Also this is the caption of undated pix in K_Z's linked article, pub 02/09 just above:
"Rev. Dr. Harold R. Mayberry and other clergy members addressed the press about
complaints alleging Children's Hospital insensitive to the family of Jahi McMath."
And from article, as BBM and SBM:
"Oakland clergy are still demanding answers from Children’s Hospital Oakland
in regards to the way they handled the case of Jahi McMath."
"...“The hospital’s attempt to dilute our righteous concerns..." and
"Because the hospital is an important institution in the community, he said, the goal of the meeting
“was to attempt to bring healing to what has been a very painful situation for the community.”
said Rev M.
It puzzles me that Rev M still wants,
ostensibly on behalf of Jahi's fam,
to intercede w hosp about its alleged insensitivity to fam.
Since late Dec, Jahi's mom has had
legal counsel of her choice, filed a lawsuit
(re transfer and other petitions re other issues) to rep her interests.
IIRC, Rev M does not claim to be a pastor to Jahi, her mom, or any fam.
What the heck can Rev M or any other self-appted person do to rep Jahi or Jah's mom, esp now?
How about Rev M attempting to
'bring healing' to Jahi's fam, who does not seem to have
pastor or faith influences to help them
ack. her death?
Just because Rev M's church and CHO in the
same city,
does that somehow entitle Rev M to demand HIPAA-protected info re Jahi?
Why is Rev M making the kind of stmts that could reasonably be expected, if say, multiple
hosp employees
all known to be suffering from
bubonic plague, typhoid, malaria, yellow fever, German measles, and tuberculosis were
working there day in and day out and
spreading diseases to ppl in the community.
Then Rev M's asking questions of CHO re public health concerns would seem reasonable, imo.
JM2cts and I could be wrong. :seeya:
