Deborah Bradley & Jeremy Irwin - Dr. Phil Interview - 3 February 2012 #2

[norest4thewicked]

My response was to this:

I worded that poorly...

 

[Whisperer]

Yes, I heard her say that - she's reading the forums and FB - she's telling us what we want to hear now. All about her. :seeya:

I told ya she reads here. My question is Does she post here?

 

[highflyer]

DB lies and she lies often. She minimizes and she exaggerates. She first stated she takes anti-anxiety meds in the morning. May or may not be true but I be it isn't true. I'm thinking she takes anti-depressants in the AM and anti-anxiety @ night.

She didn't want people to think she was depressed when this broke...so she changed up the kind of meds. I don't doublt that she has been prescribe both. I do doubt that she takes her xanax.ativan/w/e in the am and her anti-depressant at night. I wonder when she takes her mood stabilizer. Her doctor missed the boat if he didn't prescribe it.

Making up cocktails of drugs for Deborah isn't really helpful. What exactly did she say she was prescribed?

 

[Whisperer]

Couldn't be that Tacopina fabricated the secret benefactor and massive reward for ATTENTION since no proof is required that the money is available for such a reward. LOL.

Actually I have see the benefactor and Bill S tied together in an event in Texas prior to Lisa going missing.

 

[norest4thewicked]

Wow. No need to get excited. A sealed container can function the same as or better than layers of wrapping as you describe. I guess you should wait for a response from Oraih or Sarx. Good luck.

Far from excited. I just have seen this being quoted as a response and it isn't a response. It may very well be true that a sealed container is better at concealment than layers of wrapping. But I was referring to wrapping over and over as well as sealing in more than one container. It just isn't a response to that and I just felt that it was misinformation to say that it was.

 

[Whisperer]

Making up cocktails of drugs for Deborah isn't really helpful. What exactly did she say she was prescribed?

I didn't make up "Cocktails"...like your terminology there...hm.

You want me to guess? I am guessing she was prescribed anti-anxiety and anti-depressants. I heard her admit to anti-anxiety. If she didn't admit to the other, so be it. IMO, she most likely was prescribed the other one also. They often times go together when women complain about stress.

I will also add that, IMO, she has a bona fide mood disorder.

If it is not helpful, why bother asking me?

 

[Deleted member 39678]

Far from excited. I just have seen this being quoted as a response and it isn't a response. It may very well be true that a sealed container is better at concealment than layers of wrapping. But I was referring to wrapping over and over as well as sealing in more than one container. It just isn't a response to that and I just felt that it was misinformation to say that it was.

Sorry. I was just trying to help.

 

[highflyer]

bbm = I LOVED the Waltons ~ but I don't think anyone believes that people are 'that' good in this day and age. I don't think the majority of people would even think twice about their marital status. Actually in all my almost 50 years, I have never, ever seen it questioned so vehemently as I have her on WS. I know doctors and lawyers and teachers and bankers and ceos that leave one marriage and 'immediately' live with someone else. It might be unfortunate, but it has def. become the norm as opposed to the odd. Divorce can be expensive and not everyone wants to remarry. I don't think it has anything to do with status or character, it's just a new convenience.

Night John Boy ~ where ever you may be

It does speak to character to me. Will not condemn someone for it, but could not do it personally.

 

[In da Middle]

Far from excited. I just have seen this being quoted as a response and it isn't a response. It may very well be true that a sealed container is better at concealment than layers of wrapping. But I was referring to wrapping over and over as well as sealing in more than one container. It just isn't a response to that and I just felt that it was misinformation to say that it was.

I just find it hard to believe that this much handling to achieve this wouldn't have left a copious amount of evidence behind, no matter how good she tried to clean it up. The dogs should have had a frenzy over this where the 'packaging' would have occurred, I would think. That's a LOT of handling.

 

[norest4thewicked]

Sorry. I was just trying to help.

Please..you don't owe me an apology. And please don't take any of this personally. We are both here for the same purpose...to see Lisa come home. We may disagree on who is responsible, but that is to be expected in a case like this. In the beginning, I strongly felt that DB was innocent and argued for her. You and I are just simply at different points in the way we look at this. Nothing more...nothing less...:seeya:

 

[Sherbie]

Making up cocktails of drugs for Deborah isn't really helpful. What exactly did she say she was prescribed?

I've heard only one specific med mentioned. I believe Picerno told the name of the medicine in an interview segment on Fox not too long after the couple had done the interview with MK. I can't remember what the name of the medication was, though, and I'm too tired to try to find the link...so I'll state this as IMO. Maybe someone else will recall the name of the medicine.

