Did You Know That Patsy Spelled Advise Wrong In The Sample RN?

[Chrishope]

No, not the original one.

I'm sorry, that's what I get for posting at 5am.

 

[Ames]

No, not the original one.

I'm sorry, that's what I get for posting at 5am.

LOL..that's okay! I just wanted to make sure that you saw Patsy's RN Sample..and the way that she, a journalism major..spelled advise (advize).

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

PR: I need to think of a good one that'll throw LE off for sure. I've got it. I'll misspell one word, 'advise', on purpose. Its a word they don't know I can spell, so they for sure won't think I wrote the real note because of that single word I misspell.

LE: What misspelled word?

----------------------------------------

RDI sure has a problem here, because nobody ever even noticed PR misspelled the word. Now that they have, RDI appears to scramble to an explanation that PR misspelled it on purpose. Its as if RDI has instant explanations at the ready for any IDI supporting thing that pops up.

PR misspelling advise, while the RN author did not, is an IDI supporting thing, BTW.

 

[JMO8778]

Holdon,just because no one noticed it at first doesn't mean Patsy didn't do it on purpose...that is irrelevant! Patsy,particularly being journalism major,would surely know such a frequently used word;as in ..'and the president was advised to...'..by reporters and others alike.
Now if you expect us to believe that then perhaps Palin has a sister you might be interested in?????

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

Holdon,just because no one noticed it at first doesn't mean Patsy didn't do it on purpose...that is irrelevant! Patsy,particularly being journalism major,would surely know such a frequently used word;as in ..'and the president was advised to...'..by reporters and others alike.
Now if you expect us to believe that then perhaps Palin has a sister you might be interested in?????

Of course its relevant. Why would PR do something on purpose that would likely go unnoticed?

The fact that PR misspelled advise in her exemplars isn't proof she was or was not involved, so when RDI instantly, seemingly in a panic comes up with this 'she did it on purpose' explanation, it looks bad for RDI.

See what I mean? Its like RDI over-reacts.

Besides, if PR were going to dumb down her spelling, since she knows everyone knows she's a journalism major, wouldn't it make more sense for her to have misspelled it in the real RN and spelled it correctly in her exemplars? After all, she would've misspelled business, right? So you see, RDI's explanation falls short, mainly because it is so obviously hastily invented.

To put it another way, the idea that PR misspelled 'advise' on purpose appears to be a knee-jerk reaction on the part of RDI to new information that happens to favor IDI.

 

[2goldfish]

I am new to this case (I remember it happening, but no details) so started reading upon it last week on here and acandyrose - I noticed it right away. that was what swayed me into the RDI camp in the first place cause it was so obvious and ridiculous.

 

[Chrishope]

The fact that PR misspelled advise in her exemplars isn't proof she was or was not involved, so when RDI instantly, seemingly in a panic comes up with this 'she did it on purpose' explanation, it looks bad for RDI.

See what I mean? Its like RDI over-reacts.


I'm afraid I don't see what you mean. You seem to agree she wrote a practice RN. Why is she writing a practice RN if she's not involved? Or are we to believe that she accidentally spelled a simple word wrong in her practice RN, therefore she's not involved?

She's writing a practice RN for God's sake !

 

[Ames]

Of course its relevant. Why would PR do something on purpose that would likely go unnoticed?

The fact that PR misspelled advise in her exemplars isn't proof she was or was not involved, so when RDI instantly, seemingly in a panic comes up with this 'she did it on purpose' explanation, it looks bad for RDI.

See what I mean? Its like RDI over-reacts.

Besides, if PR were going to dumb down her spelling, since she knows everyone knows she's a journalism major, wouldn't it make more sense for her to have misspelled it in the real RN and spelled it correctly in her exemplars? After all, she would've misspelled business, right? So you see, RDI's explanation falls short, mainly because it is so obviously hastily invented.

To put it another way, the idea that PR misspelled 'advise' on purpose appears to be a knee-jerk reaction on the part of RDI to new information that happens to favor IDI.

She probably thought that it would NOT go unnoticed. The only reason that alot of people didn't know about it..IMO...and I speak for myself as well...is that I had never really seen her RN sample before. Its not that available over the internet...I couldn't even find it the last time I tried to look for it. Thank goodness KoldKase came through, and found a post with it, over at FFJ. Patsy kills two birds with one stone..so to speak. The RN author mispelled BUSINESS, but spelled ADVISE correctly. Patsy, mispells ADVISE, but spells BUSINESS correctly. SO GEE...she COULDN"T have written that RN. OF course she isn't going to mispell the same word as she did in the RN, so she picks another one to mispell in her sample...it just so happens that it is a FOURTH GRADE spelling word (look it up), and she is a JOURNALISM MAJOR. That...IMO...should cause a bell in your head to go ding, ding, ding.

