- Joined
- Oct 8, 2022
- Messages
- 12,166
- Reaction score
- 119,659
Not all families want that degree of media attention when they're grieving.
Idk why a comprehensive lisr of victims hasnt been released yet.
Not all families want that degree of media attention when they're grieving.
Idk why a comprehensive lisr of victims hasnt been released yet.
Good pointNot all families want that degree of media attention when they're grieving.
Do they even do that anymore? I remember that being routine for passenger lists to be published in the newspapers. The internet makes it too easy to zero in those somebody thinks is at fault and victimize survivors. I’m thinking it was equipment failure. Pilots are so well trained that I doubt they would intentionally break a distance requirement.
Idk why a comprehensive lisr of victims hasnt been released yet.
I certainly think there need to be some major changes in the flight routes, but at the same time there is some misreporting going on here about these routes. Helicopters in this route are requesting and beging given permission to be there but the helicopter pilots are responsible for keeping separation from the jets, ie wait and fly after they pass. The 75' foot issue is technically correct, but but it should never actually be a factor if the helicopter pilots obey their responsibilities. That didn't happen here and we need to know why AND change these routes. But we need to be honest in the discussion.NEW (and sobering) chart released in the NTSB's preliminary report on the midair collision near DCA.Helicopter Route 4 was separated BY ONLY 75 FEET of altitude from the normal approach path to runway 33.This was an accident waiting to happen.
![]()
After deadly midair collision over Potomac, NTSB wants helicopter ban near D.C. area's Reagan Airport
There's an "intolerable risk to aviation safety" with helicopters and planes flying too close to one another near DCA.www.nbcnews.com
The FAA is permanently closing that flight corridor used by the helicopter. It is also looking closely at some other congested flight corridors in other cities.
I wonder to what extent in practice the controllers can truly refuse to allow a military helicopter from entering the air space?Helicopters in this route are requesting and beging given permission to be there but the helicopter pilots are responsible for keeping separation from the jets, ie wait and fly after they pass.
From listing to the testimony, the FAA controls the space. They can deny access to the Army in a normal situation (in declared emergencies I think that changes). But in the situation as it occurred here, the helicopters fly in their corridor and then as they approach the airport flight paths, they request permission to cross from ATC. ATC then advises when they cross and what to be aware of (ie specific traffic approaching). The helicopter are supposed to allow the traffic to cross and then move behind in the gap between planes. It is never ok for a helicopter to be in the same space and attempt to fly under an inbound plane. This is why the whole 75' 100' comments are irrelevant. For reasons still unknown the Army pilots just flew right into the path of the incoming jet. In my opinion, the blame for this accident lays with the Army pilots. Sure, the airspace use was not ideal, but it was workable and if everyone did what the were told this wouldn't have happened. The Army needs to re-address training for its pilots.I wonder to what extent in practice the controllers can truly refuse to allow a military helicopter from entering the air space?
If being granted permission was the expected norm, a better description might be:
Helicopters announce they are entering the airspace. Controllers then acknowledge that they have entered. Helicopter crews then take responsibility to keep "safe" distances of separation.
For reasons still unknown the Army pilots just flew right into the path of the incoming jet.
I can't see how it could be possible they saw the airplane. For some reason(s), they didn't see it.
A helicopter's cabin does not give one 360 degrees of the view. To start with, why did they have only one crew member in the back when two are required? Then, any distraction for one of these three people might be enough.From listing to the testimony, the FAA controls the space. They can deny access to the Army in a normal situation (in declared emergencies I think that changes). But in the situation as it occurred here, the helicopters fly in their corridor and then as they approach the airport flight paths, they request permission to cross from ATC. ATC then advises when they cross and what to be aware of (ie specific traffic approaching). The helicopter are supposed to allow the traffic to cross and then move behind in the gap between planes. It is never ok for a helicopter to be in the same space and attempt to fly under an inbound plane. This is why the whole 75' 100' comments are irrelevant. For reasons still unknown the Army pilots just flew right into the path of the incoming jet. In my opinion, the blame for this accident lays with the Army pilots. Sure, the airspace use was not ideal, but it was workable and if everyone did what the were told this wouldn't have happened. The Army needs to re-address training for its pilots.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.