list imo. Not MT. I don’t think she questioned it because she knew it was part of the plan. MT went to “clean” when even though she never did that task and found being asked to do it annoying.

MT excluded the trip down Albany from her non alibi script because she knew what was going on and she knew it didn’t look good for her but was necessary for their plan.

She blindly went back and forth from 4JX to MS after the murder doing FD bidding because she knew it was important to the plan.

MT saw nothing wrong in anything she did and I do hope the jury sees this and realise that she stayed of her own free will whilst knowing of all of FDs lies and manipulation. Ditto for entire Troconis Crew who continue to spew lies and misinformation on social media along with their paid puppet, TP.

Remorse, empathy, guilt and reflection are sadly not in the MT and FD emotional dna imo.

MOO
 
Last edited:
  • #405
I think I remember the home you are talking about, painted bright white as I recall.. 2 story, with a covered patio at the second level to one side, and a daylight basement. The property sloped down from the street, so that at the street you looked down at the home. It was all white and gray inside, like other ForeGroup properties, but was more modest in square footage. I remember thinking, looking at the photos of the interior... I bet ForeGroup funded all the furnishings (that is, Farber $ paid to furnish Fotis' girlfriend's home).

I've looked through my notes and not yet been able to recover the address. Will keep looking.
123 Hunter, West Hartford, CT.
 
  • #406
Here is basically the whole KM warrant. It does not give a lot of information as to how they can prove a conspiracy. There is definitely something omitted that directly ties him to what happened to Jennifer. Notice how KM is not charged with tampering, but only with conspiracy. Does that mean they don’t think he helped dispose of Jennifer? I really hope they have much more than this.
I think it’s the opposite of what you stated. They can implicate him for conspiracy (ie murder) but he didn’t participate in the tampering/cover up like FD and MT.
MOO
 
  • #407
Duplicate edited
 
Last edited:
  • #408
she’s not even a good sociopath because she doesn’t lie well. She’s just an idiot is what she is.
 
  • #409
They obviously conspired, but how is the state going to prove that MT and KM knew beforehand that the plan was to kill JD? Couldn’t they theoretically say that they conspired to commit assault against Jennifer, but it did not go according to plan? How do they prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was prior knowledge that the act of murder would be committed by FD?

Cops can trace burners pretty easily, unless paid with cash, but even then, you can still trace the number back to where the number was purchased if you pull camera footage. This would allow them to get the texts and pings from the phone provider.

I bet they have pings and texts from their burners that they thought they would get away with. This is what I think is missing that we have not seen that fills the gaps in the timeline.

I think it is going to get a lot worse for the defendants. I think the attorney knows she is completely screwed as well. She’s not even a good sociopath because anyone with a brain can see she doesn’t lie well. She’s just an idiot is what she is.
Mayo Clinic Definition of Antisocial Personality Disorder (aka sociopathy) - See what you think:

Antisocial personality disorder, sometimes called sociopathy, is a mental health condition in which a person consistently shows no regard for right and wrong and ignores the rights and feelings of others. People with antisocial personality disorder tend to purposely make others angry or upset and manipulate or treat others harshly or with cruel indifference. They lack remorse or do not regret their behavior.

Symptoms​

Symptoms of antisocial personality disorder include repeatedly:

  • Ignoring right and wrong.
  • Telling lies to take advantage of others.
  • Not being sensitive to or respectful of others.
  • Using charm or wit to manipulate others for personal gain or pleasure.
  • Having a sense of superiority and being extremely opinionated.
  • Having problems with the law, including criminal behavior.
  • Being hostile, aggressive, violent or threatening to others.
  • Feeling no guilt about harming others.
  • Doing dangerous things with no regard for the safety of self or others.
  • Being irresponsible and failing to fulfill work or financial responsibilities.
Adults with antisocial personality disorder usually show symptoms of conduct disorder before the age of 15. Symptoms of conduct disorder include serious, ongoing behavior problems, such as:

  • Aggression toward people and animals.
  • Destruction of property.
  • Lying and dishonesty.
  • Theft.
  • Serious violation of rules.;;
Antisocial personality disorder is considered a lifelong condition. But in some people, certain symptoms ― particularly destructive and criminal behavior ― may decrease over time. It's not clear whether this decrease is a result of the effect aging has on their mind and body, an increased awareness of the impact that antisocial behavior has had on their life, or other factors.

