my bolding
No one, because the darker picture wasn't the original picture to begin with. That was disinformation.
How could the darker picture that ran on 3/22 be the original, when the lighter picture had already been run in several media outlets prior to that?
And how could a cropped picture be the original when the full picture was run in the media prior to that?
Answer, that darker picture was NOT the original. It was disinformation.
It had already been in the media, here are but a few links that show it had already been in the media.
3/20;
http://newsone.com/nation/tjstarr/million-hoody-march-trayvon-martin/
3/18;
http://carolynedgar.com/2012/03/18/the-tragic-case-of-trayvon-martin/
3/20
http://www.dominionofnewyork.com/20...rtment-launches-trayvon-martin-investigation/
Since the darker picture wasn't really the original, should we now wonder if the MH intentionally altered it to portray Trayvon as darker? Because apparently there are those who believed that making him look lighter would make him look less suspicious.