A federal judge GRANTS Special Counsel Jack Smith's request to file a "comprehensive brief" (up to 180 pages), including a “substantial number of exhibits” in Trump's election subversion case
Probably. With the election campaigns going on, its best not to give anyone a chance to try their case in public on the campaign trail.Is it under seal because of the gag order?
Is it under seal because of the gag order?
So doesn't that mean that the same applies to DJT?Not sure what thread this belongs in, but it is DC and election interference related. So I am hoping this is the correct thread.
Giuliani, who led Trump’s post-election efforts, was formally disbarred in Washington, D.C., on Thursday
The former New York City mayor has also been criminally charged in Arizona for his role in trying to overturn the 2020 election
... he’s also been sued for defamation by voting machine companies Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic.
![]()
All Of Trump's Lawyers Who Have Faced Consequences—As Giuliani Disbarred
Giuliani was stripped of his law license in Washington, D.C., months after being disbarred in New York.www.forbes.com
Trump urges Judge Chutkan to require even greater redactions in Jack Smith's presidenial immunity brief to avoid disclosing sensitive statementes made by witnesses.
Question: Will this release be allowed within 60 days of the election?Jack Smith's team asked to be able to release a public version of the new filing.
"Trump intentionally lied to the public, state election officials, and his own vice president in an effort to cling to power after losing the election, while privately describing some of the claims of election fraud as 'crazy,' prosecutors alleged in the 165-page filing."