Yes, it does look bad...unless they found the shirt outside which would also mean she is not still wearing it. For them not to specify where they found it is wrong unless they are trying to make her look bad.Boy that really looks bad on Misty now.......really bad.
Why just Haleigh and not the little boy? Maybe because MC woke up and interrupted a custody kidnapping. Just a thought.
MC is just a child. I don't think she is cunning or deceitful. I think she is a victim of a horrible childhood and a bit slow mentally.
I am still sticking with the intruder theory and that RC and MC have no idea who or what happened. MC's "inconsistencies" are to me, poor communication skills and the fact that she has had to repeat things many times and gets things out of order. She just isnt' real smart, but I don't think she is lying - at all.
Do you mean to tell me that Misti could not tell them what the child was wearing? Is she changing this story too. I mean, you remember what you put on a child after a bath if indeed she did bath her and dress her that night. Maybe she just let the child sleep in what ever she had on........................come on, this is getting absolutely crazy with the wishy washy details!!
For the same reasons they won't discuss anything. Ongoing investigation yada yada yada.When asked at presser if Misti had a car, LE said they would not discuss it..(my words).
Why?
When asked at presser if Misti had a car, LE said they would not discuss it..(my words).
Why?
My girls have tons of pink shirts. How would they know that the pink shirt they found after Haleigh went missing was "the" pink shirt, unless Misty herself told them??
I wondered the same thing, the "pee" was inserted in there not as a response to any question, but like someting she had to make sure and let people know.
I brought it up back in thread 18. Seems weird, and sad that she would even have to bring this up. We (here) talked about it, and personally, it says alot. It is mentioned at the same time she feels compelled to say " I was cleaning"...
Because the guy is a fraud and yes it is a rule.
I agreeI doubt this "perplord" (as SS calls) told anybody anything. Long as that rent's coming in... and while dad might have figured this out, I doubt gf had a clue.
And had you a key to the front door, while you might enter the front door w/out looking suspicious or raising alarms, you certainly wouldn't want to exit the same way in plain sight of neighbors w/ an abducted child... you would choose, and prepare, the most discreet low visibility door and secluded path possible. This suggests to me someone on foot, not driving or w/ any car parked in front, ie neighbor (or local). This seems significant! Does anyone agree??! JMO
arrot:
Whats with this Misty? She doesn't even know what the kid was wearing to bed? ticks me off.
DNA testing and they had to wait on it to come back after they found it last week perhaps?It could be the teacher or someone else who saw Haleigh ID'd it.
thanks for your help, tehcloser - I need to go back and re-read them...
I think they found the shirt.
In the woods?
Why wouldn't they tell us exactly where it was found?
DNA testing and they had to wait on it to come back after they found it last week perhaps?
An arrest soon? Or am I just hoping to much?
I have not heard, but legally Rj was to be returned to his father on Sunday by 6:00pm. Rj had been staying with Ronnie's mother, TN, and not in the tent.Has there been any mention of JR being returned to his dad after his visit this weekend with his mother? Do we know who is caring for him since this last visit? Is he sleeping in the tent with the dad and gf? I am sure DFCS has been contacted since Haleigh has been missing and if they have an open case on them, we need to watch and keep up with who has Jr.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.