BBM above.
Some say MR's 'failure' to say something to the effect- 'I want to find the person responsible for Dylan's death'
is evidence of MR's involvement in Dylan's death.
The thing is -- we don't know what was edited out from that interview
For all I know, MR said that exact thing, multiple times during that interview,
but the reporter or producer chose to use the above sound bite in the broadcast segment.
Parent saying - I want to find the person responsible for killing my child =
less newsworthy /less quotable than
parent saying - I think x or y is what led to my child's death.
"MR did not say it" (want to find child's killer)?
or
MR said it, but it was edited out by reporter or producer.
-----------------------------------------------
My point is about flawed reasoning process in cases generally, from one interview--
concluding that parent's failure to express this desire = evidence of involvement.
In this case, MR has been interviewed by broadcast & print MSM many times.
Many posters here say MR has not expressed this desire in any interview.
Last night I watched both Dr. P. Feb. shows, and if MR said it there -
in a long interview, where he had time to express it, I missed it.
MR's responses re taking polygraph exam speaks volumes to me.