oceanblueeyes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 26,446
- Reaction score
- 43,739
I would think that falling over a second floor banister and smashing into a huge chandelier would cause extensive injuries.
With the use of the word brutal you seem to imply that the injuries were caused by brute strength. That would exonerate Rebecca and her sister in my opinion since they were very tiny women with no histories of mental illness or violence.
I dont even see how Max could even prepell himself out that far to even bring down the chandelier.
In the report does it say how far out the chandelier hung from the railing?
I would think shards of glass from the chandelier would make very distinctive patterns that would be easy to recognize both by the doctors who treated him and the experts Dina hired. There was a reason why the doctors at the hospital immediately were suspicious this wasnt an accident.
Something just isnt right. The drawing never made any sense to me from day one when police showed it.
What does being a tiny woman have to do with anything? She was certainly far bigger than a small 6 year old. Just because no one has a history of violence never means they will always be non-violent. We see that for ourselves in many cases right here where the defendant had no violent criminal history whatsoever.
IMO