- Joined
- Oct 29, 2012
- Messages
- 7,794
- Reaction score
- 38,646
I thought that as well BUT they have hard core evidence in this case. Mark and his stupid minions have just been playing the legal game.After so many years, I wonder how many potential jurors with prior case knowledge, remember as much as those of us who have followed this case from day one?
I have to admit my memory isn’t as fresh as it was several years ago. However, if an instance is brought up, I bet I can fill in the pieces or immediately recognize an incorrect description.
The lawyers may try so hard to get people who have such little knowledge of this case, that the people aren’t the brightest to be sitting on a murder trial. Let’s hope this is not the case or a repeat of CA or OJ’s trials!