I would like to add that the only people who contracted Ebola from the dude in Texas who got it in Liberia, were our own, American healthcare workers. Not the tons of people he came in contact with outside of the hospital.
I would like to add that the only people who contracted Ebola from the dude in Texas who got it in Liberia, were our own, American healthcare workers. Not the tons of people he came in contact with outside of the hospital.
Of 700 Doctors Without Borders health care professionals sent to Africa to treat Ebola patients there, only three (3)- THREE - contracted it. Not died, just contracted it. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/07/31/world/africa/ebola-virus-outbreak-qa.html
How many health care workers treated the dude in Texas? Not cclose to 700, right? And how many contracted it?
Hmm. I kind of think our system is far poorer than whatever they are doing there.
The CDC does NOT recommend quarantine for health care workers returning from Africa. http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0IG12920141027?irpc=932
Of 700 Doctors Without Borders health care professionals sent to Africa to treat Ebola patients there, only three (3)- THREE - contracted it. Not died, just contracted it. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/07/31/world/africa/ebola-virus-outbreak-qa.html
How many health care workers treated the dude in Texas? Not cclose to 700, right? And how many contracted it?
Hmm. I kind of think our system is far poorer than whatever they are doing there.
The CDC does NOT recommend quarantine for health care workers returning from Africa. http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0IG12920141027?irpc=932
Who were those "tons" of people from outside the hospital? His family quarantined themselves against him. The only one I know for sure is the homeless guy.
Excellent question. The lack of logic in quarantining one nurse but not other medical professionals here is based, I think, on the same cultural attitudes that have created hysteria about a disease that can only be acquired via bodily fluids. Like hepatitis. Or AIDS.
The number of health care professionals heavily involved in treating Ebola in Africa is large. Compared with how many of them who have contracted the disease there proves, I think, that the protocols our health care workers here use to prevent transmission are not better than those employed by workers there. So that's not an excuse for the hypocrisy regarding quarantine.
Doctors without borders said 16 of their staff contracted it and 9 died. Not counting doctor Spencer. As for TX hospital, they send over 50 people to treat Duncan.
According to the WHO:
"The outbreak of Ebola virus disease in west Africa is unprecedented in many ways, including the high proportion of doctors, nurses, and other health care workers who have been infected.
To date, more than 240 health care workers have developed the disease in Guinea, Liberia, Nigeria, and Sierra Leone, and more than 120 have died."
"Several factors help explain the high proportion of infected medical staff. These factors include shortages of personal protective equipment or its improper use, far too few medical staff for such a large outbreak, and the compassion that causes medical staff to work in isolation wards far beyond the number of hours recommended as safe."
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/ebola/25-august-2014/en/
In the United States, patient 0 presented at a regional hospital unexpectedly. He was treated and tragically died. Two of more then 50 care givers did become infected, but both were treated and lived. Considering that is the first case of a previously unknown disease diagnosed in this country, I personally don't think that is too bad. It is unfortunate that Mr Duncan died, but we have no way of knowing what his health and health care were prior to arriving in the US. He may well have had pre-existing issues that compromised his ability to survive Ebola. The overall survival,rate for,the disease was already not in his favor.
Without doing some research, I don't know how accurate the Doctors Without Borders provided numbers you quoted are. I do not believe that they have sent 700 front line medical professionals to treat patients in Guinea, Liberia, Nigeria, and Sierra Leone. They have a strong presence, but organizations like the WHO and Samaritan's purse are (I believe) bigger contributors. Doctors Without Borders is a good organization, But they are very admin heavy.
Indeed. It's OK to be wrong, especially if you're seeking truth, admit limitations, and adapt to the facts. But that's not what has been happening since day one.Why would anyone care what the CDC says when they have been so wrong on everything about this?
And as of last week, their website said there were 23 of them infected, with 7 survivors.Doctors without borders said 16 of their staff contracted it and 9 died. Not counting doctor Spencer. As for TX hospital, they send over 50 people to treat Duncan.
Without doing some research, I don't know how accurate the Doctors Without Borders provided numbers you quoted are. I do not believe that they have sent 700 front line medical professionals to treat patients in Guinea, Liberia, Nigeria, and Sierra Leone. They have a strong presence, but organizations like the WHO and Samaritan's purse are (I believe) bigger contributors. Doctors Without Borders is a good organization, But they are very admin heavy.
The health care workers in the US are taking care of one patient at a time, under optimal sanitary conditions. They are being monitored closely for symptoms but they are not considered at the highest level of risk. (Even so, the 2 nurses in Texas did become infected.)
Health care workers in the 3 badly impacted countries are dealing with many patients at a time, they are working in overcrowded "hospital" settings (that we in the US would not accept as hospitals), they are working extremely long hours and they are living and traveling through areas where many people,in the community are infected. They are at extremely high risk of infection. To date, none of the Americans who contracted Ebola and were brought to the US for treatment could pinpoint exactly where they got it.
Quarantine seems wise for people at extremely high risk of an infectious disease. Just my opinion.
How many of the 240 that you cited or from doctors without Borders? According to their statements, only three. Are you aware how many healthcare professionals from poor Third World countries are currently treating Ebola victims?
It was reported on CNN tv that the U.S. can expect up to 3-8 more cases MONTHLY of Ebola.
To be fair, Christie's "version of the truth" on this matter has been laden with spin galore (to put it kindly), as well.* So I'm not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt either.
* His claim was that she was only quarantined "because she had symptoms" and yet those "symptoms" were based on an admittedly-flawed "temp from a distance" device which wasn't supported by an actual temp check. Then she tested negative TWICE. Yet, she was still being detained and as late as Sunday he was saying they'd continue to keep her.
And that is why she(imo) should never be trusted by anyone for anything ever again. I am so glad her face has been plastered all over so people know what she looks like. jmo idk
And that is why she(imo) should never be trusted by anyone for anything ever again. I am so glad her face has been plastered all over so people know what she looks like. jmo idk
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.