Ok, discount the dogs.
Why would the McCanns say the "intruder" had
jemmyed the shutter from outside, but the police and Mark Warner staff say that there was no damage to the shutters?
Jemmied was the word apparently used by Gerry Mccanns sister in an interview with the papers. In his original statement and Kate's original statement they both said the door was unlocked but closed, window was open and the shutters raised. This information has never changed. Amy Tierney (an employee) also mentioned the window and shutters in her statement.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATE-MCCANN.htm
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN.htm
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-ARGUIDO.htm#p10p2567
http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post27240.html?sid=ede9369313747bca96fbdd49859c3584#p27240
Why would they say the window, shutters and curtains all wide open,
but the only finger prints on the sill were Kate's?
Please read following info regarding fingerprints on the window sill. Please also note that only the inside of the window was tested.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/FINGERPRINTS.htm#p4p967
Kate refusing to answer any of the 48 questions, and both parents refusing a lie detector? If they have nothing to hide why not prove your innocence then the police can explore other avenues.
Lie detector tests are pretty much considered junk science here in the UK. Kate had previously answered questions, noticed a change in tone and then took her right to remain silent. This is not an indication of guilt.
Jeremy Wilkins evidence of meeting Gerry and speaking to him differing significantly from Gerry's account?
How do they differ significantly?
None of the tapas 9 searching for Madeleine that night. And Jane Tanner withholding the sighting of the man carrying Madeleine? That's key evidence!
This is not true they did search it is all there in the statements of the tapas 9, staff and police. Jane Tanner did not withhold the sighting from the police. She told them straight away she did not tell Kate because she did not want to worry her.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JANE_TANNER_RIGATORY.htm
Bringing lawyers in from England within 48 hours?
Why is this so suspicious?
Being in contact with the Prime minister of England within weeks. How many British citizens go missing every year. They have to deal with the consulate, they don't talk personally to the prime minister!
Kate washing cuddle cat! This was supposed to be Madeleine's favourite toy that she slept with, why would Kate wash the scent of her missing daughter from the toy. Other parents keep things for years, even decades to keep a link to their children. Was Kate washing DNA evidence off the toy?
She washed it 70 days after Madeleine went missing so no DNA evidence would likely be left. She wasn't exactly hiding it from people.
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id166.html
And then there are the Smiths from Ireland who as soon as they saw Getty walking and holding his son knew, 100% knew, that the man they had seen carrying Madeleine was Getty. We all walk differently, we all carry children differently. Why would they be framing Gerry, why wait until seeing him get off a plane and walk carrying his child? Surely if they want to frame them they would say straight away that Gerry was the man carrying Madeleine, and not wait all that time? It was because they recognised Gerry's walking style and child carrying style and it shocked them.