margarita25
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2012
- Messages
- 51,429
- Reaction score
- 207,289
What floor did the boy who survived live on? Tia.
Last edited:
I don't think high rises are the problem. They have to be engineered and constructed properly, and also demolished when they surpass their life expectancy. Routine inspections and timely repairs are part of that equation as well.I agree that it is not the smartest thing to be building high density accommodation on oceanfront properties. And so much of it. It is far different from building little beach shacks in those locations.
IMO we need to have more respect for the land and its capabilities - of supporting great weight, of erosion, of tidal effects.
Build the highrises further back from the beaches, they will still be able to see the ocean. And allow smaller, lighter, easier-on-the-land construction closer to the shoreline.
I wouldn't call that an addition, it happened during the original construction and was accounted for in the engineering.See post #538 about the addition.
See post #538 about the addition.
SURFSIDE, Fla.—The developers of the collapsed Surfside condominium tower worked around local building codes by adding a penthouse that wasn’t part of the original plan, a review of town building records shows.
Plans submitted by the developer of the Champlain Towers South initially called for 12 floors of residential units. The developer decided to add a penthouse, which increased the building’s height by 15 feet with an additional floor. That put the tower slightly above the town’s legal height ordinance at the time.
The property owners built the penthouse after the Surfside town commission granted a special exemption to local height limits, according to a 1981 article in the Miami Herald. That allowed for these rooftop apartments at Champlain Towers South and a little later at Champlain Towers North, which was built around the same time.
It isn’t clear if the addition of a penthouse put undue stress on the south tower, though any possible irregularity related to the building is receiving new attention from local authorities and engineers after its sudden collapse.
Miami-Area Condo That Collapsed Skirted Local Codes With Penthouse
IDK. His mom was found deceased though.What floor did the boy survived live on? Tia.
I don't think high rises are the problem. They have to be engineered and constructed properly, and also demolished when they surpass their life expectancy. Routine inspections and timely repairs are part of that equation as well.
It sounds like there were multiple failures in engineering, construction and maintenance in this building. JMO.
Next paragraph mitigates this though:Thank you! This must have been what I heard the lady talking about - she said the building was swaying when the addition was made, jmo. I remember thinking at the time that maybe this was a factor.
—
From above:
“It isn’t clear if the addition of a penthouse put undue stress on the south tower, though any possible irregularity related to the building is receiving new attention from local authorities and engineers after its sudden collapse.”
I was in the facilities business for awhile. There isn't a building on the planet that does bot require periodic maintenance. Plenty of non-oceanfront high rises have expensive issues. Florida has high rises built on oceanfront property all up and down the Atlantic coast. This is an extremely rare issue.I think it is a combination of all of those things. The failures you mention, as well as environmental factors. Not one or the other.
The environmental risks would be minimised - and probably the expensive maintenance would be less costly and more financially easily achieved - if we didn't build highrises on the shoreline. If instead we built them on bedrock or areas that are not subject to porous limestone underneath, organic fill, tidal effects, erosion ....
What floor did the boy who survived live on? Tia.
The below was posted by someone earlier. He was in Apt 1002, which I assume is the 10th floor? Amazing he survived. I think all of these apartments were on the north side of the building.
Where in the collapsed part of the building did the people who were found so far (alive or deceased) live?
#1002: A mother and 15-year old son pulled out of the rubble alive on the first day; the mother, who had her leg amputated, later died in a hospital
#903: An older couple found deceased
#801: A 54-year old man found deceased
Source: Colin Scroggins CNAW (reporter)
Thank you. One reason I asked is because I was reminded of the person in the WTC on 9/11 who “surfed” down:
“Buzzelli, dubbed the "9/11 Surfer," had somehow landed safely on a pile of rubble that had been the World Trade Center after about a 15-story fall.”
'9/11 Surfer' tells survival tale 11 years later
MIRACLE MAN
I survived 9/11 by surfing 15 floors on slab of concrete
Miracle hidden for 11 years by myth, disbelief and survivor guilt is revealed for first time
—
eta/ BBM above
—
Eta2: In the video I posted above about the Australian building which has cracks in it and people had to evacuate, losing all their $ in the residence, iirc the crack was first detected on the 10th floor.
What floor was the penthouse addition?
This reminds me of an on-site first responder speaking the other night; I think it may have been a FD Chief who was also at Ground Zero. He said when they found a mattress, they knew they were looking in the right place, near bedroom(s), because people would have been sleeping at that hour.Wow, I've never heard that 9/11 story. The boy was found under his bed I believe, so somehow he and his bed ended up in the same place. His story will probably shed light, though I imagine he will have that same inability to talk about it.
The building was 12 floors, but I'm not sure if that included the penthouse.
Hmm. Idk, the impression I got was there was an addition, maybe I misinterpreted. I’ll have to look into this now. I deleted my post in case it is wrong, which it sounds like it may be. Thanks for pointing that out, @GatorFL.![]()
Hi @Bears. It could have been, thank you,this is prob what you’re thinking of
—
One last theory under consideration is the possibility that heavy construction next door in 2019 could have damaged the Champlain Towers building. An email released by the city on Sunday revealed that a member of the condo board had gone to the city for help at the time, expressing “concerns regarding the structure of our building.”
Town officials declined to intervene, suggesting that the residents hire someone to monitor any impacts.
Possible Failure Point Emerges in Miami-Area Building Collapse