This officer is an employee of a school district, he had a boss that determined his equipment, training, security measures, supportive personnel, and protocols.
The fact that a resource officer can be tried for negligence, and found guilty or even innocent for failure to act as an armed resource officer in protecting students means we have a problem.
Is it really the sole responsibility of a single resource officer?
Why was security in the golf cart with him not also armed?
How many armed officers were on the 45 acre campus with over 3000 students?
If guilty and he alone is believed responsible then the sentence may be great. What would you be thinking as a resource officer at any of the school districts in Florida?
If guilty and the sentence is light- then the district admin may also be held responsible.
If innocent- who is responsible beyond the shooter?
A resource officer is only as good as the support they receive from district admin, the security team. Resource officers do not act alone, but within a system set up by the district.
Did this officer complain about security on campus? Other armed officers? Gates, doors?
After this trial…
Do resource officers with this kind of experience at public schools feel prepared for an active shooter? How can they even know if they have not encountered a shooter?
If they do not feel prepared, they should say something until they do feel prepared or find employment at a district that supports their concerns.
Very curious on this trial as the fall out will be huge!
There are over 2200 high schools, just in Florida- 1400 of those are public.
Across the nation there are over 98,000 public schools, over 130,000 schools.
This is about 14,000 public school districts.
JMO