 

[norest4thewicked]

I just find it hard to believe that this much handling to achieve this wouldn't have left a copious amount of evidence behind, no matter how good she tried to clean it up. The dogs should have had a frenzy over this where the 'packaging' would have occurred, I would think. That's a LOT of handling.

I just see it differently. I think that everything was done right there on the spot that the dog hit on. I believe that all of the scraps and pieces were put into the final box. Really, the only thing left to hit on after that would be the tape dispenser. And, we know that LE took this as evidence of something. How do we know that a dog did not hit on this dispenser? We don't know everything.

 

[francie]

They have tried to confuse us with these phones and sightings. I have to blank it out. AFAIK, her grandpa's phone should have been working. I am not going to start up this cell stuff but I doubt she could take her gpa's phone and transfer service to an account that is being red lined for non-payment. I still say that phone was working. She got the phone in case her service was shut off. Can't see DB EVER w/o a phone.

If anything was transferred it was probably her to her Dad's acct. DB lies. Has anyone noticed? :waitasec:

bbm....Deja vu! Casey babbling about her 2 phones, switching sim cards, saving numbers to sim not phone, Zanny's number lost... turns out there's no 2nd phone, hilarious when Det Allen asked if it was in her office at Universal lolol

 

[Deleted member 39678]

Please..you don't owe me an apology. And please don't take any of this personally. We are both here for the same purpose...to see Lisa come home. We may disagree on who is responsible, but that is to be expected in a case like this. In the beginning, I strongly felt that DB was innocent and argued for her. You and I are just simply at different points in the way we look at this. Nothing more...nothing less...:seeya:

Thank you. Let me say that I have no idea who is responsible for Lisa's disappearance and I've never felt that DB was innocent. Just so it's clear where I'm coming from.

 

[Dewey2Me1MoThyme]

Far from excited. I just have seen this being quoted as a response and it isn't a response. It may very well be true that a sealed container is better at concealment than layers of wrapping. But I was referring to wrapping over and over as well as sealing in more than one container. It just isn't a response to that and I just felt that it was misinformation to say that it was.

Using your theory as a jumping off point, what time do you think she must have taken the "package" out of the house in order to work with the time line, and still have time to conceal her alleged evil deeds, IF she had done this?
The reason I ask is SB sat on her front steps for an hour with Shane after DB went inside. To our knowledge, neither of the latter has said they saw DB carry anything out of the house or drive off.
How could she carry this out when SB was watching the house for an hour, yet an abducter, it is theorized by many couldn't have come or gone without being noticed.
Does anyone know if the engine temperature of the car was checked by LE?

 

[Sherbie]

Goodnight, everyone. I enjoyed the discussion today/tonight. Sweet dreams!

 

[norest4thewicked]

Using your theory as a jumping off point, what time do you think she must have taken the "package" out of the house in order to work with the time line, and still have time to conceal her alleged evil deeds, IF she had done this?
The reason I ask is SB sat on her front steps for an hour with Shane after DB went inside. To our knowledge, neither of the latter has said they saw DB carry anything out of the house or drive off.
How could she carry this out when SB was watching the house for an hour, yet an abducter, it is theorized by many couldn't have come or gone without being noticed.
Does anyone know if the engine temperature of the car was checked by LE?

Well, let's see. If people were "watching the house" for an hour, it would have had to be between 11:30 and 3:30 for her to be back home and into bed. So, that leaves 4 hours. I think that 4 hours is long enough to do every bit of that and still time to spare. Or, if she had help of some kind, that would work too. If an abductor came into the house and took Lisa with no one seeing him/her, then DB could do whatever she wanted to do and not be seen either.

 

[Dewey2Me1MoThyme]

Goodnight, everyone. I enjoyed the discussion today/tonight. Sweet dreams!

night Sherbie! :seeya:

 

[KsStormy]

What substance abuse? ( Hey Sherbie!:seeya: I knew it wouldn't take long!)

The dog people say 'yes' that any well trained dog should hit on it.

Ummm... who/what is "Sherbie" & what are you talking about? Or are you just trolling?? :innocent:

 

[Dewey2Me1MoThyme]

Well, let's see. If people were "watching the house" for an hour, it would have had to be between 11:30 and 3:30 for her to be back home and into bed. So, that leaves 4 hours. I think that 4 hours is long enough to do every bit of that and still time to spare. Or, if she had help of some kind, that would work too. If an abductor came into the house and took Lisa with no one seeing him/her, then DB could do whatever she wanted to do and not be seen either.

BBM: Thanks, that was one point many of us have been trying to make in reverse fashion, it is possible either way. If your theory is true, once the body is found it should be loaded with incriminating evidence, because as another poster mentioned, that's a lot of handling, and if the packaging can be linked back to the home that would narrow the window of suspects.