People with antisocial personality disorder often violate the law, becoming criminals. They may lie, behave violently or impulsively, and have problems with drug and alcohol use. They have difficulty consistently meeting responsibilities related to family, work or school.

////////////

FWIW, MT was sent away by her parents as a teen for a multiyear period in the US for counselling, possibly related to drugs/alchohol as well as issues with behaviour. Her stay at the "farm" is well documented and can easily be found if you look for it.

MT has no consistent documented work history and has survived through the money of her family or the largess of her current boyfriends, baby daddy and her former husband.
 
Last edited:
  • #410
One of the most fascinating revelations to me was the part of the police interrogation when police start leaving the room, and Troconis literally gets on her knees in an extremely submissive way and begs her attorney to convey to her daughter that she loves her.

As if that is the important part: Troconis is a good mother who loves her daughter, not that her daughter is loved and cared for. She could have begged to make sure she is cared for, and that she is secure in knowing her mother would be there now if she could, and her mother will be with her again. That is not the same thing as a rough variation of tell my daughter I'm a good mother, even though you have to endure my arrest right now. A much more selfish message than tell my daughter that I will make sure she getsthe love and care she needs.

But on her knees, begging and crying put the power 100% in attoney Bowman's hands to anoint her a good mother, or not. In the position she assumed, she was nearly in place to perform a submissive sex act. It seemed to annoy Bowman, who had no intention to control her sense of self worth or humiliate her. But it was one more piece of data as to what the dynamic between Troconis and Dulos likely was. I believe LE more than Troconis about that dynamic. I think she was in danger from him like LE said, not that they fought a lot and she was an equal participant as she said.

This does not mean she is not a co-conspirator to murder. Innocent until proven, of course, but I think she is likely guilty on all charges.

I also think she was in a far more abusive relationship than she realized-she probably still doesn't know it now.

MOO
I keep thinking about the issue of whether MT was in danger at any point with FD as LE believed.

I believe both FD and MT needed each other to commit this crime and each realised that. This fact, if true, would protect MT for a period of time and I do think this is why she claimed to not be in fear of FD (I believe she made a true statement on that at least) in the interviews as she was essentially acknowledging how important she was to FD at that time and likely felt like she had a good amount of control in the relationship.. So, around the time of the murder I think MT wouldn't have been harmed by FD as he clearly needed her. MT power was knowing the plan and knowing enough details to be able to harm FD.

Where she might have been vulnerable or in danger possibly was after the entire scenario played out, the 5 dulos children were under the control of the couple etc. and for some reason MT no longer wanted to do what FD wanted her to do or if she asked for something he had no intention of giving, such as marriage. Threatening or even manipulating FD could have been possibly dangerous. But, I think she is most likely such an accomplished manipulator that she would have figured out a way to continue to do what she wanted to do within the boundaries of what FD would accept.

Dissent from MT would have been dealt with harshly by FD possibly with physical harm, psychological torture or withholding money or privileges etc. Most likely MT would have fought back as she can give as good as FD imo and the situation could have escalated and ended in something dramatic and possibly violent. I don't think MT was wired in the same way as JF so she was not imo as vulnerable to the psychological torture and threats FD routinely inflicted on JF. FD knew how to control the people in his life but with MT it would have been a challenge vs the more vulnerable JF but perhaps it would have been as simple as simply not giving her money or taking away her car etc. It would have been a volatile relationship as each craved to control the other and neither most likely trusted the other. I think the relationship and hook ups continued as long as mutual benefit lasted for each member of the relationship.