 

[Ames]

Holdon,just because no one noticed it at first doesn't mean Patsy didn't do it on purpose...that is irrelevant! Patsy,particularly being journalism major,would surely know such a frequently used word;as in ..'and the president was advised to...'..by reporters and others alike.
Now if you expect us to believe that then perhaps Palin has a sister you might be interested in?????

EXACTLY! The RN handwriting sample of Patsy's...cannot even be found on the internet anymore. It was not readily available to begin with. There was only ONE site with it. I didn't know about it earlier, because I had never SEEN her RN sample before, until a few months ago. That doesn't mean...like you said..that she didn't do it on purpose. It just means that since it wasn't highly available on the internet..that alot of people didn't see it. Patsy probably had no idea that the experts would have missed that, anyway. And...maybe they DID notice it. We don't know what they missed and what they didn't. THEY are the experts, not us.

 

[Ames]

I am new to this case (I remember it happening, but no details) so started reading upon it last week on here and acandyrose - I noticed it right away. that was what swayed me into the RDI camp in the first place cause it was so obvious and ridiculous.

HI There...WELCOME TO THE JBR BOARD!!!!!

I have to say...I LOVE your signature...about Casey Anthony....man, that girl can LIE, can't she? And the reason that you had to edit your post.....too funny! I have a 10 1/2 month old...so, I feel your pain. LOL

 

[Ames]

The fact that PR misspelled advise in her exemplars isn't proof she was or was not involved, so when RDI instantly, seemingly in a panic comes up with this 'she did it on purpose' explanation, it looks bad for RDI.

See what I mean? Its like RDI over-reacts.


I'm afraid I don't see what you mean. You seem to agree she wrote a practice RN. Why is she writing a practice RN if she's not involved? Or are we to believe that she accidentally spelled a simple word wrong in her practice RN, therefore she's not involved?

She's writing a practice RN for God's sake !

Well, yeah...kind of. There was a practice note found in the trash and it said..."Mr and Mrs. Ramsey"......she admitted to writing it, but said that it was going to be a practice invitation for a party. "Mr. and Mrs. Ramsey would like to invite you......", you know, that sort of thing. But, it was the Ransom note SAMPLE that she wrote for the handwriting experts that were trying to get comparison writings from her, that she wrote the word advize, instead of advise.

 

[BBB167893]

Holdon,just because no one noticed it at first doesn't mean Patsy didn't do it on purpose...that is irrelevant!

Sure. Sometimes I don't see things in a movie (an appropriate comparison, in my view) until the fifth or sixth viewing.

 

[BBB167893]

Of course its relevant. Why would PR do something on purpose that would likely go unnoticed

As I have often pointed out Holdon, she had no experience to know what would or would not go unnoticed.

The fact that PR misspelled advise in her exemplars isn't proof she was or was not involved, so when RDI instantly, seemingly in a panic comes up with this 'she did it on purpose' explanation, it looks bad for RDI.

Like you say: doesn't really faze me in the grand scheme.

 

[KoldKase]

PR misspelling advise, while the RN author did not, is an IDI supporting thing, BTW.

So what is Patsy writing "two gentlemen" in her extemporaneous writing sample, referring to the men sitting at the table "watching her" write, when the ransom note writer wrote "two gentlemen are watching over" JonBenet, as well?

 

[azwriter]

EXACTLY! The RN handwriting sample of Patsy's...cannot even be found on the internet anymore. It was not readily available to begin with. There was only ONE site with it. I didn't know about it earlier, because I had never SEEN her RN sample before, until a few months ago. That doesn't mean...like you said..that she didn't do it on purpose. It just means that since it wasn't highly available on the internet..that alot of people didn't see it. Patsy probably had no idea that the experts would have missed that, anyway. And...maybe they DID notice it. We don't know what they missed and what they didn't. THEY are the experts, not us.

Patsy also pulled "It wasn't me" trick when she wore the same clothing outfit two days in a row, when it was noted that she was wearing the same clothes the day after Christmas that she wore the night before. It was as if she said "See, it's perfectly normal for me to wear the same outfit two days in a row." That example was noticed by the detectives.

 

[DeeDee249]

So what is Patsy writing "two gentlemen" in her extemporaneous writing sample, referring to the men sitting at the table "watching her" write, when the ransom note writer wrote "two gentlemen are watching over" JonBenet, as well?

Good catch! That is something I hadn't thought about till I saw your post.

On the spelling "errors"...I wonder how many journalism majors misspell "Bussiness". Not many, I bet.

