Still Missing CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #61

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #281
There’s a world of difference between paying a retired person to return to work to be the expert explaining her own work which was previously undertaken FOR the state
And
Paying a third party professional expert witness

And Ms Roy clearly a thorough, careful, employee who appears to have done her job by the book.
So agree. She was entitled to be paid for her time and work and to say otherwise I think would be totally wrong. I'm glad she is back and making even more money to add to her retirement nest egg!

She was a thorough professional today and withstood many hours of ill informed questioning from the "Esteemed Defence Counsel"!
MOO
 
  • #282
Completely agree. I think the fact that Easter was almost a month earlier but used as a ploy right before the 24th shows this was probably being planned for a while.
2019 - “Greek” Easter was 29 April - full month before 22 May …
 
  • #283
Atty Weinstein is imo quite possibly one of the ONLY bright lights (other than GF and children of course!) in this horrific case. He also went after Atty Pattis and via the settlement stopped Pattis from talking or writing about the case for 40 years or so iirc to protect legacy of FD.

He also brilliantly assisted GF to gain some level of justice in the Civil Case against FD and FORE even while FD and his friends worked so hard to keep any cash from GF via the houses etc. FORE was a true rats nest of accounting and tax irregularities and so Atty Weinstein had to pick his battles but he did battle and battled fair and hard with great dingnity against a crew of lawyers and FD who had no issue lying on the stand in Court or in depositions.

Frankly I would very like like to see his exceptional talent and keen understanding of justice deployed against MT and the Troconis Crew in a Civil Case but that can be another topic for another day as this trial must be completed first imo.

MOO
I knew you would have much more to add.
 
  • #284
Ready for the next one?
 
  • #285
JS trying to break Ms Roy. He can see she is nervous, but she knows her job and her notes. None of her tests identify victims, perpetrators or accomplices - so he’s wasting his time just trying to make it look like it’s all fake tests … of course he knows the results of all the dna tests, it’s in the evidence bundle. Is that panty liner MT? And he’s trying to say that bag was separate from the shirt & bra? It could be JFs, odd her bottoms not found and this liner was not blood soaked like the shirt and bra. Panty liner and the adhesive going to have mucho material biologico … hope we find out before the weekend.
One panty liner in a huge black bin liner is weird. Is it part of MT guilty clothes for disposal? Or more of JF clothes.
BBM:
Trying to catch up so not sure if anyone has commented on panty liner but, in one of MT's interviews ....
(we gogogo, we turn, I make salad, I squeeze oranges, I take shower, I get $25 gift card, blah blah blah)
she says, "I go to bathroom, because I have my period". I'm thinking it could be her panty liner.
ETA: BBM
 
Last edited:
  • #286
I knew you would have much more to add.
Haha! You know me well my friend! Sorry, but I think he is absolutely fantastic and couldn’t resist your great set up post either! I also have had zero that is positive to say about CT attorneys after the FD parade of legal bad boys of CT Law, but Weinstein is chefs kiss in every way! I’m a fan!!! MOO
 
  • #287
Haha! You know me well my friend! Sorry, but I think he is absolutely fantastic and couldn’t resist your great set up post either! I also have had zero that is positive to say about CT attorneys after the FD parade of legal bad boys of CT Law, but Weinstein is chefs kiss in every way! I’m a fan!!! MOO
Don't be sorry.It was good information!
 
  • #288

The movers.
 
  • #289
Lengthy but good review. Gets into the defendant's 3rd interview and Kent Mawhinney.
 
  • #290
The panty liner --

What are the chances both the defendant and JFd would be using them at the same time? The defendant overshared during her interview so, if we believe her, then either that's hers or it's JFd's. And if it's the defendant's, that makes a really compelling argument for the charges levied against her.

JMO
I’m just thinking - if it was JFd’ s it would still be attached to her underpants? Just saying - if it was discarded in trash, it would be singular. If JFd was ( pardon my reference) “done away with” - it would be attached to her undies. Did they check the fiber attached to the adhesive? Could determine type of undies.
 
  • #291
I don't know what it was but....
Megnut I just want to thank you for your coverage every day. So detailed throughout. Meanwhile you also manage to keep up with the chat?!? Amazing!! MOO
 
  • #292
A video of GF's attorney from years ago.
wow, never saw this before! thank you for sharing, and thank goodness in the face of so much darkness these kids have been in the hands of a clearly competent grandmother.
 