My guess is that had the couple not been caught (and the Fore Group collapse not happened) that MT would have been perfectly content ruling the roost at 4JX (her goal of life of leisure with no work) and possibly taking care of the children (reason in FD mind she was there along with providing sex) while FD would continue to manipulate and control her while also continuing to have affairs as he seemed incapable of monogamy but this probably would have been the case for MT as well. My sense is that the relationships MT and FD had were always transactional in nature. I'm sure both/either professed endless love but I don't for a second believe either had the capacity for love ad caring in a traditional sense.

But we ultimately saw that MT was deemed worthless/not useful by FD as he promptly stopped hooking up with her once he had Anna Curry and her money to support him.

MOO
 
  • #411
Mayo Clinic Definition of Antisocial Personality Disorder (aka sociopathy) - See what you think:

Antisocial personality disorder, sometimes called sociopathy, is a mental health condition in which a person consistently shows no regard for right and wrong and ignores the rights and feelings of others. People with antisocial personality disorder tend to purposely make others angry or upset and manipulate or treat others harshly or with cruel indifference. They lack remorse or do not regret their behavior.

Symptoms​

Symptoms of antisocial personality disorder include repeatedly:

  • Ignoring right and wrong.
  • Telling lies to take advantage of others.
  • Not being sensitive to or respectful of others.
  • Using charm or wit to manipulate others for personal gain or pleasure.
  • Having a sense of superiority and being extremely opinionated.
  • Having problems with the law, including criminal behavior.
  • Being hostile, aggressive, violent or threatening to others.
  • Feeling no guilt about harming others.
  • Doing dangerous things with no regard for the safety of self or others.
  • Being irresponsible and failing to fulfill work or financial responsibilities.
Adults with antisocial personality disorder usually show symptoms of conduct disorder before the age of 15. Symptoms of conduct disorder include serious, ongoing behavior problems, such as:

  • Aggression toward people and animals.
  • Destruction of property.
  • Lying and dishonesty.
  • Theft.
  • Serious violation of rules.;;
Antisocial personality disorder is considered a lifelong condition. But in some people, certain symptoms ― particularly destructive and criminal behavior ― may decrease over time. It's not clear whether this decrease is a result of the effect aging has on their mind and body, an increased awareness of the impact that antisocial behavior has had on their life, or other factors.

People with antisocial personality disorder often violate the law, becoming criminals. They may lie, behave violently or impulsively, and have problems with drug and alcohol use. They have difficulty consistently meeting responsibilities related to family, work or school.

////////////

FWIW, MT was sent away by her parents as a teen for a multiyear period in the US for counselling, possibly related to drugs/alchohol as well as issues with behaviour. Her stay at the "farm" is well documented and can easily be found if you look for it.

MT has no consistent documented work history and has survived through the money of her family or the largess of her current boyfriends, baby daddy and her former husband.
For whatever it's worth, here are my notes on MT's work history:

MT has worked as a TV Host, in Marketing, Event Planning and worked at her sister’s shoe cover company, but I’m not sure in what capacity. And the Fore Group!
She worked in public relations at the Ghantoot Racing & Polo Club in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates from 2000 to 2003.
According to her Linkedin profile she, “Participated in organizing and setting up the Marketing Department in conjunction with the chairman His Highness Sheikh Falah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan … Coordinated all the polo tournaments in the polo club including the most important one the ‘Khalifa Tournament’ during the polo season from October thru May … Coordinated the invitation, activities and accommodations of the best polo players from Argentina and the world to come and play for the season at Ghantoot. Talented and famous players such as the Heguy Brothers, Adolfo Cambiaso, the Estrada brothers, etc came and participated … Responsible for all the media communication such as TV shows, a variety of magazines and digital media nationwide and abroad to cover every event.”
 