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

She probably thought that it would NOT go unnoticed. The only reason that alot of people didn't know about it..IMO...and I speak for myself as well...is that I had never really seen her RN sample before. Its not that available over the internet...I couldn't even find it the last time I tried to look for it. Thank goodness KoldKase came through, and found a post with it, over at FFJ. Patsy kills two birds with one stone..so to speak. The RN author mispelled BUSINESS, but spelled ADVISE correctly. Patsy, mispells ADVISE, but spells BUSINESS correctly. SO GEE...she COULDN"T have written that RN. OF course she isn't going to mispell the same word as she did in the RN, so she picks another one to mispell in her sample...it just so happens that it is a FOURTH GRADE spelling word (look it up), and she is a JOURNALISM MAJOR. That...IMO...should cause a bell in your head to go ding, ding, ding.

I couldn't have said it better myself. You're right, she COULDN'T have written the RN.

I've decided it could be even better, even more exhonerating, than DNA evidence. There is DNA at the crime scene but you don't KNOW who it belongs to. You KNOW one of JBR's attackers wrote the RN, and you KNOW PR wrote the exemplars. Yet they appear to be written by authors with two different spelling abilities. Thats why different words are misspelled in each one. It would've looked really bad for PR if advise was advize and business was bussiness in both the RN and the exemplars. See what I mean?

Of course RDI has to INVENT a completely FICTIONAL claim that she misspelled on purpose. It really looks like fiction because the claim comes so quickly, with such an ardent belief that this is the case, regardless of whether or not there's any corroboration.

 

[Ames]

I couldn't have said it better myself. You're right, she COULDN'T have written the RN.

I've decided it could be even better, even more exhonerating, than DNA evidence. There is DNA at the crime scene but you don't KNOW who it belongs to. You KNOW one of JBR's attackers wrote the RN, and you KNOW PR wrote the exemplars. Yet they appear to be written by authors with two different spelling abilities. Thats why different words are misspelled in each one. It would've looked really bad for PR if advise was advize and business was bussiness in both the RN and the exemplars. See what I mean?

Of course RDI has to INVENT a completely FICTIONAL claim that she misspelled on purpose. It really looks like fiction because the claim comes so quickly, with such an ardent belief that this is the case, regardless of whethor or not there's any corroboration.

I said that because that is what she wanted people to think...not that I believe it. Of course..you knew that already.

 

[JMO8778]

Of course its relevant. Why would PR do something on purpose that would likely go unnoticed?

what do you mean likely? Patsy would be more *likely assume that if she misspelled a word,it WOULD get noticed!

The fact that PR misspelled advise in her exemplars isn't proof she was or was not involved, so when RDI instantly, seemingly in a panic comes up with this 'she did it on purpose' explanation, it looks bad for RDI.

hardly.YOU are the one who came here and pronounced that Patsy couldn't have possibly written the RN....all because she misspelled ONE word! It's totally the opposite of what you say.

See what I mean? Its like RDI over-reacts.

Um,nope.again,you're the one who brought it up to begin with.you're the one who proclaimed she couldn't have possibly written it,all based on that one word!

Besides, if PR were going to dumb down her spelling, since she knows everyone knows she's a journalism major, wouldn't it make more sense for her to have misspelled it in the real RN (she had misspellings in the RN) and spelled it correctly in her exemplars? (she corrected them in the exemplars).you are trying to say Patsy did the opposite,but truth is,although different words...she did the exact same thing!! After all, she would've misspelled business, right? So you see, RDI's explanation falls short, mainly because it is so obviously hastily invented.

..and in all fairness,the RN was hastily invented!! It's not like they had to time to attend Ransom Notes 101: How NOT to Write One,before writing it!

and,although different words,she did misspell at the beginning of the real RN...but she didn't in the rest of it..in her haste,she forgot to be congruent,(IMO).
wouldn't it be better to ask how an intruder could suddenly learn to spell so quickly,even a word such as attache??

To put it another way, the idea that PR misspelled 'advise' on purpose appears to be a knee-jerk reaction on the part of RDI to new information that happens to favor IDI.

again,YOU are the one who brought this issue here and proclaimed Patsy innocent,based on ONE word!!

 

[JMO8778]

Good catch! That is something I hadn't thought about till I saw your post.

On the spelling "errors"...I wonder how many journalism majors misspell "Bussiness". Not many, I bet.

I wonder how many of them murder their daughters an write fake ransom notes as well??
BTW..NOTES,or any type of writing..whether it be graffiti,or writing on a wall at the scene of a murder,etc...is NOT that uncommon! watch a few true crime shows and see what I mean...it is frequently done in an attempt to point to someone else!! It's really NOT all that uncommon!