Does Anyone here think Casey Anthony is innocent?

[CharlestonGal]

If information comes out that completely exonerates kc (not just doubt) I will shave my head.

I think your hair is safe. Any information that exonerates Casey would have come out long before now. No one sits in jail silently for 7 months saying nothing if there is information that can exonerate them. They'd scream it from the rooftops.

 

[RR0004]

Things don't look so good, but there are actually quite a few unknowns. It wouldn't be the first time that a case took a twist. Personally, I would rather find out she is innocent.

I'm mostly curious to know how you all would feel if she WAS found innocent...if in some way she actually DID turn out to be another victim in this case?

Another thread?

 

[angeleleven]

if information comes out that completely exonerates kc (not just doubt) i will shave my head.

me too!

 

[gibby207]

Interested57: Casey is guilty, hun. I respect your gut feelings but mine are she's guilty. And my feelings are backed by a boatload of evidence.

The reason the defense hasn't brought forth anything is because they are scrambling for something, anything, to grasp onto.

Maybe you should read into the documents and watch the videos in a different light to see why so many others feel the same as I do.

 

[Foxxtrot]

you are applying logic to the same individual who is accused of killing her child. If a person does something as illogical as killing her child, would she be more logical when she hid the body? If you say she is too smart to hide the body near her home, wouldn't she be smart enough not to do most of the things she has done?

I don't have time to go back and read my posts BUT I don't believe I said or insinuated Casey was too smart to hid the body near her home. I believe I said to hide the body 10 miles from home would be more logical than to hide the body within 2, 3 or 4 blocks from home.

 

[sadyjade]

Things don't look so good, but there are actually quite a few unknowns. It wouldn't be the first time that a case took a twist. Personally, I would rather find out she is innocent.

I'm mostly curious to know how you all would feel if she WAS found innocent...if in some way she actually DID turn out to be another victim in this case?

I don't think my feelings towards KC would much change if I were to find out she was given a not guilty verdict. I would however, always wonder what happened to Caylee ... but I don't think anyone will ever be told the truth.

As for being *another* victim ... well, she is a grown woman with no tangeable physical, or mental disabilities, a victim of what? She didn't seem to be *victimized* to me ... but I am certain she feels victimized.

Caylee is gone, and nothing will change that. She is the only victim I can see clearly in this case, and I want justice for her.

 

[HRCODEPINK]

Well, there was no phone call on July 15th around noon from Caylee or anyone else. So, "the Nanny" wasn't tricking KC with a video voice of the baby. KC just lied. Plain and simple.

Not to mention that no where in that video have I ever heard Caylee say "Hi Mommy!" like she claimed Caylee said in the interview with LE

 

[Interested57]

This has become a pretty long thread of which I haven't been able to read all the responses yet.

I will say that some of you have posted questions to my posts that I don't have answers to. The whole point of the thread.

I want to know how KC who had been a "great" mother by all accounts of just about everyone who was interviewed, flipped the switch. How do you go from the loving mother to a monster. Was it always lurking underneath it all? I don't believe the argument with her mother set it off. I don't believe she was jealous of her mother so she killed her child. I don't believe it. JMO

 

[anastacia129]

I don't have time to go back and read my posts BUT I don't believe I said or insinuated Casey was too smart to hid the body near her home. I believe I said to hide the body 10 miles from home would be more logical than to hide the body within 2, 3 or 4 blocks from home.

sorry, I guess I assumed that was part of the reasoning behind your thoughts on kc innocence.

 

[Foxxtrot]

He might want to reign in his spokesperson (?) as well 'cause it isn't helping his case one bit.

I know. That mess is getting so bad. Ever since the day TB had his slip of the tongue that Caylee is dead it has went down hill from there.

 

[robotdog]

This has become a pretty long thread of which I haven't been able to read all the responses yet.

I will say that some of you have posted questions to my posts that I don't have answers to. The whole point of the thread.

I want to know how KC who had been a "great" mother by all accounts of just about everyone who was interviewed, flipped the switch. How do you go from the loving mother to a monster. Was it always lurking underneath it all? I don't believe the argument with her mother set it off. I don't believe she was jealous of her mother so she killed her child. I don't believe it. JMO

my hunch is she was a rotten mother EXCEPT when she had to play the part of a good mother in front of people

she is dumber than a box of bricks
she is good at lies all different kinds of them whether they are verbal lies
or lies of "acting"

i hate her,

and i have every right to - she is a killer

 

[capps]

Whether she's innocent or guilty, she's going down for this. Frankly, that is nobody's doing but hers. If this was an accident, or if someone else did it, Casey has a responsibility to say so. Her silence on the whole matter from day 1 (not day 31) will be her undoing.