  • #412
For whatever it's worth, here are my notes on MT's work history:

MT has worked as a TV Host, in Marketing, Event Planning and worked at her sister’s shoe cover company, but I’m not sure in what capacity. And the Fore Group!
She worked in public relations at the Ghantoot Racing & Polo Club in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates from 2000 to 2003.
According to her Linkedin profile she, “Participated in organizing and setting up the Marketing Department in conjunction with the chairman His Highness Sheikh Falah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan … Coordinated all the polo tournaments in the polo club including the most important one the ‘Khalifa Tournament’ during the polo season from October thru May … Coordinated the invitation, activities and accommodations of the best polo players from Argentina and the world to come and play for the season at Ghantoot. Talented and famous players such as the Heguy Brothers, Adolfo Cambiaso, the Estrada brothers, etc came and participated … Responsible for all the media communication such as TV shows, a variety of magazines and digital media nationwide and abroad to cover every event.”
Yes.

What is interesting is that no job seemed to last very long for whatever reason.

She also worked for FORE for a period of time and my recollection was we learned of it in civil trial deposition. Her salary was $120,000 yr. In the interviews she denied this but her statement was false as the books were partially reviewed in the civil trial and that was when all the accounting irregularities were uncovered even though FD denied everything. I personally think MT knew almost everything there was to know about FD activities as she even knew about his option deals so must have simply hung around to overhear everything, even though her tasks were more marketing. I don’t think she told law enforcement the truth on her involvement with FORE at all as she totally distanced herself from it. Bowman if you recall pulled a rabbit out the hat and was able to prevent her from being deposed in the civil trial. But she knew all about FD accounting games at Fore imo.

The event planning seemed to be something in one way or another that she came back to imo. Maybe she is a good organiser?

Moo
 
Last edited:
  • #413
Yes.

What is interesting is that no job seemed to last very long for whatever reason.

She also worked for FORE for a period of time and my recollection was we learned of it in civil trial deposition. Her salary was $120,000 yr. In the interviews she denied this but her statement was false as the books were partially reviewed in the civil trial and that was when all the accounting irregularities were uncovered even though FD denied everything. I personally think MT knew almost everything was to know about FD activities.

The event planning seemed to be something in one way or another that she came back to imo. Maybe she is a good organiser?

Moo
If you look on her sister's FB "Daniela Troconis" I think that's MT modeling the shoe covers holding an umbrella? I'm not sure how to add attachements, so not able to include on this thread. So maybe she modeled shoe covers for her sister's company?
 
  • #414
If you look on her sister's FB "Daniela Troconis" I think that's MT modeling the shoe covers holding an umbrella? I'm not sure how to add attachements, so not able to include on this thread. So maybe she modeled shoe covers for her sister's company?
Yes, that shoe cover enterprise was quite entertaining.
 
  • #415
Well put and interesting theory!

The psychology of MT and the MT/FD relationship have been long discussed topics in this case for the last four years and I think we could probably go on for another 50 threads on the issues involved.

MT in the Law Enforcement interviews described herself as “dominant”’and “strong”’and even “aggressive ” with the ability to stand up for herself in a relationship with an equally dominant, strong and aggressive FD. Yet we saw her down on her knees to the one male who she thought could save her!

Based on everything I’ve seen in this case that act of MT on her knees showed precisely who she is. She is someone who with no regard for others (or her own dignity) will do whatever it takes, including degrading herself, to manipulate others to do what she wants. Kneeling down to atty bowman gave the message to him of clear submission and also sent the message to him of what else she might do for him if he helped her (her usual MO is always sex). Atty bowman was imo visually disgusted as would most people with a moral code might be! The scene is so imo Latina drama over the top that it’s best watched without sound as the words coming from MT about her love for her daughter don’t matter to her but are meant purely to attempt to manipulate atty bowman. Love is just another tool in the MT manipulation toolbox. It was stunning to watch as I think that was when MT first realized she was in a mess and couldn’t escape or run away as she usually does. I also believe atty bowman ran for the hills when he then realized who MT was and what she was wrapped up with along with FD.

