After reading all the court documents and the article by Mr. Dolan, I personally have a better understanding of the legal arguments being presented. If Jahi's blood pressure and heart rate are dropping precipitously, it does not sound as though her cardiac condition is stable.
If I understand the judge's ruling correctly, CHO is to maintain the "status quo" so to speak. So if Jahi's condition deteriorates, CHO is not required to perform "life saving measures". So the DNR status is moot? Did I understand this correctly? TIA.
Since CHO is considering her legally dead, and the judge did agree she was brain dead, then how could they possibly be required to perform "life saving" measures?