Prosecutors can't
compel anyone to testify before a grand jury without giving him or her immunity. In a grand jury, it's not just the prosecutor who can ask questions; it's also the grand jurors, so a person with guilty knowledge or who committed a crime could potentially fact questions that don't follow the tighter rules for questions in a criminal trial. In short, testifying before a grand jury is fraught with danger, unless the witness is in fact merely a witness, e.g., someone who saw the crime being committed or the suspect in a particular place or who sold the suspect a murder weapon.
Bruce MCain, formerly of the Multnomah County Sherrif's office, on the
Joy Behar Show:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1008/09/joy.01.html
And quoted in a story by KATU:
http://katu.com/news/local/100490074.htmlYes
So that's the question for those of us on the sidelines. Is Spicher so deeply implicated that LE will be reluctant to give her immunity or a plea deal (which would require a plea of guilty to something from her?) Or will they take their time, continue to develop significant aspects of the case in public, and hope to bag everyone involved in Kyron's disappearance? I say they decide that they don't need her testimony at the GJ level, they continue to develop the case until they can charge both of them, and then they cut a deal with DS for testimony at the criminal trial. (Just my opinion, of course.) And I wonder if McCain is on TV so much because LE wants him there.