How many criminals when given an opportunity for a deal then turn around and continue to lie and do so multiple times? Imo those who know there is no way to tell the truth. We seen even after 2 month time gap in the third interview where MT could have come clean, she simply wasn’t able to do it. Stunning stuff.

What I think law enforcement and certainly atty bowman didn’t understand initially is that MT has no boundaries (like FD) and also has no right and wrong in her psychological makeup as most people understand them in a traditional religious and moral sense. These are folks that will do whatever it takes, never think they do anything wrong and will see consequence's purely as unwarranted persecution. Guilt and the concept of doing the right thing are not how these people are wired. These are people that only care about themselves always.

We saw law enforcement trying to first appeal to MT as a mother to find JF or even care about her own daughter if she goes to prison and I think the males in the room were surprised when that tactic fell flat. MT imo doesn't care about her daughter other than as a tool to have a lifestyle with a wealthy baby daddy and she certainly didn’t care about the dulos children other than for the money they represented and how it could impact her. Caring about others simply isn’t how MT and FD are the wired.

Officers then tried to appeal to MT to simply do the right thing and help them find JF. Again this fell flat. MT Didnt care about doing the right thing, she just cared about herself going to prison but even in this her attitude was why are you all doing this to me? It was stunning stuff to see someone basically saying without blinking an eye that they did nothing wrong and then seemed bothered to even have to explain their timeline.

What tripped me up in understanding all this is that eventually LE did appeal to MT self interest with a deal which I thought might have worked given how she is wired. But, it didn’t and the only thing I can come up with is that truth isn’t possible because even for someone like MT that doesn’t recognize right and wrong, it’s simply too painful and horrifying to talk about.

I don’t think MT thinks anything she did is wrong but talking about it is for whatever reason painful to her, possibly only because she is being confronted and is caught with no way out. MT doesn't like being told she did something wrong or even questioned about her choices.

I think officers see people that have committed horrible crimes but I’m not so sure that they see true sociopathy or psychopathy on a routine basis. They see anger or frustration or fear and people doing stupid things etc. So running into FD and MT imo was unusual for them and it took a minute for them to figure out who and what they were dealing with.

The law enforcement interview was fascinating as the officers wrongly imo assumed that MT would want to help find a missing JF who was a fellow mother and had 5 children. MT could care less about helping and we saw this in her statement to them when she said, “I’ve already given 3 weeks to this thing”!

MT during most of the first and second interviews appeared bothered every time things circled back to helping find JF as MT doesn't help others, she just helps herself. So, we saw frustration about questions that had nothing to do with her and then this turned into anger about “why am I even here as I’ve done nothin”! I think MT has spent her whole life seeing that she is never involved in doing anything wrong, she simply never sees it and she can’t talk about. I do
Wish they had brought in a psychologist as part of the team early on as perhaps that might have helped.

MT is no push over and she can give as good as she gets and she can argue, push and manipulate in many respects as well as FD and we see this over and over.

The thing for me at least that makes understanding why MT stayed with FD for many many years even after she found out he lied to her and the family about the fact that his divorce, initially was something I found difficult to understand given the way MT describes herself.

Think about it, you move yourself and your daughter, find out you were lied to and lied to for a long time and yet you stay in a situation that you yourself describe as “two years of hell in Connecticut”?

MT knew she had been lied to as early as 2017 and yet she stays and she was not coerced and she was not abused by her own accounts in the Law Enforcement interviews. No, when asked she said FD treated her well and she was never in fear. I think she was deluded about the potential for wealth pure and simple.

I think what tripped me up trying to understand the situation with the couple was the fact that not only did FD lie about the divorce, FD lied about the money, FD lied about the couples future prospects, frankly he lied about who he was as a person. AND Yet, MT willingly chose to stay.

Narcissists I think are brilliant at understanding certain aspects of people that those people sometimes might not even acknowledge in themselves. It’s for this reason that I think FD saw in MT someone who in many ways was the mirror of himself and I think at the core of FD was deeply insecure but also driven by tremendous greed and ambition for money without having to work for it. I also think FD saw in MT deep greed and a craving for a life where she too could do all those things she loves to do be it riding, skiing or traveling etc. But I do think the thing that attracted MT to FD was that neither were constrained by a moral driven core, ethics or the ability or willingness to care for others or take responsibility for their actions.

I think MT stayed with FD not because he duped her or threatened her or controlled her. Nope. MT knew about the FD lies, all of them, but she stayed because she believed and trusted he would be able to give her what was important to her and that was money and comfort. MT simply cares about MT and that is it imo. She isn’t motivated to help others or care for others as her life is all about her all the time imo. This is why seeing the PR of MT making cookies with Mama Troconis for charity was simply laughable. Both of these women at their core believe that the best charity in the world is themselves!

MT didnt care about the FD lies because lying was something she did as well, if not better than FD. MT Didnt care about the manipulation of FD because she did that probably better than FD too. MT stayed because she knew that together they were stronger than either by themselves and they were bound by mutual greed for what JF and her family had which was money. Love was probably just another tool the couple used to manipulate the other and was something neither of them had the capacity to give or understand at the most basic level.

FD picked well in MT imo because there was literally nothing she wasn’t willing to do ever if it was in pursuit of what she wanted. Boundless greed, self absorption and grandiose plans bound the couple together and I think it’s why MT stayed after being lied to about virtually everything. This was a couple kept together by self interest and greed pure and simple. The couples target was the Farber wealth and lifestyle and they were willing to kill to get it.

I was also tripped up about seeing MT following instructions from FD around the time of the murder. During this period we see over and over MT (strong, independent woman by her own admission) taking orders but also very willingly imo which in my mind said she knew what their goals as a couple were and she was willing to do things she didn't usually do without question. MT is a brilliant soldier but only when she is all in with the plan! When asked to go to Home Depot with an odd shopping list, many others would have questioned items on the list imo. Not MT. I don’t think she questioned it because she knew it was part of the plan. MT went to “clean” when even though she never did that task and found being asked to do it annoying.

MT excluded the trip down Albany from her non alibi script because she knew what was going on and she knew it didn’t look good for her but was necessary for their plan.

She blindly went back and forth from 4JX to MS after the murder doing FD bidding because she knew it was important to the plan.

MT saw nothing wrong in anything she did and I do hope the jury sees this and realise that she stayed of her own free will whilst knowing of all of FDs lies and manipulation. Ditto for entire Troconis Crew who continue to spew lies and misinformation on social media along with their paid puppet, TP.

Remorse, empathy, guilt and reflection are sadly not in the MT and FD emotional dna imo.

MOO
I am no psychologist or psychiatrist, but two particular points it seems emphasize this person MT and their beliefs or behavior: the thong underwear display (was it?); and ‘FT came in to shower with me’ in the morning.

Those points ring like ‘cat nip’ IMO. The latter almost serves to illustrate what she believes her importance of being desired, while also perhaps almost being degrading or diminishing?

And on the musings in other recent threads about the defense attorney perspective. I agree, word salad can be so amusing and interesting. I guess if I was a defense attorney (which I am not), and was making ~$750 or more an hour (a guess) I could find a positive way to say something about my client. MOO
 
  • #416
One telling moment from the 2nd video was when the female detective was asking her about the conversation MT had with Fd when he returned from NYC the day after the disappearance.

In front of whoever was assembled (I can't recall but it seemed like more than 2 people), she made the joke about Fd in jail and having sex. MT was surprised that they had spoken to all of those people. I think even more surprised that those people had relayed that joke to the police.

I think she knew then and there that there was no conversation or action that was off the table to investigate. Bowman matter of factly says they talked to everyone.

IMHO, this is when she really attempts to become an ally with the police but still does not want to say anything. The LE in the room were all trying to get her too comfortable and in a mindset that she was there to help. BUT, she knew that they saw her base level thinking so she called herself stupid.

