i've been re-reading a lot of stuff from the past 12 mths and the only thing i can consistently see is inconsistencies in GBC's stories and a lot of fancy footwork from his legals with regard to what 'may' have happened to ABC. There has definitely been a lot of clutching at straws and attempts to manipulate information to suit the circumstances at the appropriate time. If you look at the reasons given at both bail hearings by GBC's defence team as to why GBC shouldn't be considered as a suspect, it all looks very 'constructed' and relies purely upon evidence at hand at the time.
At this point, i can only hope that the forensics team that searched the family home was prudent enough to take photos of the garden and i hope that perhaps they found signs of broken/disturbed vegetation that may indicate an impact of some description.
At this point, i can only hope that the forensics team that searched the family home was prudent enough to take photos of the garden and i hope that perhaps they found signs of broken/disturbed vegetation that may indicate an impact of some description.