As for wracking my brains and twisting myself into a pretzel to figure out a way Casey could possibly be innocent or that Caylee's death was an accident, that's not my job. It's CASEY'S responsibility to explain what happened to a child under HER care, it's not my responsibility to figure out a defense for her. She hasn't lifted a finger to explain any of it and if that results in LWOP for her, that's on her.

Good post CharlestonGal.

 

[KAITLAND]

I disagree with this. I have not read of any cases where a baby was killed for gang retribution. I'm not saying there has never been one, but if so, it's rare. casey simply does not seem the type to me to be involved in scary gang/drug activity. She was a petty thief before the murder. That's about all. I don't fall for the defense conspiracy theories for a moment. casey may like the idea that she could be thought of to be a part of a scary underground, but, look at her, her friends, her background. Please! She was just an average person from an average dysfunctional family. I'll never believe that she some scary gangster.

My sentiments also. Remember there was that case recently (Texas? California?) where the grandfather was involved with drug dealers, and his grandson was kidnapped in broad daylight. They put out bulletins on NATIONAL TV! No one hid it, and the police and FBI got involved - it scared the drug dealers and they dropped the child off on the street. No one involved was keeping it a secret, or making up any imaginary nanny. I don't think there is a responsible mother alive who would wait for 31 days to call the police/FBI.

 

[ecs5298]

Ever since the day TB had his slip of the tongue that Caylee is dead it has went down hill from there.

I would classify that as a little bit more than a "slip of the tongue" considering that hadn't even found her remains and the A's and the defense were still claiming she was alive.

Hmmm....it almost seems like TB had some inside information. He probably got it from the same place that PI's DC & JH got it from. There seemed to be a lot of that "foot in mouth" disease going on at that time.

JMHO as always.

 

[costalpilot]

I don't have time to go back and read my posts BUT I don't believe I said or insinuated Casey was too smart to hid the body near her home. I believe I said to hide the body 10 miles from home would be more logical than to hide the body within 2, 3 or 4 blocks from home.

thats not much of a distinction: did I say she was smart or logical, not so smart or illogical when she threw her baby in the weeds?

what the hay, if she didn't do it, then (according to her)someone ,who doesn't exist (according to the cops) did, and they must have taken the body in their car that doesn't exist over to her neighborhood in order to make her look guilty.

makes sense. I'm sure a kidnapper would try and frame a parent. Happens all the time, doesn't it.

Anybody EVER heard of such an outlandish scenario, other than a Defense atty?

 

[ecs5298]

Anybody EVER heard of such an outlandish scenario, other than a Defense atty?

I'm sure OJ and Scott Peterson would find that scenario believable.

 

[Bickeny]

I don't have time to go back and read my posts BUT I don't believe I said or insinuated Casey was too smart to hid the body near her home. I believe I said to hide the body 10 miles from home would be more logical than to hide the body within 2, 3 or 4 blocks from home.

IIRC the study that someone quoted earlier said within 10 miles. So most mothers who kill their children will dispose of their children will dispose of them anywhere within 10 miles of their home. Fifteen houses away falls within that 10 miles.

The rest of those statistics were spot on, almost frighteningly so!

 

[lin]

Then I guess they are all one in the same!

Naaaah. Have to disagree there. Some have a history of that type of influence at least being suspected; others don't seem to have much of a public history at all.

 

[HRCODEPINK]

Casey is innocent until proven guilty. Until she is found guilty, I think she is innocent.

Presumed innocent. We all know that there are times here and there that the jury does get it wrong. That is why we have an innocence project. No matter how the jury votes, and if Baez is able to find that one dream juror, it will not change the truth of who really killed Caylee. But I admire your ability to stick with that stance, regardless of whether you would be on the jury or not. :blowkiss:

 

[Shalya]

If information comes out that completely exonerates kc (not just doubt) I will shave my head.

I'll jump on this bandwagon too.
I haven't had short hair in twenty-four years. Shaving my head would be insane. I'm pretty sure my locks are safe though.
:blowkiss: