The only reason I mentioned the odor of a skunk, is because that is a very strong, and distinct odor. In no way am I comparing its smell to that of a decomposing human. I wanted to know if anyone who had smelled a decomposing human after 2 and a half days of decomposing, thought that the odor of said decomposing human was as DISTINCT as the distinct odor of a skunk.
In regard to the empty food containers. Many think there was no residue, since the CSI said there was no food in the white trash bag. I agree that there was most likely food residue that caused an odor that the maggots would be attracted to. The big difference is I believe there was more than just a residue. I believe there was enough food residue in the empty containers to feed 3 generations of maggots, since mathematically the maggots GA and SB heard and saw living and making a popping sound in the white trash bag had to be third generation maggots, and iirc Dr. Vass mentioned in his report that these were third generation maggots. The other big difference is I think that the odor produced by the food residue in the 90 plus sealed trunk was much stronger than just an unpleasant odor.
I know it is possible that the odor from a decomposing body can permeate an area as small as the trunk. Once the decomposing body is removed, the odor will dissipate, however, the smell will remain on the permeated areas. I have tried to find information in regards to the following question, and I have had no luck at all. Once the source of the odor has been removed, will the odor in the permeated areas increase substantially in intensity? All I could find is that once the source is removed, the odor will dissipate, but may linger for a long, long time in the permeated areas. I can find nothing that shows the odor increases once the source is removed. Since GA did not notice the awful odor the day KC returned his gas cans, nor did her boyfriend the day before, I am having trouble figuring out how the odor was so much worse 3 weeks later. As always, my entire post is
MOO