From my earlier post:
On other part of same post, I'm not followinglogic on the this:
".... If she's in a hospital ICU being run by theCatholic church, I think there is a good possibility those tests weren'taccurate...."
I can't help you see the logic in my post. The link is pretty self-explanatory....
JMO
. SBM
MyBelle,
Thanks very much for your response which helps me follow your rationale.
Essentially you're saying the
NJ hosp docs & administrators think (believe?) it's possible the earlier tests were
not accurate.
Lets say hypothetically, one poorly trained, inexperienced GP in a 25 bed gen hosp in Smalltown USA declared her braindead
(apologies to any med professional, as I have no idea what tests such a hypothetical doc would perform to reach that conclusion).
If she had been declared braindead by
one doc, it would be easier to understand NJ docs & admins thinking -
there's a
good possibility those tests weren't accurate, so we'll admit Jahi to our hosp.
Given all the tests performed by Oakland hosp's multiple highly trained & experienced specialist MDs, over a period of weeks,
is it possible the NJ docs & admins thought -
there's a
one in a million possibility those tests weren't accurate? Or one in a trillion? Maybe one in a hundred? or one in ten? IDK.
And I recognize some would think that is a basis for admitting Jahi to the NJ hosp.
Again, thanks for explaining.