I've posted a bit about the Social Media disinformation (deliberately repeating information known to be false) undertaken by MT, Troconis Crew and "Esteemed Defence Counsel" and their supporters in the Media including the self proclaimed "Seeker of Truth" Shannon Miller of NBC CT.
I just wanted to put this post out to show a bit of what is going on. The post I wrote the other day likened the "Esteemed Defence Counsel" focus on the weather in Farmington on the eve of the JF murder as simply a game of "Three Card Monte", sleight of hand game to change your focus from where it should be. In this "game" he attempts to get focus on the weather and not on the fact that MT lied to LE 3x about her whereabouts and FDs whereabouts on the eve of the murder of VICTIM JF.
The focus on the weather is irrelevant and "Esteemed Defence Counsel" knows it and he also knows he cannot put MT on the stand as she will most likely simply lie again as she seems unable to speak the truth on any topic and he cannot put MT daughter on the stand or introduce either of their phone records because phone records cannot prove who physically made a call.
So, after a game of "Three Care Monte", "Esteemed Defence Counsel" proceeds to stoop even lower with the presentation to Court of a handwritten list of calls written by MT AND ASKS THE JURY TO BELIEVE that a handwritten unsubstantiated list with no corroborating evidence is to be believed? Yep, its what he did and to me it not only smacks of entitlement and arrogance and insulating to the intelligence of the jurors to spend time even entertaining the idea that the paper provided has any value great than that of TOILET PAPER in this case? He was even too lazy to attempt to obtain official records from the cell phone provider but as I said this data would prove nothing about who made the call.
Anyway, the above event played out in court and was followed by the following Social Media post from MT with yet more pictures of driveways 80MS. It was as if the ridiculousness of the display in court first with the wrong time of weather activity etc. had never happened but by the skeptical faces of the jurors who knew a CON MAN on the STREET CORNER trying to scam them with a good game of "Three Card Monte" never happened either.
i find the approach by "Esteemed Defence Counsel" patronising, insulting but ultimately foolish because the lack of preparation seems to be tainting virtually every aspect of the Defence "testimony cross" see this past week. But, ultimately the presentation is highly cynical as is the lack of knowledge about the mounds of evidence that it is his responsibility to know thoroughly along with very basic technical forensic terminology which was repeatedly butchered over the past two weeks.
Here is the social media post to which I referred to above and see what you think about this entire ridiculous line of rebuttal for MT being unable, unwilling etc. to say either where FD or she were on the eve of the murder of VICTIM, JF.