kimlynn
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2012
- Messages
- 2,086
- Reaction score
- 2,683
This reminds me of what we see during criminal trials. Take Casey Anthony's mother, for example. She went to the media, Nancy Grace first, and got her story out there to gain public support. In other trials, we see a deep distrust of the judicial system. In this case we see both a deep distrust of either the medical community or this hospital, and we see that the story was taken to the media to gain public support. The problem is that the more we hear, the more we realize that the story that was first presented was not exactly the whole story. That's what we saw in the Anthony case as well. Time unfolded more information that, if known at the outset, would have resulted in the story being a non-story. Did the Anthonys set up a fund early on, or did they confine their fund raising to the sale of photos?
Maybe it was the story as they understood it or from their perspective? I'm not saying I agree with going public,but perhaps they feared that the hospital would act in haste and they wanted it to be known as a form of protection.
I can't judge this family because whatever the end result,it is surely life altering for all concerned.
I think with time and a moving away from this facility they will understand that there is no hope for any improvement.
IMO