I must say I liked when the female detective interjected--- the texts to get back with Jennifer and, then, the discussion of getting arrested in NYC and sex.
 
  • #417
If you look on her sister's FB "Daniela Troconis" I think that's MT modeling the shoe covers holding an umbrella? I'm not sure how to add attachements, so not able to include on this thread. So maybe she modeled shoe covers for her sister's company?
Just putting this random info here as I wasn’t sure if it were you or @Diddian or someone else trying to figure out the FD citizenship.

In reading through the civil court case documents it wasn’t quite clear how he answered the question in the deposition to me. He was playing Opposite Day on so many questions and honestly it was hard to follow but I think it was by design. We also have issue of long history of FD lying under oath and to see Judge write about it all just search out the statements of Judge Heller in family court when FD was deemed unfit and unsafe for the children and he (AND MT) were banned for a period of time from seeing the children until he undertook court ordered treatment with a psychologist for asking his children to lie about MT and her daughter being at 4jx. This event imo started the downward spiral and I do believe it had to do with the couple being banned from visitation. Due to what appeared a court order or atty error to NOT exclude MT daughter from communication with the dulos children it seemed like the couple used MT daughter to communicate with the dulos children. I believe this error was eventually corrected by JF but the damage had been done but I think it shows the evil and poor character of the couple to use innocent children to further their games. MT effectively used her then 11-12 year old daughter to skirt the court order which she and FD were very angry about. It was deplorable behaviour imo but par for the course imo with the couple.

Anyway, back to citizenship. In the civil depo it seemed like because he was born in turkey he had always retained that passport. When the family moved to Greece he might (vague in the depo imo) have obtained a passport, might have needed it for school etc. Guess here is that he never dropped Turkish passport because Greece I believe allows dual citizenship but he lapsed the Greek passport at some point unknown.

He then moved to US and at some point did get US citizenship. It is unclear but it seemed at some point he might have dropped the Greek passport but it seems did attempt to get it reinstated during the period he was trying to get his children Greek passports so he could take them away from JF. This drama was played out in family court and Judge ruled that the children’s passports had to be placed with JF atty or the GAL who at the time was atty Meehan before he was terminated by the court I believe for his role in the infamous and discredited DR Herman report and it’s being leaked despite being sealed. Fwiw I remain shocked Atty Meehan still has a license after that horrible and imo highly unethical episode.

I looked on the AA as sometimes citizenship is listed there. I could have sworn that the old form used by NCPD had citizenship FD listed as US but I could only find the new form AA which so far as I could tell did not list citizenship.

Just to close loop on citizenship iirc MT did not disclose her possession of a Venezuelan passport to law enforcement. We also don’t know if she had any legal standing in Argentina after having lived there for a good period of time. My great concern has always been flight with MT and my understanding is that Venezuela will not extradite back to US.

MOO
 
Last edited:
  • #418
I'm speculating, but I think his US citizenship was granted via 1st marriage (not employment). Ernst and Young does not find you a sponsor. They may help you with paperwork, but they are not in the business of actually finding you a person to sponsor you.
 
  • #419
I'm speculating, but I think his US citizenship was granted via 1st marriage (not employment). Ernst and Young does not find you a sponsor. They may help you with paperwork, but they are not in the business of actually finding you a person to sponsor you.
Yes, that was always my suspicion too. He most likely had student visa at Brown but needed to deal with citizenship in order to stay in US and work.
 
  • #420
Kaen said:
snipped by me...

One telling moment from the 2nd video was when the female detective was asking her about the conversation MT had with Fd when he returned from NYC the day after the disappearance.

Wait - a female detective was ALSO in the interview/interrogation in Bowman's office? Anyone know her name - have not seen it in any articles. I would like to put this in my notes. TIA! :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
82
Guests online
2,308
Total visitors
2,390

Forum statistics

Threads
632,764
Messages
18,631,454
Members
243,290
Latest member
lhudson
Back
Top