Trotterly, now you are rubbishing claims that Reeva could possibly have screamed after the first shot to the hip because it doesn't fit with your OP is "innocent" belief?
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/23/oscar-pistorius-trial-murdered-reeva-steenkamp
Screaming would have been an
involuntary act after being shot in the hip. It would have been abnormal
not to scream out at the pain. But you've decided (because OP is innocent) that it didn't happen... despite reports to the contrary?? Hmm. The second shot
missed, which gave Reeva time to register the pain before being blasted to death by her killer. Yet you still don't want to believe Reeva could have screamed out in pain, because it doesn't fit your theory. You seem to be altering evidence to back up your own beliefs.