  • #293
Looks like FD wasn't the only one who liked to 'keep things moving':
For some lighter news after a day of tough forensic evidence (cannot even think of story behind the jaw fragment with teeth), here is DM article of MT with, "...new mystery man...":
 
  • #294
Looks like FD wasn't the only one who liked to 'keep things moving':
For some lighter news after a day of tough forensic evidence (cannot even think of story behind the jaw fragment with teeth), here is DM article of MT with, "...new mystery man...":
Geez, I was wondering if JS could be her new beau .
 
  • #295
Geez, I was wondering if JS could be her new beau .
That would be shocking...but maybe not....
I do wonder what current BF thinks about it all sitting in on the trial...can only imagine....
Asking myself if I would ever attend trial of current hook up who is being tried for conspiracy to commit murder?
Nah. Not a chance.
Also this was NOT on my bingo card! I mean how could it be? BF attending MT trial.
 
Last edited:
  • #296
Why did JS keep referring to epithelial cells as epidural cells when questioning forensic expert witness Christine Roy today? :rolleyes: Did anyone else catch that? Jmo
 
  • #297
  • #298
As we don't yet know when PG will go to the stand to testify I wanted to put out the series of messages from 'reposter' Shannon Miller of NBC CT who is emerging it sadly seems as the official mouthpiece of the Troconis Crew and "Esteemed Defence Counsel".

This was a statement issued by the Crew regarding 'another suspect' it seems who wasn't being pursued while their 'beloved daughter' is being persecuted and even threw in a reference to 'blind eye of justice'. The Crew also state that immunity was granted to PG 'without a thorough investigataion". Right. With all the testimony we have heard so far (and its nowhere near done imo on PG) does anyone YET believe that LE didn't pull apart the PG story from top to bottom?

I simply don't know what to make of clearly false statements like these as I believe this one to refer to PG who has been cleared by CT LE. How in the world can "Esteemed Defence Counsel" think that statements such as these made by the Troconis Crew which are patently FALSE are a good idea for his client?

I do hope Atty Urso examines these statements as I wonder if they cross into the territory of defamation both by the Troconis Crew and NBC CT who know these statements to be FALSE? At a minimum I believe Atty Urso could ask NBC CT to remove the statements of the Troconis Crew as they are factually incorrect aka pure lies imo!

I find it interesting that this rosary carrying and courtroom praying Crew are choosing via public statements (blindly reposted with zero context by "I'm not a Reporter Shannon Miller" who makes no note that PG was cleared by LE) to continue to persecute an innocent man who was by all accounts put through "HELL" by FD and MT in the events surrounding the murder of VICTIM, JF as they tried to frame him for the murder of JF.

I almost think these social media posts deserve special attention and fact checking so will work on it as time permits as to see this disinformation posted by Shannon Miller NBC CT with no context is something that I believe to be absolutely professionally irresponsible AT A MINIMUM.

MOO

1706847451069.png
 
Last edited:
  • #299
Why did JS keep referring to epithelial cells as epidural cells when questioning forensic expert witness Christine Roy today? :rolleyes: Did anyone else catch that? Jmo
Yes, caught it and instead of listening to him I spent the time in deep prayer that the witness on the stand would not hurl herself at “Esteemed Defence Counsel” for his continued errors of technical language and that he would then get the mistrial he has been angling for! Can you imagine being an expert witness and having to contend with such errors?

Here is a possible answer for you:


Right up there with SPLATTER vs SPATTER
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0974.jpeg
    IMG_0974.jpeg
    447.4 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
  • #300
That would be shocking...but maybe not....
I do wonder what current BF thinks about it all sitting in on the trial...can only imagine....
Asking myself if I would ever attend trial of current hook up who is being tried for conspiracy to commit murder?
Nah. Not a chance.
Also this was NOT on my bingo card! I mean how could it be? BF attending MT trial.
Now honestly I was being sarcastic , but not off the table imo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
50
Guests online
1,893
Total visitors
1,943

Forum statistics

Threads
632,474
Messages
18,627,277
Members
243,164
Latest member
thtguuurl
Back
Top