kittythehare
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2016
- Messages
- 18,562
- Reaction score
- 109,263
Same as that!!!Wonderful, empathetic thoughts Kittythehare,
My hinky meter has been pinging all along when I 'sniff' comments from BOTH temporary homes he was in.
When the Snead's Atty. gave his first presser, he commented "There was no shortage of money with this boy".
He knew NC carried cash and had some income etc. So did the Sneads.
I'm suspect of the Deschamps home due to her past 'experience' w/ LE. And also the missing $2900.
There's no way I will believe NC was 'offered' a home in either place, IMO, unless these adults knew he could pay
his way, food, rent, clothes, etc. Neither home was rolling in money, quite the opposite. I'm convinced they thought
this vulnerable youth may be a cash cow for them. Sorry, for being a skeptic but people just don't take in young man
at a troublesome time in his life and not expect to have problems UNLESS he pays his way and you make something
off of him. Deschamps knew he was a problem child, she saw it as a former neighbor. Sneads claim they knew
nothing about NC. Bull hockey. Their son was a classmate, I''m sure he knew stuff. But Sneads told their atty.
'there was no shortage of money". I just don't buy their stories.
I wonder whether he knew and whether it contributed to his desperation, abandonment and decision to take the action he did?