- Joined
- Jan 17, 2004
- Messages
- 42,893
- Reaction score
- 126,777
Issued a death certificate more promptly, asserted its responsibilities when the hospital was stating that they couldn't release Jahi to another facility without consent from the coroner's office (after which there was silence from that office while several appeals were filed until the certificate was FINALLY issued a few days ago whereupon CHO was able to agree to release Jahi's remains) and made it clear to the family and the media that under the laws of California Jahi has been dead since 12/12/13.
The question of Jahi's death after multiple confirmations should never have been CHO's battle to fight, IMO.
Thanks. This is such a sick, twisted situation. Why this family would want to hang onto the body of their dead child is mind boggling. I'm thinking back to what happened with my father. I was in Europe when he passed away, but he died at home. He was Buddhist, so first someone came to the home to perform the end of life rituals. Then the funeral home brought the casket to the house and he was laid in the casket. He was at home for three days, then the funeral home came to collect the casket, and there was a graveside funeral. There was no autopsy or embalming.
I can understand that the body could be released to the family for a specified amount of time, but there must be a time limit on that. It's simply not normal for people to keep their deceased relatives at home and I can't imagine that the coroner would authorize the family to simply keep the body for as long as they want. There are serious health issues associated with not burying or cremating a body.