I think her point is that it usually ends within weeks.
But I suppose that people who are not brain dead would not last too long without nutrition either so that is a confounding factor in determining the survival prognosis.
Shewmon's abstract said that the braindead who had a primary brain injury tended to survive longer than the ones who had more systemic ailments which I guess makes perfect sense.
The hospital benefits if she dies. If she continues to exist, they cost for them will be far greater. On comparison the payout for a dead child is far less than the cost of maintaining her long term.
If everyone is so damn sure she'll succumb in mere weeks... Ask yourself, why not let nature takes it course?
Everyone seems so concerned the families motive is money. The money won in any lawsuit would be placed in a special needs trust for the child. The family would get very little in comparison.
If she dies, the family would get all of any lawsuit money.
The only one benefitting from her death is those fighting so hard for it. I have to say. The hospital is the one with motive.... If anyone motives are shady...it's theirs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk