Department of Children and Families Files

  • #21
I apologize if I put this up without proper research, but I did think it was very odd and needed some clarification. Thanks for the input!
 
  • #22
Let's retitle this can someone give us a good title?
 
  • #23
what's all that Ohio business?

They were searching for any prior domestic/child abuse in the family while the Anthonys lived in Ohio. Looks like they found none.
 
  • #24
Because the first time she was arrested it was for the child neglect. The child welfare people had to fill out all the forms .. It was a matter of crossing their T's and dotting the i's. The TANF is all just part of the forms that need to be filled out.. I remember discussing this earlier in the case. And i remember when the agents from the family services were called in to talk to KC. . The stuff about OHio is because thats where the A's were offically from.. So they had to check the records of family services there to make sure there was not a file of any sort on the A's.
 
  • #25
Maybe they were investigating the grandparents, if that's not it then
dunno.gif

LOL I read a little farther down and got the info. duh for me.
 
  • #26
  • #27
Is this from a new doc dump? Or, is it something you found somewhere else? Very intereting.

These docs are old. It seems they came out months ago.
 
  • #28
Is the date 17 or a messy 12? (ie, 7/12)

I believe it to be a 7. If you look lower, you can see the 2 is made with a loop on the bottom. See, hanging out at WS and now I fancy myself a handwriting expert. :floorlaugh:
 
  • #29
Is this from a new doc dump? Or, is it something you found somewhere else? Very intereting.


No this was from like the first doc dump.
 
  • #30
I believe it to be a 7. If you look lower, you can see the 2 is made with a loop on the bottom. See, hanging out at WS and now I fancy myself a handwriting expert. :floorlaugh:

If a 7, why did she pre-date it? (you may be right about it being a 7 - just trying to understand since she was in jail on 7/17.)

ETA: Ok, just read back and understand now!
 
  • #31
If a 7, why did she pre-date it? (you may be right about it being a 7 - just trying to understand since she was in jail on 7/17.)

OMG! Please, anyone change the title of this thread.
Casey didn't apply for any assistance, people will be coming here in droves!:eek:
 
  • #32
If she had applied for Benefits (TANF Food Stamps & Medicaid) on her own she would have had to cooperate with Child Support naming Caylees father. If not, she would be sanctioned. I don't think they wanted to go that route. Looks like the form is something that was done by the Children and Families caseworker.
 
  • #33
OMG! Please, anyone change the title of this thread.
Casey didn't apply for any assistance, people will be coming here in droves!:eek:

sorry! I figured it out :)
 
  • #34
  • #35
OMG! Please, anyone change the title of this thread.
Casey didn't apply for any assistance, people will be coming here in droves!:eek:

:clap::clap: I agree - nuf said. :)
 
  • #36
  • #37
  • #38
To the PP it didn't say Ohio doesn't know who the A's are. It says no record of abuse etc. in the central database. Also title change this palease..I about hurt my hand clicking my mouse to open this thread LOL.
 
  • #39
DCF documents for abuse investigation
Maybe a good thread title....
 
  • #40

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
64
Guests online
2,518
Total visitors
2,582

Forum statistics

Threads
632,910
Messages
18,633,327
Members
243,332
Latest member
Letechia
Back
Top